Get PJ Media on your Apple

Ed Driscoll

Krauthammer’s Law Defined

September 22nd, 2013 - 8:21 pm

“To understand the workings of American politics, you have to understand this fundamental law: Conservatives think liberals are stupid. Liberals think conservatives are evil,” Charles Krauthammer wrote in 2002. And viewing someone of a differing ideology as being evil is a very different stance than viewing him as simply uninformed or otherwise somehow misguided.

Or as Michael Walsh wrote this past July:

The key to understanding the Left is knowing that they inhabit a Manichean fantasy world in which history is controlled by roiling, magical forces, in which signs, symbols, and portents are more important than empirical reality and in which their opponents are not just wrong but evil. They see life as a zero-sum game of winners and losers, with themselves cast as the heroes of their own overarching ur-Narrative, from which all other their other dialectic narratives (rich vs. poor, black vs. white, “privileged” vs. the undeserving poor, the “war on women,” etc.) flow.



Click to enlarge.

As Jonathan Last writes, “‘Evil’? I’m sorry. Are you f***ing kidding?”

Let’s pretend we’re going to accept all of the substantive criticisms of Rumsfeld. He was wrong about Iraq. He dictatorially imposed his mistaken views on his subordinates and refused to listen to contrary opinions. At some point he became blinded to incoming evidence because of his own blinkered commitment to his course of action. Even if all of that is true, it doesn’t make him evil. Not even close.

You know who’s evil? Mohammad Atta was evil. And I wouldn’t make such a big deal over Geer not being able to make moral distinctions between Donald Rumsfeld and Mohammad Atta, except that he tweeted this on, you know, the f***ing anniversary of September 11.

Twelve years before Donald Rumseld had the pleasure of meeting Stephen Geer, he spent his morning helping to carry wounded colleagues out of the burning Pentagon.

“Stephen Geer was Director of Email and Online Fundraising for Barack Obama’s 2008 presidential campaign. He is now a partner at OMP in Washington, DC,” according to his Twitter profile.

It goes without saying that his former boss shares an exceedingly similar worldview.

Comments are closed.

All Comments   (3)
All Comments   (3)
Sort: Newest Oldest Top Rated
So, now I'm curious, how does the Samantha Power post of a few days ago jive with this Krauthammer's Law post? "The Faces of Meth" certainly does seem like something that liberals would find clever!
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
Reading the comments to Last's piece, Geer's one staunch defender actually justifies his comment vis-a-vis Mohammad Atta by saying this:

"...And it didn’t even matter, Saddam would be swept away by the Arab spring in 2011 like Mubarak and Assad, and we would help, and we would spent a trillion dollars less on that campaign, and Americans wouldn’t be so tired of this endless war. ..."

That's liberal reality. Never mind the idea that in the fall of 2013 you can still be thinking the Arab Spring was a great step forward for U.S. security in the global terrorism threat, but all you have to do to justify Rumsfeld being evil is simply assume that events would have unfolded that would have swept Saddam from power ... even though the far-less-secure Assad is still in power despite Obama threatening to huff and puff and blow his house down.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
Typical metrosexual pansy. I wish some genie could give Stevie the chance to hang with Rummy during F9F carrier landings in the 1950s.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
View All

One Trackback to “Krauthammer’s Law Defined”