By the Numbers

Why I like divided government:

* Overall spending: 2001 (President Clinton’s final budget year) $1.864 trillion; 2002 $2.011 trillion; 2003 $2.157 trillion; 2004 (estimate) $2.305 trillion.

* Overall Bush spending increase, 2002 through 2004: $441 billion, or 23.7 percent.

* Last three-year period when overall spending growth was that fast: 1989 through 1991, 24.3 percent.

* Overall Clinton spending increase, 1994 through 2001: $454 billion, or 32.2 percent.

Advertisement

Note that third item. What is it about administrations named Bush, and huge increases in discretionary spending? Bush 41, you could argue, had an excuse — the Democrats who controlled Congress had him over a barrel. Bush 43 has no excuse, since war and security spending account for less than half the increase.

There’s more:

* Overall discretionary spending: 2001 $664 billion; 2002 $735 billion; 2003 $846 billion; 2004 $873 billion.

* Overall discretionary spending increase under Bush, 2002 through 2004: $209 billion, or 10.5 percent annually.

* Overall discretionary spending increase under Clinton, 1994 through 2001: $141 billion, or 3.4 percent annually.

Now, defense spending (which is considered “discretionary,” for reasons stupid enough to require at least two double martinis) is up about a third — which, as I noted before, is less than half the total increase. And you can’t blame the so-so economy, either, since unemployment benefits don’t fall under the discretionary ledger.

Advertisement

Numbers don’t lie: The Republicans are trying to buy electoral dominance. I resent that, and you should, too.

Recommended

Trending on PJ Media Videos

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Advertisement
Advertisement