05-23-2018 10:30:41 AM -0700
05-18-2018 12:27:15 PM -0700
05-17-2018 08:38:50 AM -0700
05-11-2018 07:34:04 AM -0700
05-09-2018 10:17:16 AM -0700
It looks like you've previously blocked notifications. If you'd like to receive them, please update your browser permissions.
Desktop Notifications are  | 
Get instant alerts on your desktop.
Turn on desktop notifications?
Remind me later.

Stretch, grab a late afternoon cup of caffeine and get caught up on the most important news of the day with our Coffee Break newsletter. These are the stories that will fill you in on the world that's spinning outside of your office window - at the moment that you get a chance to take a breath.
Sign up now to save time and stay informed!

College Speech Codes Discriminate Against People With Asperger's, Prof. Argues

Campus speech codes, such as “hate speech policies,” discriminate against people with Asperger's and related conditions, argues one professor in a recent op-ed.

Geoffrey Miller, a professor at the University of New Mexico, advanced the claim in an essay for Quillette, arguing that campus speech codes impose unrealistic demands on students and professors with Asperger's, Tourette's, ADHD, and other conditions.

These conditions can cause people to say things impulsively (ADHD), blurt out offensive comments (Tourette's), and reduce one’s ability to understand social norms (Asperger's), yet campus speech codes make no concessions for these students, argues Miller.

According to the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE), almost 40% of colleges in the U.S. maintain “severely restrictive” speech rules that regulate constitutionally protected speech on campus, according to a report published in 2017.

Designed to prevent racist, sexist, classist, and heterosexist remarks, these speech codes threaten students and professors with sanctions if they dare joke about, say, a Pakistani call center or illegal immigration.

Those who fail to comply with college speech codes, such as by offending another student or by expressing Republican viewpoints, may be reported to an administrator or a “bias response team,” and could face numerous consequences, regardless of whether they intended to cause offense or not.

Therein lies the problem. Campus speech codes assume all students can anticipate whether or not their speech might hurt the feelings of another person, and adjust themselves accordingly (before they accidentally offend someone). But students who are non-neurotypical, Miller argues, have an especially difficult time doing this.

The result? Students and professors with Asperger's and related conditions are held to rules that are “literally incomprehensible” to them, according to Miller. “It’s impossible to follow a rule that doesn’t make sense,” he notes.

Miller, the first academic to raise this concern, told PJ Media he was motivated to write about this issue after he noticed a pattern among the types of people who were falling prey to disciplinary action from their colleges.

“Professors who got in the most trouble for violated speech codes often seemed to be on the autism/Asperger's spectrum,” says Miller, who has spent almost 30 years in academia. “They didn't mean to upset people; they just didn't anticipate other people's reactions very accurately.”

Treating these people like thought-criminals is problematic, Miller notes, because “if we stigmatize everybody who's neurodiverse and drive them out of academia in the name of political correctness, we'll lose a huge proportion of our most creative minds.”

Case in point: Tim Hunt, a nerdy male scientist who won the Nobel Prize in 2001 for his work on cell biology, is one of most high-profile researchers who’ve been driven out of academia for causing offense.