“Climate change” is a controversial subject. Some people believe that humans have been doing just about everything wrong and are causing the Earth to heat up to such a degree that we will wipe out civilization. Other people actually examine the evidence and think for themselves.
But the first group includes three professors from the University of Colorado, who have declared that on the subject of climate change, their students aren’t allowed to dissent with their views:
Three professors co-teaching an online course called “Medical Humanities in the Digital Age” at the University of Colorado-Colorado Springs recently told their students via email that man-made climate change is not open for debate, and those who think otherwise have no place in their course.
“The point of departure for this course is based on the scientific premise that human induced climate change is valid and occurring. We will not, at any time, debate the science of climate change, nor will the ‘other side’ of the climate change debate be taught or discussed in this course,” states the email, a copy of which was provided to The College Fix by a student in the course.
Signed by the course’s professors Rebecca Laroche, Wendy Haggren and Eileen Skahill, it was sent after several students expressed concern for their success in the course after watching the first online lecture about the impacts of climate change.
“Opening up a debate that 98% of climate scientists unequivocally agree to be a non-debate would detract from the central concerns of environment and health addressed in this course,” the professors’ email continued.
The email also banned discussion on class message boards, and told students who have a problem with that to drop the class.
First, why is a Humanities course talking about climate change?
Oh, right: Everything must be used to advance the narrative, even if it has no place in the discussion.
While you might expect better from college professors, they either don’t know or don’t care that their “98 percent of climate scientists” argument has been debunked, junked, and ridiculed for a long time now, and not just by fly-by-night blogs no one has heard of, either.
This is nothing more than yet another attempt by liberal academia to influence public debate outside of schools by stifling the debate inside of schools. After all, few people really bother getting up to speed on such issues outside of a school environment, so students will be guided by what is crammed down their throats in school — generally at the taxpayer’s expense.
Frankly, I think this class should be dropped. By the college.
Additionally, the alumni need to stop supporting the school until such time as this class is gone, these professors are rebuked, and the school promotes and permits open debate.
Join the conversation as a VIP Member