This is mostly full of what you would expect from cheerleaders in the MSM but there are a couple of notable nuggets here, the first of which is an implication that Kerry has grown weary of the boss’s thumb-twiddling:
Kerry is an activist and simply couldn’t abide the fact that people were dying and the United States wasn’t at least trying to stop it.
The comments on Kerry are generally full of praise for a Secretary of State who talks about climate change as a threat more than he does terrorism.
Amid the repeated reminders in the op-ed that Palestinians are dying, the author tosses out this gem:
As for Hamas, it’s not easy to read its calculations, in part because it’s not clear whether the military or political wing is in charge.
Really? Are we still pretending there is a lot of nuance there?
Let me offer some armchair (ok, desk chair) analysis: Hamas attacks Israel until it runs out of things with which to attack. As a distraction while re-arming, Hamas then whines about retaliation and is supported by useful idiots in various media around the world. Then it attacks again.
It is rather difficult to deal with the various evils in the world when so many keep playing dangerous games of moral equivalence.