New information on Jihad al-Shamie, who murdered two people and injured four others in a jihad attack at Heaton Park synagogue in north Manchester, England on Yom Kippur, is coming out in dribs and drabs. Each new revelation reinforces the impression that this man should have been caught and deported long before he was ever in a position to murder anyone. Or alternatively, he never should have been in Britain in the first place.
Either one of those alternatives, however, would have required British authorities to have far more knowledge of the nature and magnitude of the jihad threat than they have ever displayed or showed any interest in gaining. Both would also require a good deal more courage than has been seen in Britain outside of Tommy Robinson for quite some time.
The UK’s i Paper reported Tuesday that al-Shamie “had been living a double life with up to three wives in separate towns before he carried out the attack.” His first wife and their child lived with him in Prestwich, a town north of Manchester. In two separate Islamic ceremonies, however, he had also married a second and a third wife. “Islamic marriages that take place in the UK,” says the I Paper laconically, “are not legally binding under UK law.”
And there’s the rub. Polygamy is illegal in the UK, but British authorities are desperate not to offend their growing and restive Muslim communities, and so they generally turn a blind eye to situations such as al-Shamie’s marital arrangements. Yet Muslims who are devout enough to put into practice the Qur’an’s call to “marry the women who seem good to you, two or three or four” (4:3) are also likely to take the whole book seriously, including its calls to wage jihad against non-Muslims, and “kill them wherever you find them” (2:191, 4:89, 4:91, cf. 9:5). If British (and American) authorities kept track of Muslim polygamists, they would find more than once or twice that they had some jihadis in their sights.
They will not do that, however, because doing so would be tantamount to admitting that Islam had something to do with terrorism, which authorities on both sides of the Atlantic remain determined to ignore. That willful ignorance is also why Jihad al-Shamie was in Britain in the first place.
Back in 2006, when he was 16, Jihad al-Shamie was granted British citizenship. There is no doubt whatsoever that no one ever stopped to wonder whether a fellow named “Jihad” might someday… wage jihad. By that time, five years after 9/11 and one year after the July 7 jihad attacks in London, British officials already knew better than to raise concerns about jihad, either as a concept or as a name. We were all being regularly assured that jihad meant “struggle,” and mainly referred to the struggle in the soul against sin, and that only racists and “Islamophobes” thought it carried any more ominous meaning.
In reality, however, the primary jihad in Islamic theology is the struggle against unbelievers with the goal of imposing Sharia upon them. The propaganda, however, was so pervasive that if anyone had actually raised concerns about Jihad al-Shamie’s name, he would have faced the very real prospect of both personal and professional ruin.
And so when it comes to Jihad al-Shamie, what’s in a name? Nothing. Nothing whatsoever. And so he was granted British citizenship with no one dreaming of questioning if maybe his name was or could be some kind of signifier.
Related: Whatever Happens in Gaza Now, One Outcome Is Certain Beyond Any Doubt
All this willful ignorance regarding the jihad threat, and there is a great deal more, tends to make jihadis think, with abundant justification, that they have the upper hand. That is a dangerous impression to give a jihadi, for the Qur’an says: “So do not falter and cry out for peace when you have the upper hand, and Allah is with you, and he will not deprive you of your actions.” (47:35). And so one should not meet gestures of good will with reciprocal good will, but should press on to total victory. And that’s what we’re seeing now, not just in Manchester on Yom Kippur, but all over the West.
No one ever suspected that it would, Jihad al-Shamie’s name did indeed turn out to be an omen. But it was an omen that the entire Western world has been trained to disregard and ignore. And so there will be many more lessons and omens and signs ignored, and jihads committed as a result. The watchmen at the gates know that it would be “Islamophobic” to watch all that closely.
Read the New York Times, the Washington Post, any one of them, or watch CNN or MSNBC, and you'll never get the truth about the Yom Kippur synagogue attack. For that, come to us. Get the real story—sign up with promo code POTUS47 for 74% off VIP membership.
Join the conversation as a VIP Member