No, Trump Won't Be on a $250 Bill

There’s just a big problem with the whole narrative. There's a small detail buried in the reporting that the hyperventilating coverage seems determined to gloss over: none of it can actually happen without an act of Congress. And the last time anyone checked, that legislation has been going nowhere fast. So what exactly is the story here?

Breaking news: Trump administration officials have pressed the Bureau of Engraving and Printing to design a $250 bill featuring the president’s portrait, in what would be the first appearance of a living person on U.S. currency in more than 150 years. https://t.co/S8sqdKSB7i

— The Washington Post (@washingtonpost) May 28, 2026

Let's walk through what the Post actually reported, because it's worth appreciating the gap between the framing and the facts.

So, two Trump appointees at the Treasury Department, U.S. Treasurer Brandon Beach and his senior adviser Mike Brown, pushed the Bureau of Engraving and Printing to design a $250 note with Trump's portrait, timed to coincide with America's 250th birthday, and mockups were prepared. That’s it.

The distinction that the liberal media hopes you don’t make is that designing something and printing it are two entirely different things, and that a federal law currently prohibits placing a living person on U.S. currency.

Patricia Solimene, then-director of the Bureau of Engraving and Printing, immediately flagged the legal and procedural obstacles. She made sure Beach and Brown understood the law before she was reassigned from her post in April. Mike Brown has since taken over as bureau director. And by the Washington Post’s own account, Brown is prepared to wait until Congress actually passes authorizing legislation before moving forward with it. That is how the law works.

That is the administration following the law.

And, legislation to authorize Trump's image on the $250 bill was introduced in Congress last year, surprising no one, it has gone nowhere. There is no reason to believe this Congress will push it across the finish line.

ICYMI: Now We Know Who Was Really Behind E. Jean Carroll’s Bogus Allegations Against Trump

Treasury Secretary Bessent addressed the whole thing at a White House press briefing, and his response was more clarifying than any six paragraphs the Post managed to produce. CNN's Kaitlan Collins pressed him on whether it was even a good political idea to put Trump's face on currency while Americans are struggling at the gas pump.

"Again, I don't really understand this Washington Post article," Bessent said. "Terribly written, terribly edited, because basically what it says is that Treasury is following the law and that we've created the bill and that it's up to Congress. I didn't really understand what the story was."

Collins followed up by asking why Treasury was even preparing for the possibility. Bessent's answer was entirely reasonable: "We prepare for everything if it gets passed, just like we were ready six months in advance for the one big beautiful bill for tax guidance. So we have to prepare in advance. You can't draw something up the day before."

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent on the prospect of a $250 bill with President Trump's portrait on it:

"I think that it's bifurcated. Do you think we should have a 250th anniversary celebration?...

"I don't think that there's anything untoward about having the president of the… pic.twitter.com/Xv9yarsqSq

— Kaitlan Collins (@kaitlancollins) May 28, 2026

I guess we’re supposed to believe that a government agency doing advance planning in case Congress passes a law is now a scandal? Nice try.

I’m sure you’re all thinking what I’m thinking: it would be cool to see Trump on a $250 bill. But, it’s not going to happen, nor frankly, should it. I don’t even want an exception made because when that happens, it opens up the floodgates. The last thing I’d want is for Democrats to put Barack Obama’s face on our money.

And you know they probably would, too.