After four years of Joe Biden in the White House, it’s hard to shake the sense that America has a two-tiered justice system. For years, we watched as Democrats contorted the law in a relentless effort to put Donald Trump behind bars and block his return to the Oval Office. And just because Trump beat the politically motivated legal attacks and reclaimed the presidency doesn’t mean the system has suddenly become fair — or that the double standards have disappeared.
An Obama-nominated federal judge has issued an order that perfectly exposes the absurd double standard in our justice system today. The judge ruled that the Trump administration must stop referring to Kilmar Abrego Garcia as a “wife-beating gangbanger” amid ongoing legal proceedings.
“Government employees have made extrajudicial statements that are troubling, especially where many of them are exaggerated if not simply inaccurate,” U.S. District Judge Waverly Crenshaw claimed in court documents. “These statements made allegations regarding Abrego’s ‘character or reputation’ and expressed government officials’ views on Abrego’s ‘guilt or innocence.'”
The judge has a partially valid point — there’s an argument for upholding legal standards and for federal officials to avoid prejudicial language. But let’s be real about what we actually know about Abrego Garcia. The Department of Justice has documented domestic violence allegations from his wife, Jennifer Vasquez. These aren’t vague rumors on social media; we’re talking a 2021 restraining order petition detailing physical assault. Then there are the human trafficking suspicions from a 2022 Tennessee traffic stop, where police found him driving eight people crammed into a vehicle with no luggage. And don’t overlook the tattoos that clearly mark him as an MS-13 gang member.
Every single claim checks out. Prejudicial? Maybe. Accurate? Absolutely.
But here’s where I have a real problem. No one can pretend that avoiding prejudicial language was ever a priority when Donald Trump was under legal assault. For years, Democrats in Congress — federal officials — treated every indictment like a smoking-gun confession, parading the former president through one bogus case after another. The very presumption of innocence and the safeguards of a fair trial that the left demands for Abrego Garcia today didn’t apply to Trump. In his case, they trampled both without a second thought whenever it didn’t suit their narrative.
In fact, Trump was explicitly denied the presumption of innocence. Remember when Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg secured that grand jury indictment against Trump on March 30, 2023, over a $130,000 "hush money" payment to porn actress Stormy Daniels? Nancy Pelosi stepped right up and argued that Trump would have to prove his innocence at trial. Suddenly, “innocent until proven guilty” didn’t apply. Democrats didn't hesitate to declare Trump guilty of inciting an insurrection or stealing classified documents the moment indictments dropped. They didn't wait for trials or verdicts. They certainly didn't worry about protecting the defendant's reputation or ensuring a fair process.
ICYMI: We Got Juicy Details on Obama’s Furious Call to Pelosi After Kamala Endorsement
So why does Kilmar Abrego Garcia, an illegal immigrant and alleged wife-beater with suspected gang connections and human trafficking concerns, get the full protection of legal niceties while Trump was afforded no such luxury? When Democrats wanted Trump's head, they weaponized every legal tool at their disposal and threw the presumption of innocence out the window. They smeared him relentlessly before any jury heard a single piece of evidence. Yet here we are, with a judge lecturing the Trump administration about proper legal decorum for a man facing serious allegations.
This isn't about whether Abrego Garcia deserves due process; this is about the glaring hypocrisy of a system that bends over backward to protect an illegal immigrant while Democrats trampled all over the rights of an American citizen, then a former and now the current president. If our justice system is going to preach about fairness and the presumption of innocence, maybe it should apply those standards equally instead of reserving them for people who fit the right political narrative.
