I’m sure you’ve heard Frank Sinatra’s version of “New York, New York,” which captured a time when the city symbolized boundless opportunity and the promise of the American Dream. Sadly, that vision feels like a cruel joke today. Decades of Democrat mismanagement, rampant crime, and crushing taxes have hollowed out the New York that once inspired the song, driving families and businesses to flee to freer, safer states. Once a beacon of hope and freedom, New York City now serves as a cautionary tale—a monument to left-wing policies that have turned the city of dreams into a city of decline.
Mayor Eric Adams suspended his reelection campaign Sunday—a major development, but one that doesn’t fundamentally alter the race. Voters are still left with a miserable choice between two deeply flawed candidates: Zohran Mamdani, a far-left radical, and Chris Cuomo, who is only marginally less awful. Curtis Sliwa, despite heavy pressure, refuses to exit the race—and even if he did, it wouldn’t make much difference. His name will remain on the ballot, and polls show Mamdani still holding a decisive edge in a head-to-head matchup with Cuomo. So while some might cling to the idea that a Cuomo win would be the lesser evil, the odds of that happening look slim at best. A recent Marist poll shows socialist Mamdani commanding a 21-point lead over Cuomo among likely voters. This isn't just a political horse race; it's a referendum on whether New York wants to accelerate its descent into socialist chaos or merely continue its slow-motion collapse under establishment leftism.
New York City looks increasingly set to elect a candidate pushing a socialist agenda—policies that have already fueled crises in places like Seattle, Portland, and San Francisco, where crime has surged, homelessness has spread, and businesses have fled in droves. The city’s political outlook is bleak, and the warning signs have been obvious for years. New York’s decline didn’t happen overnight. The rot set in after Rudy Giuliani left office, when Michael Bloomberg imposed his nanny-state mentality, micromanaging soda sizes and smoking bans while ignoring deeper problems. Bill de Blasio went further, dismantling effective policing and empowering criminals. Eric Adams promised a course correction but delivered more of the same.
ICYMI: Scott Jennings Drops a Truth Bomb on CNN Panel About Comey Indictment
Which brings us to today, where voters are left with Mamdani or Cuomo—Sliwa, let’s be honest won’t win. It’s a losing proposition for a once-great city. And that’s how we got to today’s New York: a perfect storm of self-inflicted wounds, from soaring crime and a migrant crisis straining city resources to crushing taxes driving residents and businesses away, all under leadership that treats symptoms while ignoring root causes. The exodus of productive citizens and job creators isn’t coincidence—it’s consequence.
The fundamental problem isn't any single candidate or election cycle. It's a voting base that consistently enables decline by supporting leaders who prioritize ideology over results. Until New Yorkers acknowledge the direct connection between their electoral choices and the city's deteriorating conditions, no amount of political maneuvering will change the trajectory.
At this point, the best we can hope for is that a Mamdani administration finally forces New Yorkers to confront the consequences of their choices. But let’s be honest—if decades of Democrat misrule haven’t driven the point home, it’s hard to believe four years of Mamdani will suddenly wake people up. The grim reality is that New Yorkers long ago became accessories to the city’s decline, voting time and again for the very policies that continue to tear it apart.
