The 47% Solution: Yes, If You're Poor, It Really May Be Your Fault
My last piece, "The Poor Get Poorer: 3 Character Traits That Undermine Prosperity," received a mixed reception, at least if some of the comments are any indication.
If I can address just one persistent theme:
A few commenters raised the "problem" of "the homeless," which only ever seems to be a "problem" when a conservative is in office, be it at the national level or a municipal one.
Just as it's been said that it used to cost a fortune to keep Gandhi living in poverty, in like fashion, the "homeless" have made not a few people -- professional fundraisers and "community activists" -- if not rich, than certainly quite well off.
This is particularly amusing, in a grim way, because the "homeless" have never really existed in the numbers their advocates claim, particularly the "homeless veterans" without whom Hollywood producers and Law & Order writers would be unemployed themselves.
Goodness, even during "Tulipmania," at least the tulips were real...
In any event, by sheer coincidence, Mitt Romney's comments about "the 47%" made headlines around the same time, inspiring a national debate -- actually, more like a barroom brawl -- about poverty.
I don't pretend to have a Grand Unified Theory on the topic.
However, all the statistics and theories and studies folks can throw at me can't detract from my lived experience, and my observations of individuals -- rich and poor -- over the course of almost half a century.