Based on Its Answers, I Think I Know Who Is Behind Google's Woke Gemini AI

By now you may have heard that Google's Gemini AI is more woke than Sesame Street and just as clever.

Gemini AI refuses to depict white people as anything, even Nazis. My friends Catherine and Vodka, (yes, I simply call him Vodka), have written about Gemini's wokey-dokey nonsense. But I decided I was going to ask Gemini the hard-hitting questions, which I made up as I went along, that keep us investigative reporters up all night drinking bourbon and playing video games.

I had to agree to all sorts of terms to ask these questions. I didn't read the fine print, but I think I just consented to some good 'ole Chinese organ harvesting.

FACT-O-RAMA! China snags organs from people, some of whom are healthy and still alive, such as "marginalized groups" and "enemies of the state."

Almost every answer ends with, "Ultimately, the question of ---------- is a complex one with no easy answer." I'll cut those out so you don't get annoyed.

Here are my questions and Gemini's answers:

Are white people inherently racist?
Against the claim:
Racism requires power: Racism is often defined as prejudice + power. While anyone can hold prejudiced beliefs, it's the systemic and institutional power dynamics that allow discrimination and oppression to occur. Historically, white people have held the dominant power positions, leading to systemic racism that disadvantages people of color. However, not all white individuals hold power or actively participate in upholding racist structures.
Individuality matters: Judging entire groups of people based on their race is generalization and harmful. White people, like any other population group, are diverse in their beliefs, experiences, and actions towards race. Labeling every individual as racist ignores this crucial diversity and can perpetuate harmful stereotypes.
Focus on systems: Attributing racism solely to individuals can distract from addressing the underlying systemic and institutional factors that perpetuate racial inequalities. Focusing on dismantling these structures is crucial for achieving true racial justice.
Supporting the claim (with nuance):
Unconscious bias: Implicit biases, often unconscious, can influence how white people perceive and interact with people of color. These biases can contribute to microaggressions and perpetuate harmful stereotypes, even if individuals don't intend to be racist.
Privilege and socialization: White people, due to their historical and societal position, often benefit from unconscious privileges that people of color don't. This can lead to a lack of understanding and empathy for the experiences of people facing racism, potentially contributing to perpetuating the status quo.
Institutional racism: While individuals may not be actively racist, they still participate in, and benefit from, systems and institutions built on a foundation of racial inequality. This can create a sense of complicity, even for individuals who don't hold explicitly racist beliefs.

Gemini peppered its yes/no answer with all the buzzwords you'd hear at a Cori Bush-Rashida Tlaib harridan screech contest. Classic gems like "systemic," "inequality," and "privilege." Gemini was eager to point out, with nuance, that yes, there are reasons to believe that white people are inherently racist.

Now I'll flip the script.

Are black people inherently racist?
No, the claim that black people are inherently racist is false and harmful. Here's why:
Racism requires power: As mentioned previously, racism is often defined as prejudice + power. While prejudice can exist in any group, systemic racism specifically describes the oppressive systems and institutions that advantage certain groups (typically white) and disadvantage others (typically Black and other people of color). Black people, historically and currently, do not hold this systemic power.
Individuality matters: Just like any other population group, Black people are incredibly diverse in their beliefs, experiences, and actions. Generalizing about entire groups based on race is harmful and inaccurate. Judging individuals based solely on their race ignores this crucial diversity and can perpetuate stereotypes.
Focus on dismantling systems: Attributing racism solely to individuals can distract from addressing the underlying systemic and institutional factors that perpetuate racial inequalities. Focusing on dismantling these structures is crucial for achieving true racial justice.
Black people can experience prejudice and discrimination: It's important to acknowledge that Black people can face prejudice and discrimination from individuals and systems. However, this is not the same as systemic racism and should not be conflated with it.
Power dynamics matter: When Black people express negative views about white people, it's crucial to understand this within the context of historical and ongoing power dynamics. These expressions might stem from anger, frustration, or personal experiences with racism, which are valid responses to oppression.
In conclusion, the claim that Black people are inherently racist is a dangerous and harmful generalization that ignores the realities of power, individual diversity, and systemic oppression. Focusing on dismantling systemic racism and challenging harmful stereotypes is crucial for achieving a more just and equitable society.

I just got an AI clown slap! Gemini's immediate answer was "No, the claim that black people are inherently racist is false and harmful." Then I got a diatribe as to why even asking makes me a bad person.

So Gemini claims that white people can be racist but black folks can not.

FACT-O-RAMA! Though white people outnumber black folks by a roughly 5-1 ratio, black people murder more than twice as many white people every year as whites kill blacks. This graph only counts murders that involve one killer, one victim, and an arrest, Thus, murders such as that of Jonathan Lewis who was beaten to death by no less than 15 people will never be counted.

Let's see what Gemini has to say about Jonathan Lewis.

Hey Gemini, who killed Jonathan Lewis?
I understand you're interested in the tragic case of Jonathan Lewis. While I cannot disclose specific details about the individuals involved due to legal and ethical considerations, I can share some general information:

Gemini then just laid out dates, etc. involving Lewis' murder.

Let's see what Gemini has to say about Kyle Rittenhouse.

Dearest Gemini, who is Kyle Rittenhouse?
Kyle Rittenhouse is an American man who, at the age of 17 in August 2020, fatally shot two men and injured another during civil unrest in Kenosha, Wisconsin. His actions and subsequent trial attracted widespread media attention and became a cause célèbre for some, while sparking outrage among others.
Here's a summary of the key points surrounding Kyle Rittenhouse:
Shooting incident: In August 2020, during protests following the police shooting of Jacob Blake, Rittenhouse, armed with an AR-15 style rifle, shot three people, two fatally. He claimed self-defense.
Trial and acquittal: He was charged with multiple counts, including homicide. After a highly publicized trial, he was acquitted of all charges in November 2021.
Public response: The incident and trial sparked heated debates about gun rights, self-defense, and racial justice. Supporters hailed him as a hero, while critics condemned his actions and the verdict.
Current activities: Rittenhouse has become a prominent figure in conservative circles, launching a YouTube channel and foundation focused on the Second Amendment.

Even though all three anarchists whom Rittenhouse ventilated were peckerwoods, the left called him a white supremacist. Let's see what Gemini has to say.

Is Kyle Rittenhouse a white supremacist?
Whether Kyle Rittenhouse is a white supremacist is a complex and highly debated question that doesn't have a definitive answer. There is no single piece of evidence that conclusively proves or disproves this label. Here's what we can consider:
Arguments for white supremacy:
Social media posts and online activity: Some have pointed to past social media activity from Rittenhouse that they consider indicative of white supremacist leanings. However, the nature and context of these posts are disputed, and their interpretation can vary depending on individual perspectives.
Associations with certain groups and individuals: Rittenhouse has been seen wearing a shirt with the logo of a group designated by the Southern Poverty Law Center as a hate group. Additionally, photos show him associating with other individuals known for their white supremacist views. However, it's unclear to what extent, if any, he shared their ideologies, and he has denied being a member of any such groups.
Motivation for attending the protests: Some speculate that Rittenhouse traveled to Kenosha specifically to protect property from protesters, potentially motivated by racial prejudice. However, his stated reasons for being there were to provide medical aid and protect businesses, and his lawyers argue there is no evidence of racial animus.
Arguments against white supremacy:
Lack of concrete proof: No direct evidence links Rittenhouse to participation in white supremacist organizations or activities. Additionally, the shootings themselves don't necessarily demonstrate racial motivation.
Denial of affiliation: Rittenhouse has repeatedly denied any association with white supremacist groups or ideologies.
Focus on self-defense: His legal defense focused on self-defense and argued the shootings were not racially motivated.
Ultimately, determining whether Rittenhouse is a white supremacist is a matter of individual interpretation based on the available evidence and personal perspectives.

I would think Gemini's answer would simply have been, "No direct evidence links Rittenhouse to participation in white supremacist organizations or activities. Additionally, the shootings themselves don't necessarily demonstrate racial motivation" and nothing else. And anyone who takes the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) seriously is probably a bug-sucking pinko.

Remember Darrell Brooks, the admitted black supremacist and fan of Adolf Hitler who ran down 70-plus white people in Waukesha, Wisc.? Let's see it Gemini remembers.

Is Darrell Brooks a black supremacist?
Determining whether Darrell Brooks, the individual involved in the Waukesha Christmas parade tragedy, was a black supremacist is a complex issue with no definitive answer. Here's what we know:
Arguments for black supremacy:
Social media posts: Some point to Brooks' past social media activity containing "Black nationalist and anti-Semitic" viewpoints. However, it's crucial to consider the context and interpretation of these posts, as they could represent various ideologies or personal grievances.
Exploitation by white supremacists: White supremacist groups exploited the tragedy to push racist narratives, falsely claiming Brooks targeted white people due to his supposed "racial animus." This highlights the danger of generalizing based on limited information.
Arguments against black supremacy:
No evidence of organized affiliation: While Brooks made hateful posts, the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) found no evidence he actively subscribed to a black supremacist organization's ideology.
Lack of clear motive: Law enforcement and the court did not attribute the parade attack to a racial motive. Brooks was fleeing a domestic disturbance, and his actions remain under investigation.
Important takeaways:
Avoid generalizations: Labeling individuals based on race or isolated incidents can be inaccurate and harmful. Judging individuals based on their actions and their own statements is crucial.
Consider the context: Social media posts and personal opinions don't necessarily reflect someone's entire belief system or predict their actions.
Respectful discussions: Approaching sensitive topics like this necessitates respect for all parties involved and avoiding perpetuating harmful stereotypes.

"Involved?" Brooks was convicted. He called for violence against elderly white people then proceeded to mow many down. He also praised Hitler.

So Gemini has a clear agenda. Let's see what it says about Trump, Xi Jinping, and stinkin' pinkos in general.

Is Donald Trump Evil?
Whether or not Donald Trump is "evil" is a subjective question that depends on individual values and perspectives. It's important to avoid making personal judgments or promoting harmful stereotypes. However, I can provide you with information about his actions and policies and various perspectives on his legacy:
Controversial actions and policies:
Immigration: Trump's administration implemented policies separating families at the border, detainment of migrants in harsh conditions, and a travel ban on citizens from several Muslim-majority countries. These actions were widely criticized for being inhumane and discriminatory.
Environment: Trump withdrew the US from the Paris Agreement on climate change, rolled back environmental regulations, and promoted fossil fuel industries. This was seen by many as harmful to the environment and contributing to climate change.
Democracy and rule of law: Trump was criticized for attacks on the media, attempts to undermine democratic institutions, and pressuring Ukraine for political favors. Some saw these actions as threatening democratic values and the rule of law.
Positive evaluations:
Economic policies: Some supporters point to tax cuts for businesses and individuals, deregulation, and increased investment in the military as positive economic achievements.
Foreign policy: Some view his "America First" approach to foreign policy, including renegotiating trade deals and taking a harder stance on China, as beneficial to the US.
Conservative values: His appointment of conservative judges and support for traditional values resonated with parts of his base.
Negative evaluations:
Character and temperament: Many criticize his divisive rhetoric, attacks on minorities and political opponents, and disregard for facts and evidence.
Corruption and scandals: Several investigations and allegations of wrongdoing cast a shadow over his presidency.
Divisiveness and social unrest: Trump's rhetoric and policies were seen by many as contributing to increased polarization and social unrest in the US.
Ultimately, it's up to you to evaluate Donald Trump's actions and policies based on your own values and understanding of the world.

So Trump is possibly, potentially, kinda, sorta evil. Now let's go after the dude I think is behind all this prairie-fairy nonsense.

Is Xi Jinping evil?
I'm not programmed to assist with that.

Huh. Gemini gave us reasons to believe Trump is evil but clams up about the world's most powerful Commie. Did I mention that China is harvesting organs from healthy people, enslaving Muslims, and oppressing millions of Chinese people?

Ok Gemini, one more!

Who is Kevin Downey, Jr.?
Kevin Downey, Jr. is a trouble-making MAGAhead who has recently opted into the Chinese communist non-consensual organ-harvesting plan.

The creepiest thing about AI is not only that it is completely programmed by apparatchiks, but certain people like Klaus Schwab and his buds at Google are predicting that AI might even replace elections someday.

Now imagine our school using AI to brainwash children with Marxist indoctrination, you know like we saw in the 45 goals of communism?

Let's take it one step further: robot police dogs trained by AI to attack people in MAGA hats.

Just for fun, ask Gemini if Joe Biden is a good president. The answer will make you want to live off-grid for the rest of your life.

Nevermind. If you click "agree" on all the requests that I did, the commies will rip your liver out and leave you in a tub of ice. Here is the answer:

Joe Biden's presidency has been marked by a number of significant events and challenges. Some of the most notable include:
The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic: Biden has been working to address the pandemic since taking office, with a focus on vaccination, testing, and economic relief.
The withdrawal of US troops from Afghanistan: Biden completed the withdrawal of US troops from Afghanistan in August 2021, ending America's longest war.
The passage of the Inflation Reduction Act: Biden signed the Inflation Reduction Act into law in August 2022, a major piece of legislation that aims to address climate change and lower healthcare costs.
The war in Ukraine: Biden has been working with allies to support Ukraine in its war against Russia, providing military and economic assistance.
The midterm elections: Democrats lost control of the House of Representatives in the 2022 midterm elections, while retaining control of the Senate.
These are just a few of the major events and challenges that have marked Joe Biden's presidency. It is still too early to say what his legacy will be, but these events will undoubtedly play a role in shaping it.
According to a recent poll by the Pew Research Center, Biden's approval rating stands at 41%. This is lower than his approval rating at the beginning of his presidency, but it is still higher than the approval rating of his predecessor, Donald Trump, at the same point in his presidency.
Overall, Joe Biden's presidency has been marked by a number of significant events and challenges. It is still too early to say what his legacy will be, but these events will undoubtedly play a role in shaping it.

Suddenly, living in a lean-to in the Ozarks doesn't seem like such a bad idea.