10-15-2018 04:29:07 PM -0700
10-15-2018 02:28:20 PM -0600
10-15-2018 07:53:40 AM -0700
10-15-2018 07:06:07 AM -0700
10-14-2018 08:38:31 PM -0700
It looks like you've previously blocked notifications. If you'd like to receive them, please update your browser permissions.
Desktop Notifications are  | 
Get instant alerts on your desktop.
Turn on desktop notifications?
Remind me later.
PJ Media encourages you to read our updated PRIVACY POLICY and COOKIE POLICY.

Winston Churchill and the NFL Anthem Protests

We learned a great deal about the NFL on Sunday. Pittsburgh Steelers coach Mike Tomlin should spend more time preparing his team to play than cooking up plans to participate in anthem protests.  Army Ranger and Steelers tackle Alejandro Villanueva came out and saluted the flag while his team hid in the locker room before another embarrassing loss to a woeful underdog on the road in Chicago.

We learned that the NFL is doubling and tripling down on the anthem protests started by the still-unemployed Colin Kaepernick.  That’s bad business for the NFL and a mess that could have been avoided.

Images of NFL players protesting something as unifying and treasured as the flag and national anthem reminds me of something that happened in England that caught the attention of Winston Churchill, and others.   I’ll get to that in a moment.

The inescapable gravitational force of the anthem dispute is that mainstream Americans find it reprehensible to protest our nation’s flag and anthem.  They respect the right to protest, but don’t care to spend their money or time with the people who do.  They stand for the anthem at swim meets, baseball games and Independence Day picnics.  That’s bad news for the NFL.

Every year I host a Super Bowl party and invite some very casual football fans.  One of them emailed me last night:

On the chance that you kindly invite us over to watch the Super Bowl, I don’t think we are going to watch these idiots this time around.  I don’t care who is playing.  Whole teams sitting out the anthem?

Self selected audience of mine? Sure. But two fewer sets of eyeballs regardless for the NFL.  Don’t think that isn’t happening around the nation. Eyeballs are turning away from the NFL.

The Washington Post also continues to stick to it’s core business model of politicizing everything.  For the last few years, the Washington Post Sports page has become the Sports/Politics page.  Instead of scores and team news, the Post Sports/Politics page has served up headlines about race, Trump, Curt Schilling, race and more on Trump.

Yet on Saturday, Adam Kilgore and Abby Phillip wrote a story with the comically ironic headline “Trump turns sports into a political battleground with comments on NFL.”

“Hey that’s our job!,” the Post virtually shouted. “You aren’t allowed to turn sports into politics. We don’t want the competition!”  The Post has become the Daily Missal for those for whom politics is their religion.  No field of human experience is free from politicization.

Washington Post Sports page September 25, 2017.

But does any of this really matter?

This whole avoidable mess reminds me of an event Winston Churchill wrote about in The Gathering Storm, the first part of his masterpiece history of the Second World War.