A Nation of Saints
It was January, freezing cold, wet, and gray. Inside the meetinghouse, the whole village gathered for Rev. Samuel Parris’s sermon. In the front row sat his daughter, Betty, eight, and his twelve-year-old niece, Abigail Williams. Both were pale and sleepless, dark circles under their eyes. Their dresses were neat, their posture stiff, but a nervous energy clung to them, as though at any moment they might collapse into one of the fits that had lately begun to trouble them.
In the back row sat Tituba, the Barbadian servant who cared for the girls while Mrs. Parris lay ill again. The congregation shifted uneasily on the hard benches. Some whispered prayers against the Devil; others waited almost eagerly for a convulsion to break the monotony of winter and sermon alike. All eyes fixed on the girls, and they knew it.
It was a small, tense world contained in a single wooden room: the godly and the unfree, the fearful and the curious. Outside, rain turned the lanes to black mud. Inside, the storm gathering in Salem had already begun.
Salem’s people did not think of themselves as cruel. They were devout, literate, and convinced they lived in covenant with God, that their survival depended on their collective faithfulness. Sin was contagion; any corruption could draw divine wrath. When a home burned or a harvest failed, they saw warning, not chance. And they searched for someone to blame.
When Faith Turned to Fire
What began as curiosity about two frightened girls soon became a spiritual firestorm. The Puritans believed invisible forces governed the visible world and that Satan sought to destroy the godly from within.
When the village physician, unable to find a natural cause for the girls’ afflictions, declared that “the Devil’s hand is in it,” he gave theological panic medical sanction.
Pressed to name their tormentors, the girls accused Tituba, Sarah Good, and Sarah Osborne: a servant, a beggar, and a sickly widow. The choice was convenient: people already on the edge of respectability.
After that, the contagion spread. More girls, and soon grown women, fell into fits: choking, screaming, collapsing, contorting as if seized by invisible hands. To those watching, it looked like open war with Hell itself.
The accusations spread like sparks in dry tinder. Confession became the only refuge, but a poisonous one. Those who confessed and accused others were spared temporarily. Those who refused to confess, who would not lie in God’s court to save themselves, were hanged. It was the most devout, the most steadfast, who died. Their faith, unbending in the face of falsehood, sealed their fate.
Salem’s logic was flawless in its own perverse way. It turned holiness inside out, making innocence indistinguishable from pride and mercy indistinguishable from weakness. The pious could not see that they were devouring their own.
The meetinghouse that once echoed with psalms now rang with the names of neighbors. Confession, once the path to grace, became the price of survival. The Devil no longer needed to walk through Salem; the people of Salem were doing his work for him.
Grace Under Siege
As the trials gained momentum, the ministers split, and none more painfully than the Mathers.
Increase Mather, president of Harvard and the colony’s leading theologian, was among the first to doubt spectral evidence: the claim that a victim’s vision of a tormentor’s spirit proved guilt. At first, his protest was academic, but as executions mounted and respected churchgoers died, his concern deepened into horror. He came to see that the courts had killed not witches but neighbors, and that righteousness, untempered by mercy, had become sin.
His young son Cotton Mather, brilliant and ambitious, saw the trials as a proving ground for holiness. He urged boldness, preaching that hesitation in the face of evil was complicity. Cotton’s confidence gave the hysteria its moral vocabulary.
When Rev. George Burroughs, a minister himself, was condemned, the divide between father and son became tragedy. Burroughs stood in the execution cart beneath the hanging tree, the noose tight around his throat, and recited the Lord’s Prayer flawlessly — something witches were said to be unable to do. The crowd wavered. Then Cotton Mather, watching nearby, warned that Satan could mimic holiness. The hesitation died. The driver snapped the reins, and the cart lurched forward. Burroughs swung.
It was the moment grace itself was silenced. The colony’s brightest young preacher mistook zeal for discernment, and a man of God died for it. Somewhere in Boston, Increase Mather must have felt the weight of what his son’s certainty, and his own delay, had helped unleash.
When the Fire Reached the Great House
By autumn 1692, nineteen had been hanged, one pressed to death, and more than two hundred jailed. Respectable citizens now stood accused. Then came the unthinkable: Lady Mary Phipps, wife of the governor, was named among the bewitched.
Gov. William Phipps, newly returned from the frontier, halted the special Court of Oyer and Terminer called to try the hundreds of witchcraft cases and forbade further executions. Fear had reached the ruling class, and self-preservation achieved what conscience had not.
Only afterward did Increase Mather and other senior clergy issue their declaration against spectral evidence, warning that the Devil could deceive even the righteous. His words were just, but too late. They were the voice of repentance, not resistance.
The persecutions ended not through enlightenment but exhaustion. Grace entered only after terror had spent itself.
The Year of Repentance
When the last prisoner was freed, the colony numbered barely sixty thousand souls. More than two hundred had been jailed, over three hundred warrants issued. In Salem Village, a hamlet of five hundred, nearly every family had lost a friend or neighbor.
The end came with silence. Jails overflowed, crops rotted, and even true believers began to doubt. When the court was dissolved, the prisoners were released. None of the accusers recanted.
Gov. Phipps declared a day of fasting and prayer. Jurors confessed error; the colony paid restitution to victims’ families. The pulpits that had thundered against witches now thundered against pride. But no ritual could restore what was lost: faith in one another.
Today, the name Salem means something else. The Puritan village that once trembled at the Devil’s presence now sells his image. Shops trade in pentagrams and spell books; October brings costumed crowds to streets once soaked in fear. Descendants of accusers and victims alike profit from the tragedy that damned their ancestors. The deepest irony is that what was a Christian-on-Christian persecution — a failure of grace — has become a festival of witchcraft.
The New Puritans
The fever that consumed Salem has been tamed into folklore, but the impulse behind it endures: the hunger for purity, the fear of contagion, the need for a scapegoat. It has merely changed its language.
Today’s America is no less religious, only less aware of it. The Puritan Elect, those who proved salvation through visible righteousness, have returned in secular form. The new Elect display virtue through slogans and denunciations. The new sinners are those who hesitate to join in.
Where the Puritans feared hidden sin, we fear hidden prejudice. Where they hunted witches, we hunt offenders. To be accused is to be half-condemned; to deny guilt is to deepen suspicion. Repentance must be public, performative, and endless, a penance without absolution.
As in Salem, the outcasts suffer first. The strange (or weird), the unfashionable, the politically incorrect become scapegoats for the community’s fear. The vocabulary has changed, but the moral geometry is the same: purity enforced by fear, grace nowhere to be found.
The Algorithmic Inquisition
The Puritans needed no technology to spread panic. Rumor galloped from hearth to hearth in a day. Ours is wired, yet gossip travels faster still. Social media has given Salem a global pulpit. Outrage is instantaneous, permanent, and rewarded.
The algorithm is our new minister, amplifying accusation and burying forgiveness. Each retweet or share becomes a cry of “Witch!” — a small exorcism that absolves the accuser for another day.
But hysteria always burns out. As zeal cools, weariness takes its place. People no longer believe the charges, yet they no longer believe in innocence either. They scroll through scandals with a dull fatalism, expecting corruption everywhere.
We live in our own late Salem: not of flames and ropes, but of cold suspicion. Neighbors no longer accuse; they simply assume guilt. Institutions are distrusted, truth is provisional, and grace, once the lifeblood of faith, has been replaced by irony. Salem ended in exhaustion. So, perhaps, will we.
When the Fire Reaches the Great House Again
Every frenzy ends the same way. It burns outward until it touches power, and then it stops. In 1692, the fever broke when the governor’s wife was accused. Fear for the powerful ended the hunt.
So it is now. Our modern inquisitions — political, cultural, medical, environmental — follow the same rhythm. At their height, dissent was heresy. Then the accusations crept upward. Public figures who enforced the rules found themselves accused of hypocrisy or error. Data shifted; predictions failed. The high priests of certainty began to fall silent.
The same voices that demanded obedience now call for “nuance.” The same institutions that punished doubt now plead for “dialogue.” When the contagion of moral certainty finally threatens those who set it in motion, the tune changes. When power begins to suffer from the purity it preached, the fever breaks.
But what follows is not healing, only emptiness. The inquisitors retreat, the faithful drift into irony, and a civilization once sure of its virtue finds itself adrift in cynicism. The fire has gone out, but the ash remains.
The End of Grace
When the last ropes were cut down from the hanging tree, the people of Salem faced a question they had never asked before: How could believers in Christ do such things to one another? They answered with fasting and prayer, but something sacred had broken. Their covenant world, once bound by God’s favor, now lived in the shadow of its own sin. Righteousness, they learned, can kill when stripped of mercy.
We stand in that shadow still. Our witch hunts wear new language but the same spirit: the belief that purity can be achieved by punishment. We have traded the cross for the algorithm, both promising salvation through condemnation.
What we have lost is grace: the belief that humans are fallen, forgiveness possible, truth inseparable from humility. Without grace, faith becomes ideology and justice vengeance. The Puritans hanged their neighbors in God’s name; the left destroys theirs in the name of progress. The Devil’s victory is not disbelief but self-righteousness, persuading the righteous that they need no mercy.
Grace waits still, patient as ever, for a people willing to see themselves truthfully again. Salem’s story endures because it is ours: the tale of a faithful nation that mistook zeal for holiness, and learned too late that without grace, every age becomes Salem again.
Epilogue: The Anti-Elect
The Puritans believed God had chosen His own before time began. Nothing could alter that decree, but a lifetime of piety might reveal its signs. Their world revolved around this invisible hierarchy — the Elect and the Reprobate — and the fear of never knowing which one you were.
That anxiety lives on in secular form. The progressive new moral order divides humanity by birthright, only in reverse. Instead of the Elect, we have the Anti-Elect, those marked not for salvation but for guilt. “Privilege,” like predestination, is inherited and ineradicable. Skin color, ancestry, sex, and orientation decide moral rank. The old saints proved holiness through visible conduct; the new guilty prove awareness through public confession. Silence is damnation.
The resemblance is uncanny. The Puritan feared hidden sin; the modern progressive fears hidden prejudice. Both seek proof of purity rather than truth of heart. And neither offers forgiveness. Moral standing is fixed and fragile, dependent on the gaze of others, sustained by fear.
Whether we call ourselves chosen or condemned, we are still living by the logic of predestination, a world where identity, not repentance, determines destiny. The Puritans built their church on it; we have built our politics. And in both, mercy has no place.
Only grace can end such a cycle. Without it, righteousness hardens into hierarchy, compassion curdles into control, and every people eventually becomes its own Salem.
Join the conversation as a VIP Member