YOU WON’T EVEN WIN BACK MARRIED WOMEN:

Related:

EXCLUSIVE: Trump Admin Strips Benefits From Thousands Of Aliens On Terror Watchlist. “Customs and Border Protection (CBP) has identified 6,300 individuals who were paroled into the United States since 2023, during the Biden administration, but are on the FBI’s Terrorist Screening Center or have a criminal record, a senior White House official shared with the Caller. The source was granted anonymity to discuss the details not yet announced. Every individual CBP identified is having their parole, which gives them benefits such as work authorization, stripped immediately, the official told the Caller.”

HIGHER EDUCATION BUBBLE UPDATE:

ALLIES:

THE NEW SPACE RACE:

I’d say, “Faster, please,” but those launch windows don’t take requests.

CURIOUSLY, HARLEY OWNERS AREN’T ALL THAT FASTIDIOUS ABOUT PRONOUN CHOICES:

More here: Harley-Davidson CEO Jochen Zeitz To Retire. Zeitz to remain at the helm until a successor is found.

HOW IT STARTED: Twitter Admits ‘Error,’ Reinstates ZeroHedge After Banning It for Calling Out China.

Twitter admits it wrongfully banned the site ZeroHedge, but its history of selective enforcement is still infamous.

The COVID-19 virus’s origins, lethality, and cures have been hotly debated throughout 2020, to the point where social media platforms have heavily restricted many users’ posts. As a rare exception, one website has been reinstated after users thought it was gone forever. “133 days after Twitter ‘permanently’ banned Zero Hedge on January 31, the social network has reinstated us after admitting it made an error,” skeptic outlet ZeroHedge revealed June 14.

Twitter previously banned ZeroHedge’s account for allegedly violating Twitter’s platform manipulation policy by theorizing about the Wuhan virus’s origins. The initial ZeroHedge article suggested that the mainstream narrative about coronavirus being spread thanks to some bat soup was a “fabricated farce.”

NewsBusters, June 15th, 2020.

How it’s going:

As Kate of Small Dead Animals tweets, “I can’t wait for Karoline Leavitt to call on ‘Tyler Durden.'”

JEFF DUNETZ: Where’s Moses? A Passover Question.

During the Seder, we tell the story of the Exodus from Egypt. But the Haggadah, the book that acts as the script for the Seder, only mentions Moses once. Only once? He’s the key human figure in the biblical Exodus story?     

Yes, THAT Moses… Prophet, miracle deliverer, G-d’s right-hand man, mountain climber, former tennis player, and a prince of Egypt. Former tennis player? Absolutely! The Torah says Moses served in the courts of Pharaoh.

Much of the Haggadah was put together by Rabbis after the destruction of the Second Temple in Jerusalem. It was created so Jews would have a guideline for the Passover Seders and to fulfill the Torah commandment to remember that G-d took our ancestors out of Egypt with a strong hand and outstretched arm.

Before the Romans destroyed the Second Temple, animal sacrifices were a big part of the holiday ritual, as required by the Torah. But those sacrifices were only allowed at the Beit Mikdash (the Holy Temple atop the Temple Mount). Sacrifices ended with the Temple’s destruction. Well, either the destruction of the Beit Mikdash or an anticipation that PETA would be created.

By the way, nothing in the Torah or Haggadah says that after the festival ends, Jews must have a week of leftover brisket after Passover. Sadly, it happens anyway.

Heh, indeed. Read the whole thing.™

TECHNOLOGY MARCHES ON: First Look: The Return of the Franklin Armory Reformation. A unique take on a firearm is once again available for sale. “Franklin Armory is resuming production and sales of its Reformation firearm. Based on the ruling issued last month in its prevailing lawsuit against the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, the company will begin shipping a variety of Reformation model configurations to dealers for sale to consumers. The Reformation features Franklin Armory’s patented straight-cut land-and-groove design and is classified as neither a rifle nor a shotgun. Rather, Reformation is simply a “firearm” that is regulated only by the Gun Control Act (GCA) of 1968. Since Reformation is not a National Firearms Act (NFA) firearm, no tax stamp is required. FFLs can now transfer Reformation as a GCA-only firearm just like other similarly classified firearms, including the Mossberg Shockwave, Remington Tac-14 and Franklin Armory’s own XO-26. Both 7.5-inch and 11.5-inch barrel length versions of the Reformation are now available for purchase through Franklin Armory’s dealer network in most US states.”

GOOD QUESTION:

The Left’s long march through the institutions was a smashing success and won’t be turned back easily or without constant vigilance — particularly on the part of people who should know better.

THAT’S MORE THAN YOU CAN GET FROM A CERTAIN SCOTUS JUSTICE: What is a woman? London’s Supreme Court to answer.

The Supreme Court in London is set to decide what defines a woman in a ruling next week, a matter that’s become an international debate.

Scottish courts have considered a law, the 2010 Equality Act, applies across Great Britain, according to the BBC. A lower Scottish court had ruled against a women’s group bringing the challenge. The lower court said biology does not define sex.

The appeal is now before the Supreme Court in London.

The women’s group, For Women Scotland, argues that sex is based on biology.

The Scottish government, meanwhile, says the law requires gender recognition based on an individual’s certificate, which can be changed after birth.

Arguments were heard last year in the dispute, but a decision is expected to be announced Wednesday, with the high court deciding what defines “sex.”

It seems insane that courts in previously well-run countries have to rule on basic biology… because it is insane.

JUST LIKE THE SOVIETS HELPED FUND THE PEACE MOVEMENT, BUT MUCH MORE EFFECTIVE:

OH, TO BE IN ENGLAND: The Unbounded Anti-Semitism of the BBC.

Anyone who has seen the BBC’s coverage of Gaza and Israel since October 7—among them the 1.1 billion people who look at the BBC’s news site every month, making it the most widely read on the planet—will have seen how slanted its reporting is. But the problem began decades before October 7, and it is now difficult—impossible, really—to argue the case I tried to make on that panel. The evidence suggests that the problem with the BBC’s coverage of Israel is far broader and stems from its attitude to Jews themselves. Even Danny Cohen, former controller of BBC One, the corporation’s main broadcast channel, now says the organization is guilty of “systemic problems of antisemitism and bias.”

Whatever the history, it has come to a head in a documentary broadcast by the BBC in February called Gaza: How to Survive a War Zone. Though it was ostensibly a piece of independent journalism showing the impact of the Gaza war on its 13-year-old narrator, within hours of its transmission, it emerged that the boy was in fact the son of a minister in Gaza’s Hamas government. Equally egregious examples of the distortions in the program were uncovered subsequently.

The discovery that Abdullah al-Yazouri, the 13-year-old, was the son of Hamas official Ayman al-Yazouri was the work of David Collier, a retired businessman who has turned his attention in recent years to online research. He says it took him less than three hours to find out the boy’s background. The BBC now says it asked the film’s producers, Hoyo Films, whether there were anything of concern about the boy and was told there was nothing. It does not seem to have occurred to anyone at the world’s (self-proclaimed) leading news organization that it should and could check for itself. Not a single one of its 5,500 journalists was asked by managers or editors to take a look at the film to check its bona fides.

That seems unlikely to have been a mere oversight. Rather, it is a byproduct of the mindset that dominates the BBC’s thinking. If your worldview is that Israel is by definition evil and Gazans virtuous, you will always be ready to accept anything that seems to buttress such a view.

Related: ‘Reverts?’ The BBC is spouting Islamist talking points.

We have become accustomed to the BBC adopting the language of trans activists. ‘Gender care’ is how the UK’s supposedly impartial state broadcaster refers to the scandalous process of sterilising children who are confused about their sex. ‘Preferred pronouns’ are rigorously observed for men who claim to be women. Could we now be seeing something similar at the BBC where Islamic fundamentalists are concerned?

Whether wittingly or not, an article published on the BBC News website on Friday essentially declared Islam to be humanity’s one true faith. It was a fairly anodyne, magazine-style piece about how people who convert to Islam can sometimes feel lonely during Eid, the holiday that marks the end of Ramadan. Yet in the headline, and peppered throughout the piece, it referred to these converts as ‘reverts’ – a term loaded with Islamist ideology.

“Gender care?” “Preferred pronouns?” Islamic “reverts?” If, as F. Scott Fitzgerald wrote, “the test of a first-rate intelligence is the ability to hold two opposed ideas in the mind at the same time, and still retain the ability to function,” the Beep is functioning surprisingly well. But as Fraser Myers of Spiked wrote, “There’s been no Islamist takeover of the Beeb, of course. The problem is that in the BBC’s PC worldview, Muslims are seen as a perpetually oppressed group. The BBC then seeks to rectify this alleged oppression through ‘positive representation’ in its content, and by letting self-appointed activists have editorial influence. ”

CHRISTOPHER RUFO AND DAVID REABOI: How “Tesla Takedown” Activists Fool the Public. The campaign against Elon Musk’s company is hardly a grassroots movement.

The Tesla Takedown isn’t merely a protest; it is an exercise in pressure politics. Tesla was the pressure point, and Elon Musk was the proxy for the forces of capitalism, fascism, and oppression. The campaign reflects a calculated application of the diversity of tactics approach, blending nonviolent protests with strategic acts of property damage intended to generate fear and economic pain.

The campaign’s architects knew that neither protests nor arson alone could delegitimize Tesla. But together—through contrast, escalation, and repetition—they could push public opinion, dampen consumer enthusiasm, and threaten capital flow.

Ultimately, the anti-Tesla campaign reveals the strategic logic driving modern protest movements. The Left relies on weaponized ambiguity, using its professional flank to draw headlines and its militant wing to impose costs and thereby achieve political objectives.

Because of the campaign’s massive scope, as well as First Amendment constraints, law enforcement and policymakers have been slow to recognize the far-left’s activist ecosystem. Those responsible for our security need to understand how violent and nonviolent agitators work together to advance their revolutionary goals.

Read the whole thing.