Premium

How Pennsylvania ‘Flipped’ Blue: Non-Citizens and Fraudulent Dem Voters Exposed

Catherine Salgado/PJ Media

So how did the Democrats flip Pennsylvania blue? There’s more and more evidence to indicate what some of us suspected all along — that there was a whole lot of fraud involved.

As part of the latest Trump administration exposé on election fraud, the Department of Homeland Security stated that preliminary findings indicate at least 14,576 non-citizens on Pennsylvania voter rolls. In 2024-2025, citizen volunteers managed to pressure Pennsylvania into finally removing about 20,000 people off the voter rolls who had moved out of Pennsylvania, and therefore could no longer vote there. In November 2025, Judicial Watch reported that there were 100,000 non-citizens on Pennsylvania voter rolls. 

And below you can see another update from election integrity warrior Scott Presler, who secured the removal of 2,053 likely Democrat voters who were not allowed to be registered:

Let’s engage in a hypothetical exercise, using the 2022 Pennsylvania Senate election as an example, not because I know it was fraudulent, but just to give some context on numbers. John Fetterman beat Mehmet Oz by about 263,700 votes, according to NBC News. It was an upset, switching a red Senate seat blue. 

If you add up the number of illicit names on rolls identified since then, based on the DHS and citizen volunteer numbers, there’s up to 36,629 potential fraudulent votes. If you use the numbers from Judicial Watch also, it’s up to 122,053 potential fraudulent votes. Suddenly, the gap between Fetterman and Oz is not so great. And yes, there were allegations of fraud in that election. Rather ironically, Fetterman has since praised Oz — who is now in charge of Medicare and Medicaid for the Trump administration — for rooting out healthcare fraud.

RelatedWhite House Fact-Checks Media’s Election Fraud Cover-Up Lies

And while Republicans love to point out that Fetterman is not nearly as radical as his counterparts, particularly when it comes to Israel, he is just as radical on other issues. For instance, he voted against legislation to provide life-saving care to babies born alive after a botched abortion, meaning he literally voted to support infanticide. It would still, of course, be much better to have a solid Republican in the seat instead of Fetterman, who might sometimes talk a good game, but who generally votes with the Democrats. 

Elections have consequences, and corrupted voter rolls have consequences. Why are Democrats so horrified at the proposition that they need to clean out their voter rolls unless they know that there is something wrong with the rolls?

By the way, if you want a really disturbing exercise in hypothetical election fraud, take a look at this:

In light of all this information, the flip of Pennsylvania from red to blue in recent years is much more understandable. It is not necessarily that Pennsylvania voters suddenly decided they preferred the Democrat Party. There’s a lot more here than meets the eye, which is precisely why Pennsylvania Democrats have been fighting the Trump administration in court over reforming their voter rolls.

Recommended

Trending on PJ Media Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement