Chronicling the ongoing intersectional struggle to liberate women — inclusively defined as the legacy kind and the transgenders — from The Patriarchy™, one microaggression at a time.
Abortionist defends Charlie Kirk murder, doesn’t understand free speech
This sociopath — probably a heavily medicated liberal arts student, with a septum piercing, pink hair, that stupid signature haircut all of these harpies have, and pharmaceutical eyes that never blink — apparently thought this surreptitiously recorded conversation with her father was a big enough W that she should post it to TikTok.
In so doing, she demonstrated yet again, in my humble opinion, why giving women, especially Zoomer women, the right to vote was a massive mistake that might just be the downfall of Western civilization.
Liberal Tiktoker argues with dad about Charlie Kirk pic.twitter.com/LZL3EKqx1E
— shellshock (@shellshockkk) September 11, 2025
Her argument in favor of broad-daylight executions was that Charlie Kirk once allegedly said that if his daughter were raped, he would want her to go through with the pregnancy.
Related: HuffPo Feminist Quits Shaving to Protest for Abortion Rights
Her patient father tries valiantly to explain that the concept of free speech means that people you disagree with ought to be able to say things without getting shot in the throat in 4K, to which she rolls her eyes and makes obnoxious Zoomer faces into the camera for the benefit of her TikTok audience.
This discourse is not anomalous.
I have literally had this almost-verbatim conversation, in a slightly different context, with a family member who once became irate that she had driven by a private business with a poster depicting then-president Obama as Curious George, the curious little monkey.
She insisted it should be taken down and wanted to call the police.
I tried to explain, like trying to reason with a rabid wild animal, that, while arguably in poor taste depending on one’s sensibilities, turning Obama into Curious George, the curious little monkey absolutely fell under the purview of free speech. There was no direct incitement to violence; we don’t live in North Korea; satirizing heads of state is our sacred right as Americans.
She was unable to grasp the concept that people should be allowed to express sentiments that hurt her feelings, and so our conversation ended in stalemate, with her comfortably ensconced in a delusional bubble of moral righteousness.
Related: Physician: Libs Experiencing ‘9/11-Style’ Trauma After MAGA Takeover
E. Jean Carroll, alleged sexual assault victim, meticulously dolled herself up to look 'f**k-able' for Trump jury trial
This total fruitcake can’t stop doing the liberal media circuit reliving the highlight of her life, posing as a feminist icon as Trump’s alleged rape victim thirty years ago in a crowded department store that there were no witnesses to and that she never mentioned until he became president.
No one has ever enjoyed the limelight as an alleged celebrity rape victim more than E. Jean Carroll.
As you might recall, she appeared with CNN’s Anderson Cooper in what was supposed to be a PR exercise to sell her to the public.
Instead, much to Cooper’s visceral discomfort, she described rape as “sexy” before some panicked producer immediately cut to break.
Well, she’s back for more attention, describing on The Bulwark how she went to great lengths to make herself look “f**k-able” so that the jury would buy her story. She explains that she hired a stylist to do her hair and trial costume to make her look, in exact detail, like she did in 1996.“It was a trick,” she concedes.
Like Cooper, the host clearly couldn’t believe what he was hearing, but had to play it cool because such are the sacrifices one has to make to maintain the party mythology.
E. Jean Carroll says she had to trick the jury by making herself look fuckable... she goes on to say that she is glad it worked...
— Spitfire (@DogRightGirl) September 8, 2025
This bish needs to be prosecuted.
pic.twitter.com/je4QF0ehu6
