It would be nice to believe what we learned in public school civics class when Mr. Bill went to Capitol Hill or whatever — that rule of law prevails and all citizens of this great land have the right to a redress of their grievances through jurisprudence — but the unfortunate reality is that justice only wins out under certain conditions, which include, in the context of COVID:
- An honest, uncorrupted Department of Justice
- An honest, uncorrupted judiciary
- Transparent governmental processes for approving and vetting drugs
Related: Free Speech Loss: Government, Facebook Win ‘Anti-Vaccine’ Censorship Lawsuit
None of these conditions currently exist and will continue to remain absent until some serious draining of the swamp occurs — a cleansing at least 100-deep of the leadership in every major agency.
For functional purposes, the government is Pfizer, and Pfizer is the government; ne’er do their interests diverge. Someone has to untangle the mess so that they may begin to function as intended once more instead of colluding with one another to promote their own interests and screw the average Joe.
Whether Trump is up to the job or not (he certainly didn’t #DraintheSwamp the first time around) is up in the air, but what’s clear is that he’s the current only hope for achieving those goals. The Karamel-uh entity certainly isn’t going to lift a finger to bring justice to the criminals who perpetrated what, in my view, is the greatest crime against humanity in recorded history. And the federal bench hasn’t been much help either.
Via Children’s Health Defense (emphasis added):
For the second time, a federal court in Texas has dismissed a whistleblower lawsuit alleging Pfizer and two of its contractors manipulated data and committed other acts of fraud during clinical trials for the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine in 2020.
In his Aug. 9 ruling, District Judge Michael J. Truncale sided with the U.S. government, ruling the government had demonstrated “good cause” to intervene and dismiss the case*. He wrote:
“The Government’s desire to dismiss the case — because of its doubt as to the case’s merits, differing assessment of the Pfizer vaccine data, desire to avoid discovery and litigation obligations, and belief that it should not have to expend resources in a case that is contrary to its public health policy — constitutes good cause to intervene.”…
According to the lawsuit, the three companies “deliberately withheld crucial information from the United States that calls the safety and efficacy of their vaccine into question,” thus defrauding the federal government, which purchased the vaccines.
The FCA allows the government or a party suing on its behalf to attempt to recover money for false claims made by parties to secure payment from the government.
*Why is the government interceding on behalf of Pfizer? Why not let the case move forward and it be adjudicated based on its merits? If it has none, why not let the record show that and put all the conspiracy theorizing to bed once and for all? Why not a little daylight here?
We know that Pfizer committed fraud in its COVID vaxx trials, thanks to whistleblowers — the question is whether courts will allow the evidence to be submitted in court and whether the DOJ is ever going to do anything about it.
Via British Medical Journal, November 2021 (emphasis added):
A regional director who was employed at the research organisation Ventavia Research Group [the researchers tasked with vetting the vaccine safety and efficacy] has told The BMJ that the company falsified data, unblinded patients, employed inadequately trained vaccinators, and was slow to follow up on adverse events reported in Pfizer’s pivotal phase III trial….
"There’s just a complete lack of oversight of contract research organisations and independent clinical research facilities," says Jill Fisher, professor of social medicine at the University of North Carolina School of Medicine.
