Is Obama Just a Hapless Putz?
[jwplayer player="1" mediaid="4587"]
In an interview the other day, I was asked what the president might've been thinking when he instigated the chaos on our borders with his talk of pen-and-phone amnesty. Half a dozen things went through my mind. Maybe he's trying some sort of Cloward-Piven maneuver: an attempt to overwhelm our welfare state to the point where we replace it with "a guaranteed annual income and thus an end to poverty." Or maybe he's just trying to flood the population with Democrat voters. Or maybe he feels America stole its southland from Hispanic people anyway and it's up to him to give it back.
The president's not an idiot so obviously he intended to accomplish something by bringing this humanitarian disaster down upon the heads of ourselves and the children of Central America. What exactly was it?
Then, after the interview, it suddenly occurred to me: What difference, at this point, does it make what the president is thinking? What difference does it make what he intends? Intentions, as every conservative knows, don't dictate results. While, in the moment, he has put the lives of thousands of children, the health of Americans and the nation's security at risk, the end game is out of his control and may — almost assuredly will — be entirely different from what he expects.
Cloward-Piven, for instance, has always struck me as an idiot strategy. The idea that you can cause chaos and then predict what will come out of that chaos makes absolutely no sense. If our welfare state were overwhelmed, who knows what would come out of it? Hell, maybe it would be the end of the welfare state. I can dream, can't I?