Newsweek: Stolen Pr0n?
August 7th, 2012 - 3:48 pm
It’s one thing to try and sell magazines with mock-titilating covers. It’s another to just grab some over-used stock photo.
Politico calls it “the best Newsweek cover yet.”
They would.
This just means that TIME is sure to do a cover story on peaches this week.
Melons
Newsweek? What’s that?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=85cL1HisrNc
Oops, looks like someone beat me to it.
“So, venturing out of politics for a just a second, I want to mention something: The latest Newsweek cover is really bad.”
That’s the second paragraph of the article you linked at Politico – “the best Newsweek cover yet.”
I don’t know how the editors at Politico came up with the headline (sarcasm?), but the article that follows isn’t kind at all and actually is quite accurate (to my surprise).
I don’t like misleading headlines. Or Politico. Or you either not reading the article or being misleading with your subhead and snide comment “they would”.
Jeez, let the leftists do this crap, we should avoid it.
Give the Politico and Dylan Byers their due when they call out Tina Brown and Newsweek.
Or, maybe you were just being ironic. Hell, it’s hard to tell without being able to decipher when someone writes in sarcasm or irony.
I reckon I’m just pissed that you led me to link to Politico and find they actually had an accurate article. I didn’t think they ever did and now my world view is shattered.
I could be writing in sarcasm or irony. Who’s to know?
No no, it’s a Totally different and original cover! See, look at the differences when We compare them in Photoshop. Totally not the same image.
/sarc
Quick, what do Newsweek’s asparagus photo and Hardee’s Monster Thickburger have in common? They both qualify as “food porn”.