I’ll never be able to retrace the virtual steps which led me to this live & acoustic version of Billy Idol’s “Rebel Yell.” But that’s OK, because I bookmarked the heck out of it, if only for that epic guitar work.
Pete Kasperowicz reports for The Blaze that over 300,000 people received excess ♡bamaCare!!! subsidies last year:
When all the overpayments are added up, it comes to $305.2 million, the report said. That’s an average of about $840 per person in excess subsidies.
As of February, about half of that $305.2 million had been repaid, and half had not, the report added.
It’s been known for more about a year that officials implementing Obamacare were having problems with the premium tax credit that will help millions of people afford to buy health insurance under the law. Since early 2014, Rep. Diane Black (R-Tenn.) and others have said the administration needs to do more to verify the eligibility of people taking these subsidies, to ensure there are not huge overpayments.
Under Obamacare, people can qualify for tax subsidies if they earn anywhere from the federal poverty level and four times that amount. The less people make, the more subsidy they receive.
But because the subsidy is given out in advance, it can lead to complications when people file their taxes. If their income rose during the year, for example, they could be in a position of having received too much of a subsidy, and they may have to pay some of it back.
The IG report said only about 90,000 of the returns claiming an Obamacare tax credit received the amount of subsidy they should have received, or about 12 percent.
I’m so old I remember when one of ♡bamaCare!!!’s big selling points was that it was going to eliminate waste and fraud.
But here’s where it gets really wasteful and perhaps fraudulent:
The IG report said only about 90,000 of the returns claiming an Obamacare tax credit received the amount of subsidy they should have received, or about 12 percent.
12 percent? Are you freakin’ kidding me? ♡bamaCare!!! has a 12% accuracy rate? It gets the subsidies wrong 88% of the time?
The fun part is that ♡bamaCare!!! can’t get it right when relatively few people are buying through the exchanges. That’s set to change — and in a big way — in 2018, when the Cadillac Tax kicks in, and it will behoove businesses to kick people off of employer-based insurance by the millions.
And remember, all of this extra paperwork is handled by you — and by the happy smiling angels of the Internal Revenue Service.
Islamic State has released a new set of disturbing propaganda photos, showing off their growing number of military markets in Iraq and Syria.
With the fighting fiercer than ever, the extremist group have already started to convert local markets to supply the growing number of barbarous jihadis in their ranks.
Even young children appear to be allowed to browse through the market, with some of the children wearing their own miniature uniforms.
This is nothing new, of course. We’ve long grown used to seeing Palestinian children dressed up as suicide bombers or carrying automatic weapons — sometimes real ones. If you go to the darker places on the web, you can find videos of Muslim children being trained in the fine art of human decaptiation and other forms of slaughter.
What’s different about ISIS is the sheer scale of the area they hold — and that much of that area formerly belonged to a US client state, since abandoned by our own President.
An important question from Byron York:
What accounts for the Democrats’ dramatic change from the party of youth to the party of age?
And now the answer:
“It’s the snuffing out of young talent by the strength and size and sheer velocity of the inevitable nominee,” says a well-connected Democratic strategist. “The Clintons took all the air out of the collective Democratic room. There are a lot of people who would be running who are much younger, but they’ve got their future in front of them, and they don’t want the Clintons to ruin it, in this campaign or after this campaign. So they’re waiting for a moment when there is enough oxygen to run.”
“If Hillary Clinton weren’t running, we’d have a field that looks like the Republican field — young and vibrant and diverse.”
It’s always all about the Clintons, isn’t it?
Anthony Cordesman just absolutely rips the Obama Administration, Congress, and our Big Strategic Thinkers massive new ones:
The United States now faces a rapidly evolving world filled with new challenges at a time when real-world defense planning is focused on budget cuts, when U.S. “strategy” lacks plans and program budgets, and when talk of strategic partnership lacks clear and specific direction. Far too much U.S. strategic rhetoric is a hollow shell, while the real U.S. national security posture is based on suboptimizing the budget around the fiscal ceilings set by the Budget Control Act (BCA), persisting in issuing empty concepts and strategic rhetoric, and dealing with immediate problems out of any broader strategic context.
The end result resembles an exercise in chaos theory.
That is all.
More than half of some 770,000 soldiers are pessimistic about their future in the military and nearly as many are unhappy in their jobs, despite a six-year, $287 million campaign to make troops more optimistic and resilient, findings obtained by USA TODAY show.
Twelve months of data through early 2015 show that 403,564 soldiers, or 52%, scored badly in the area of optimism, agreeing with statements such as “I rarely count on good things happening to me.” Forty-eight percent have little satisfaction in or commitment to their jobs.
All kidding aside, because this is a serious issue involving some of the finest men and women this country has to offer — but it’s going to take a lot more than six years and a few hundred million dollars to undo eight years of President Obama.
It’s going to take leadership.
South Korea is stuck between a rock and a hard place. After news leaked that the United States is exploring the possibility of deploying a Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) battery in South Korea to counter North Korean missile threats, China voiced a strong objection, claiming that such a deployment would threaten its security. If the U.S. decides to make a formal request, Seoul will face an uncomfortable choice between its indispensable security provider and its largest trading partner – and China might not like the result.
China claims that THAAD – in particular the Army Navy/Transportable Radar Surveillance and Control Model 2 (AN/TPY-2) X-band radar that would accompany the interceptors – is unnecessary to counter North Korean missiles. Many Chinese analysts believe that, in fact, an overly hyped North Korean threat is Washington’s excuse to justify deployment of a system that actually targets China. [Emphasis added]
This is the same gambit repeated again and again by the Russians — that missile defense somehow “targets” someone.
But missile defense just kind of… sits there, until you need it. Like homeowner’s insurance. THAAD doesn’t threaten anybody — all it can do is knock down incoming enemy missiles. In other words, China doesn’t like THAAD because they worry it won’t allow them to use missiles as blackmail against their neighbors.
That’s not “targeting.” That’s keeping your friends a little safer from gangsters acting like gangsters.
Deploy THAAD already.
If this image excites you, if the thought that a person who has not driven a own in 20 years and who has most of a great nation’s news media carrying tons of water for her, somehow engages you because she just spent three hours in coach and briefly touched her own suitcase, while on her way to “a top-secret meeting with Democratic Party insiders who were told to surrender their cell phones and cameras beforehand…”
… then you might be a liberal.
A Czech man named Vit Jedlicka proclaimed the new republic between Serbia and Croatia on the western bank of the Danube on Monday and has been doing the media rounds all week. With a land area of about 2.7 square miles, Liberland would be the world’s third-smallest country, after the Vatican City and Monaco. According to its website, it has a flag, a motto (“to live and let live”), and an official language (Czech, which seems ill-advised). Jedlicka is taking applications for citizenship, though you’ll have to apply by email because there’s no post office yet. Liberlanders must be people who:
have respect for other people and respect the opinions of others, regardless of their race, ethnicity, orientation, or religion
have respect for private ownership which is untouchable
do not have communist, nazi or other extremist past
were not punished for past criminal offences
Still a member of the Czech Republic’s libertarian, euroskeptic Party of Free Citizens, Jedlicka says he is working on writing a constitution that “significantly limits the power of politicians so they could not interfere too much in the freedoms of the Liberland nation.”
America hasn’t been the same since we closed the frontier and ran out of places to run away to — maybe the lawless areas of the Balkans, the Middle East, and someday perhaps Siberia could be made into new outlets for rugged individualists.
I got chills.
The weird part? The very last bit was a bit of a letdown — but the rest of it, nothin’ but chills.
The recent story of two Transportation Security Administration screeners at Denver International Airport manipulating full-body scanners in order to grope men’s crotches is disturbing, but it came as no surprise to me.
Over the course of my six years with the TSA, the leveraging of rules and surveillance tools to abuse passengers was a daily checkpoint occurrence. Has the TSA screener searching your luggage suddenly decided to share with you the finer points of official bag-search procedure just as your final boarding call is being announced? There’s a good chance that he or she just doesn’t like you. Or in some cases, as we’ve seen, it may be that the screener finds you attractive and wants to use the TSA rules as an excuse to get his or her hands on you.
Has any presidential candidate come out in favor of abolishing TSA? This could be a populist issue with staying power, and a good starting place for a discussion about privacy, security, and that old warning of Ben Franklin’s.
Japanese game show Sing What Happens seriously tests their male contestants’ karaoke skills by giving them hand jobs while they sing. The object of the game is for the contestants to know the song by heart and to not be distracted by the hand job. They need to be able to hit the proper notes—perfectly—in order to win. Sometimes a hand is used and other times feet are used for zee sexual gratification. The contestants must be able to carry a tune until they…
Until they… you know.
I have seen the future, and it includes Laurence Fishburne asking me to take either the red or blue pill. Apparently:
The Office of Naval Research has unveiled what it is calling the future of the American military’s drone technology—lightweight, flying killer robots that can swarm and overwhelm an adversary.
As more than 120 countries convened at the U.N. in Geneva to discuss the future of drone warfare this week, the Navy’s research arm announced it had started testing its LOCUST drones (Low-Cost UAV Swarming Technology). And while the acronym may conjure a kind of dystopian sci-fi nightmare, Navy scientists insist that LOCUST drones will give sailors and marines a tactical advantage on the battlefield.
Currently, the military relies on MQ-Reaper drones, one of which costs $16 million and requires the guiding hand of a human being. LOCUST drones are far smaller and cheaper, and they guide themselves, says the military. According to Engadget, when dispatched, “they team up and overwhelm enemy aircraft like honey bees defending their hive.”
Picture a Virginia-class nuclear attack sub. Now replace a few of its Tomahawk cruise missiles with a launchable container full of LOCUST drones. The container/missile pops out of the water, proceeds to its destination, then unleashes a swarm of LOCUST drones ready to strike.
Imagine putting the enemy aircraft-killing capabilities of an aircraft carrier in a stealthy underwater platform.
Granted, a sub would have to return to base to reload on LOCUST missiles, so it wouldn’t enjoy a surface aircraft carrier’s ability to sustain operations. But its stealthiness and survivability would make LOCUST-equipped SSNs a valuable addition to — not a replacement for — our carrier strike groups.
Politico reports that Hillary Clinton’s Wall Street backers have a “wink wink, nudge nudge” understanding about her populist rhetoric:
Hillary Clinton sounded like a woman on a mission after her long drive into the heartland: “There’s something wrong,” she told Iowans on Tuesday, when “hedge fund managers pay lower taxes than nurses or the truckers I saw on I-80 when I was driving here over the last two days.”
But back in Manhattan, the hedge fund managers who’ve long been part of her political and fundraising networks aren’t sweating the putdown and aren’t worrying about their take-home pay just yet.
It’s “just politics,” said one major Democratic donor on Wall Street, explaining that some of her Wall Street supporters doubt she would push hard for closing the carried interest loophole as president, a policy she promoted when she last ran in 2008.
There’s going to be a lot of populist rhetoric this cycle — from both sides. Honestly, I don’t care what a candidate threatens to do to Wall Street. What I care about deeply is what they promise to do to re-empower entrepreneurs and the middle class.
Must-read stuff from Cliff Asness in today’s WSJ:
While the administration might be forgiven for cheerleading, pundits such as Steven Rattner and Paul Krugman and many others have cited these statistics as serious evidence that ObamaCare is working.
That more people would be insured was never in dispute. If you mandate that people buy something, penalize them if they don’t and give it away to some, more people will end up with it. The proper response to this is: Duh.
The real question is how many of those covered by ObamaCare were previously uninsured, how increased coverage is translating into more or better health care, and at what cost this comes both to public finances and personal liberties—all compared with what other alternatives? That is the stuff for serious debate.
That’s why instead of a serious debate, ♡bamaCare!!! supporters give sob stories and accusations of cruelty.
Islamic State fighters are operating training bases near the U.S. southern border and are being aided by violent drug cartels to smuggle terrorists into states like Texas, a report published Tuesday by a watchdog group claims.
The Judicial Watch report, which cited an unnamed Mexican Army officer and a Mexican police inspector, raises new fears that the fight with ISIS is closer to the U.S. than previously thought.
The report identified the locations of the two bases, and said one is as close as 8 miles from Texas in a town west of Juarez. Mexican authorities found possible evidence — plans written in Arabic and Urdu — last week in the town of “Anapra,” the sources said. These sources told the watchdog that “coyotes” who work for drug cartels assist in smuggling terrorists between Fort Hancock, Texas, and other undisclosed locations.
We can get serious and build a fence, or we can get people blown up.
It’s really that simple.
Matt Lewis has an interesting piece at The Week, discussing the styles of presidential contenders, and whether those styles do or don’t match the shifting moods of the electorate. You might want to read the whole thing, but start at least with this:
Cruz and Obama do indeed have some things in common, including an ambition to seize the brass ring after 15 minutes in the Senate, a keen intellect, and an Ivy league pedigree. But Cruz’s Texas style and penchant for hurling red meat to the base make him awfully dissimilar to the professorial Obama.
A much better model might be Marco Rubio. As both Politico and Hot Air point out, Rubio could best be seen as the Republicans’ Obama. This comparison has zero to do with political philosophy. And no, it’s not because Rubio’s is also a first-term senator (he made a pretty compelling case to Kasie Hunt about why he has more experience than then-Sen. Obama did in 2008). It’s really about style and temperament. Obama and Rubio both seem calm, reasonable, intellectual, professorial. They seem like they’d be more comfortable in a big cosmopolitan city than clearing brush on a Texas ranch. They’re telegenic thinkers, not brash doers.
Now, do Republicans really need their own Obama in 2016? Maybe.
What if 2008 marked a somewhat permanent political shift in presidential elections — away from the rural, rustic machismo of the Bush era and toward a more sophisticated, cosmopolitan ideal for a leader? Could it be that Republicans can only win again by playing this game — by casting aside the tough Southern thing, the Bush “swagger” — and nominating a young-ish, cosmopolitan conservative?
If the country has changed this way, and the GOP needs its own Obama — a conservative who can appeal to minorities, urbanites, and millennials — they might well turn to a Marco Rubio, a Bobby Jindal, or possibly a Jeb Bush.
I’m going to have to disagree strongly with Lewis’ take on Bush’s appeal, which doesn’t seem to exist outside of the GOP money machine and temporarily in the minds of lower-information voters who recognize the name and not much else. Scott Walker might fit that mold better, even if he lacks the Ivy League credentials. But that’s just an aside, a small detail — it’s Lewis’ premise about “style and temperament” which needs further exploring.
At this point in the pre-primary cycle, I’m like my young boys let loose in the toy section at Walmart. There’s so much to choose from, so much to take off the shelves and check out — the GOP bench is an embarrassment of riches like the party hasn’t seen since… since maybe not in my lifetime.
The Navy is looking to install electromagnetic rail guns on all three of its absurdly expensive Zumwalt-class destroyers, making them that much more expensiver — and deadlier:
[Captain Mike] Ziv said Navy leaders believe the DDG 1000 is the right ship to house the rail gun but that additional study was necessary to examine the risks. A rigorous study on the issue should be finished by the end of this year, Ziv said.
“I think it’s an ideal platform. There is a little bit more work needed to understand the details,” he added.
The DDG 1000 is 65-percent larger than existing 9,500-ton Aegis cruisers and destroyers with a displacement of 15,482 tons,.
The DDG 1000′s integrated power system, which includes its electric propulsion, helps generate up to 58 megawatts of on-board electrical power, something seen as key to the future when it comes to the possibility of firing a rail gun.
It is also possible that the weapon could someday be configured to fire from DDG 51 Arleigh Burke-class destroyers.
“We’ve looked at ships as small as DDG 51s. It takes something of that size. This isn’t something you are going to put on an LCS,” Ziv added.
When I’m Secretary of the Navy, we won’t build any ships too small to be armed with electromagnetic rail guns. And we’re going to build a lot of ships.
Some NSFW language.
Actually, it’s a great big win — for the Arbitrary State. Jonathan Adler has the story:
In a series of posts at “Notice & Comment,” the blog of the Yale Journal on Regulation, Professor Andy Grewal documents two additional cases in which the IRS has rewritten the PPACA’s tax credit eligibility requirements so as to expand eligibility beyond what Congress authorized. Combined with other instances of the IRS and HHS disregarding the PPACA’s plain text, it appears the federal government has little regard for what the PPACA actually says.
In his first two posts, Professor Grewall explains how IRS regulations disregard the statutory text so as to extend tax credit eligibility to some low-income aliens not lawfully residing in the U.S. In this way, the IRS regulation “casts a wider net than the statute” by expanding the number of people eligible for tax credits. Yet the IRS never provided any rationale for this change. Indeed, if one had just read the IRS explanation for what its regulations accomplish — as opposed to the regulations themselves — one would not even be aware of what the IRS did.
The IRS, with no authorization from Congress, is using your tax dollars to subsidize insurance purchases to illegal aliens.
Lawbreakers giving your money to lawbreakers, in other words.
There ought to be firings (or jail sentences) for the former and deportations for the latter. Instead, promotions and bonuses for the former and Democrat voter registrations for the latter seems more likely.
Or as another arbitrary ruler once put it, “L’Etat c’est Moi.”
This is new to me, but back in 1973 British military historian Paddy Griffith put together a large-scale wargame of Hitler’s plan to invade Britain — Operation Sea Lion — in September of 1940. The game, reports Al Nofi, was “based on traditional kriegsspiel methodology… with several dozen players and umpires, all isolated from each other except by means of simulated signaling. Many of the players and umpires were veterans of the war from both sides.” The results might not surprise those of us who enjoy modern and serious-minded computer simulations like Norm Koger’s “The Operational Art of War.” Read:
Although the Germans had elements of 10 divisions ashore, perhaps 90,000 men, most units were still awaiting their second echelons. These could not be dispatched across the Channel due to the presence of the Royal Navy and deteriorating weather. Late in the day the senior German players held an acrimonious staff meeting, during which the Army demanded reinforcements, while the Navy pointed to the poor situation in the Channel, and the Air Force protested a shortage of resources, since it was still bombing London and other cities while also trying to cover the invasion. A decision by the senior German player (“Hitler”) resulted in orders for second wave forces at Calais to cross to Folkestone, leaving troops further west along the coast in Sussex to fight it out with diminishing supplies.
Overnight on the 23rd-24th, the Germans advanced on Canterbury and Dover in Kent, but they were less successful in Sussex. Meanwhile, the Calais-Folkestone convoy managed to get to sea before dawn, as the weather cleared. But about daylight a British destroyer flotilla found the convoy about ten miles out to sea, and cut it to pieces, despite escorting U-boats and motor torpedo boats. The Luftwaffe intervened, but the RAF threw in 19 fighter squadrons. While the British suffered serious damage to several cruisers and destroyers, nearly two-thirds of the German transport barges were sunk. Though some small ships managed to make it to Folkestone, the port was so seriously damaged they could only unload slowly.
This air-sea fight in the Channel was the decisive action of the campaign. German forces ashore in England were rapidly running out of men, equipment, and ammunition, and were unable to effect further advances; at best they might be able to hold out for a week or so on what was at hand. With perhaps three-quarters of the German transport barges lost, further reinforcement was unlikely. As British ground forces began pressing the invaders back into their bridgeheads, the Germans ordered an evacuation. By enormous effort, the Germans were able to pull out about 15,400 of the 90,000 troops who had landed in England.
I can’t count the number of times I’ve tried to succeed at Unternehmen Seelöwe in various board and computer games like Koger’s which use historically accurate models. But given the weather and the orders of battle on both sides, the Germans just can’t get enough men across the Channel, or keep supplied the ones they do get across. Getting the bulk of their troops back across the Channel in a “Reverse Dunkirk” is about the best the German player can hope for.
It’s comforting to know someone like Griffith and his crew of WWII vets couldn’t do any “better” — a comfort personally and historically.
When a Democrat focuses on the middle class, picture a magnifying glass focused on ants. #Hillary2016
— Stephen Green (@VodkaPundit) April 14, 2015
What the heck — let’s make it a twofer.
Think of it as the black, mirrored-glass, up-armored luxury touring van of the people.
— Stephen Green (@VodkaPundit) April 14, 2015
Turns out Ankara is a way cooler place to live than I’d ever thought:
Taxpayers hit the roof when Mayor Melih Gökçek pulled the sheet off his Transformer-like masterpiece, saying it is an enormous waste of their money – and rightly so, as he blew a pretty big budget on it.
The off-the-wall mayor is now being sued by the Turkish Union of Engineers and Architects’ Chambers, who have described the robot as a ‘monstrosity’.
I for one welcome our new robot statue overlords. I’d like to remind them that as a trusted internet personality, I can be helpful in rounding up others to toil in their underground sugar caves.
Kurt Schlichter has an idea or three on how to take the fight to the Progressives’ home turf:
The mainstream media, also known the Democrats’ Steno Pool, looks invincible, but it’s vulnerable too. It needs eyeballs to live, so look elsewhere for your news and information. Every time you watch NBC News, you validate and empower liars who hate you and everything you stand for. So don’t. There’s a growing segment of conservative traditional and alternative media, and even a few mainstream journalists who still try to be objective, like Jake Tapper at CNN. Patronize them. Starve the lib-loving media until it either dies or reforms. The MSM needs you a helluva a lot more than you need it.
The same goes for popular culture. Is your favorite TV cop show disrespecting you? Did last week’s CSI: Rancho Cucamonga episode make the guy responsible for the massacre the Olive Garden be the Tea Partier who went on a shooting spree because the restaurant served breadsticks to black people? You don’t need that crap. Watch something else.
Empower conservative culture by patronizing quality conservative-created entertainment – as thriller writer Brad Thor says, doing so is an act of conscience. It also hits the enemy where it hurts – the wallet.
I’ve been thinking about exactly this, more so since Ace published his piece a week or two ago encouraging people to simply quit watching television.
Due to the nature of my work, it’s just not possible for me to stop reading msnbc.com or HuffPo or any of the rest — they’re my bread & butter. And there are shows I’m simply not ready to give up. Besides, even though I don’t watch a whole lot of TV, I get the feeling that giving it up is hard.
(ASIDE: It isn’t always that difficult. I used to watch Bones with my bride, more out of habit than for enjoyment. But I quit in a huff last year, when a Rush-type radio host was murdered — just after discovering his true liberal self and about to come out in favor of gun control. The killer turned out to be a liberal, but the show made it clear that the real bad guys are those gun-toting NRA types.)
Here’s the thing though. Shows end, don’t they? Finding new shows, quality ones worth watching, that takes effort too, doesn’t it?
Mad Men is about to end, which is sad because this week’s episode was especially good. But unlike AMC, I don’t have a 8PM Sunday slot* which needs filling. Over at AMC, they’re busy trying to come up with the next Mad Men to air — but who says I have to find the next one to watch? AMC is working like mad (heh), however all I have to do is sit back, do nothing, and get an hour of my life back each week.
Game of Thrones? Same story. I’m so angry at HBO most of the time, that I’m happy enough being a year behind and getting the discs “free” from Netflix — that’s less money into HBO’s pocket, and less out of mine. And in two or three years, Game of Thrones will end, too. Who says I have to fill the Netflix queue back up with something else?
Writing this, I realize it’s been years since I watched a sitcom, and I can’t say I miss the format one bit. Police procedurals? Unless you count Castle and Sherlock (which are really adventure stories), then I haven’t seen one of those since I-don’t-know-when. Good dramas are harder to give up, but Justified is about to air its final episode, and not even The Walking Dead can stumble around forever. Banshee is still new, and it’s too much trashy fun to just up and quit — I’ll stay until the end.
But other than that — and a couple other exceptions so unexceptional I can’t think of them off the top of my head — weening myself of TV shouldn’t be that hard. All I (or you) have to do is wait for the inevitable cancellations, and replace that hour of your life with something that isn’t force-fed progressive gruel.
Hit them where it hurts, indeed.
*I don’t actually know what time Mad Men is on. I get stuff from Netflix or iTunes and watch at my convenience.
There is some not-so-bad news out of the Middle East today, courtesy of StrategyPage:
American intelligence analysts, based on surveillance photos, electronic intercepts (of Internet, radio and cell phone discussions), captured documents and prisoner (and deserter) interrogations, believe that ISIL is now definitely on the defensive in Iraq, despite recent major attacks in Anbar. Although foreign volunteers continue to get to ISIL held areas in Syria and Iraq most of them have few useful skills (combat and otherwise). Meanwhile ISIL is suffering heavy losses (from combat and desertion) among its experienced fighters and specialists. There are growing discipline and morale problems that the senior leadership have few good solutions for. Executing commanders who do not win and lecturing the others is a short term solution that makes things worse in the long term.
ISIL also has financial problems. Iraqi offensives this year have cost ISIL over 90 percent of the oil production facilities it controlled. This oil was transported via truck to Turkey where criminal gangs bought it at a large discount and sold it on the black market. This provided most of the regular cash income ISIL could depend on. Now ISIL has to increase its extortion (of cash from populations it controls) and looting (of whatever they can get their hands on).
It’s good that ISIS is taking a beating. It’s bad that ISIS was ever allowed to fester so long. It may prove worse that Iran has been allowed to use the resulting chaos to make even bigger inroads into Iraq.