What is the reaction inside DOJ to the Senate’s defeat of the Debo Adegbile nomination to head the Civil Rights Division at the Department of Justice? According to an email sent by Acting Assistant Attorney General Jocelyn Samuels, the “sacred mission” will continue.
Samuels, in an email late this afternoon to Division staff obtained by PJ Media, said:
I anticipate that last week’s developments will prompt a period of reflection and discussion about civil rights in this country and how we can best achieve our sacred mission. This is healthy, and I am confident that our work will emerge the stronger for it. Division staff have always demonstrated both resilience and an enduring commitment to the principles of equality of opportunity that animate everything we do.
“Sacred mission”? “Equality of opportunity”?
First, Webster has a number of theological definitions of sacred:
1 a : dedicated or set apart for the service or worship of a deity <a tree sacred to the gods>
b: devoted exclusively to one service or use (as of a person or purpose) <a fund sacred to charity>2
a : worthy of religious veneration : holy
b : entitled to reverence and respect
3: of or relating to religion : not secular or profane <sacred music>
This illustrates that to some in the civil rights field, civil rights is their religion. Thus, it becomes sacred.
Regarding the Debo Adegbile nomination, one of the reasons Adegbile lost is because he did not believe in equality of opportunity. He believed in giving out benefits based on race. That’s why he fought to keep Abigail Fisher out of law school simply because she was white. Fisher was not the only victim of the NAACP’s modern-day segregationist agenda, and senators knew it.
Fifty years ago, the NAACP LDF had the moral high ground and fought inequality. In 2014, the NAACP is one of the leading champions of inequality.
So let’s have that discussion about race that Samuels and Senator Harry Reid have been agitating for. Bring it on.
After regular Americans in Peoria learn that the Civil Rights Division supports race preferences and hasn’t done a thing to combat numerous instances of racially motivated violence, I suspect it will be a discussion Samuels and Reid hope ends quickly. Once regular Americans learn about the millions of dollars used by the DOJ to block voter ID and to allocate benefits on the basis of skin color, it will be a discussion Samuels, Reid, and Obama wish had never started.
It will be a discussion that will have ramifications in races for the U.S. Senate in places like North Carolina, Louisiana, Arkansas and West Virginia.
Right now leftist racialists are in the tiny minority in America. Once we start that racial discussion Reid is agitating for, you can bet the majority won’t be happy to learn what the sacred mission at the DOJ Civil Rights Division is all about.
I’m scheduled to appear on Vicki McKenna’s WISN-AM 1130 AM radio show in Milwaukee today at 12:15 a.m. ET to discuss the very very bad amendments to the Voting Rights Act sponsored by Rep. Jim Sensenbrenner (R-Wisc.). The amendments would return to Eric Holder massive federal power over state elections. It would give Holder back the power to block state election integrity laws like Voter ID and citizenship verification that the Supreme Court stripped away last June.
Sensenbrenner is working with far left groups like the NAACP and ACLU to return this power to Holder’s Justice Department. His bill also specifically strips white voters from the protections of some parts of the Voting Rights Act – a long held dream of the militant race left.
Last week Sensenbrenner was the victim of undercover videographer James O’Keefe. In O’Keefe’s video, Sensenbrenner displays an unfortunate lack of knowledge about what is in his own bill. For example, he incorrectly tells a camo-wearing O’Keefe that the bill stops Eric Holder’s attacks on Voter ID. “I got a provision in there that basically gets Eric Holder out of going after photo ID laws.”
Sensenbrenner is wrong. His bill actually gives Holder more tools to attack election integrity laws like Voter ID.
Sensenbrenner was invited to appear on McKenna’s show at the same time I am on. He refused. He will appear on a separate time and day. Let’s hope he has a better understanding of his own law than he did on the Project Veritas video shot by James O’Keefe. (Link to WISN streaming).
PJ Media was the first news outlet to report on Debo Adegbile’s ties to Mumia Abu Jamal. His nomination to head the Civil Rights Division at the Justice Department was just defeated 52-47. Democrats Chris Coons, Bob Casey, Joe Manchin, Mark Pryor, Heitkamp, Donnelly and John Walsh joined the GOP in blocking the nomination.
The U.S. Senate has delayed the vote on Debo Adegbile for Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights until Tuesday because of the impending winter storm in D.C. A storm of a different sort hit the nomination last Friday. Pennsylvania’s Democrat Senator Bob Casey announced his opposition to Adegbile because Adegbile worked for Mumia Abu Jamal, the killer of police officer Danny Faulkner.
PJ Media was the first news outlet to report on Adegbile’s work for the cop killer.
The Fraternal Order of Police and other law enforcement groups have vigorously opposed Adegbile’s nomination. The question is will other Democrats follow Casey’s lead?
Senators from North Carolina, Louisiana, West Virginia, Arkansas, Montana and Alaska face difficult election prospects. Whether they want to vote for a man who opposed religious liberty, fought to keep white applicants out of law school, and routinely fights for racial criteria in hiring remains to be seen. Opponents have two more days to phone their Senators.
Danny Faulkner’s widow is also supporting a petition to oppose Adegbile.
I had missed the Sochi closing ceremonies last week, so I watched them on tape. Well, not quite tape, but that’s what people my age and older call it. We’ll return to that in a moment.
In the ceremonies, the Russian Olympic Committee representative called the games the greatest ever and said the world got to see “the new face of Russia.”
This week we learned the new face of Russia looks quite a bit like the old face of Russia — paranoid, belligerent and skillful in exploiting moments of American weakness.
Back to the tape.
There’s a whole generation now that doesn’t watch things on tape, and never did.
The millennials are ill-equipped to understand the character of this new U.S.-Russian confrontation. They don’t know much about the Cold War, except perhaps that Mikhail Gorbachev brought it to an end. They don’t know a thing about Ronald Reagan’s uncompromising crusade against the evil of Soviet totalitarianism, and if they do, they might find his moral clarity discomforting.
They don’t know much about a bishop from Krakow becoming the bishop of Rome and turning the Eastern Bloc inside out with a message of freedom of conscience and human dignity.
They don’t know much about Maggie Thatcher’s moral certainty in troubled times, despite suffering the domestic-propaganda onslaught from fellow-traveler forces inside the UK seeking a country more like the Soviet Union than “Maggie’s England,” as Roger Waters’ dystopian description proclaimed.
Pink Floyd raises the question: Will the millennials even recognize how the culture, how music, how even ABC played such a destructive role in the Cold War? America was fed a constant diet from Soviet apologists. Nena’s “war machine sprang to life” just as Pershing IIs were being deployed to West Germany. ABC scared the living hell out of children with the apocalyptic docudrama The Day After (aired in Sunday prime time no less), implying the course set by Ronald Reagan would end up with mushroom clouds sprouting up all over the nation.
And now, everyone who understood how to confront the threat of the Soviet Union can say, “I told you so, and we knew how to handle them.” Reagan, Ed Meese, John Paul II, Caspar Weinberger, Strom Thurmond, and thousands of others who shared their moral clarity. Don’t forget, Ted Kennedy was feeding information to Soviet leaders about how to confront Ronald Reagan. Some were on the wrong side of history, some were on the right.
During this era, Obama was on the wrong side.
Remember back in 2013 when some in the GOP were wishing Sen. Ted Cruz would shut up about Obamacare on the floor of the Senate? The debt ceiling, they told us, was where the real battle would take place. So they wanted Cruz to clam up, because after all, there was a GOP plan to go to war over the debt ceiling next time the Democrats wanted to raise the national debt.
Stroll though this National Review piece from last year (“The New Cantor Plan”) and reminisce. At the time, lots of conservatives fell for it. Yes, the debt ceiling, that’s where the real fight will be, they thought. Keep the quotes in mind next time the Republican party is urged to avoid a fight with the argument the fight can be put off to a more “favorable” environment in the far off future.
“We go right to the debt-ceiling fight, and that’s where the real battle is, we feel,” said Representative John Fleming. “It’s kind of like the follow-up plan, assuming that [the CR] fails. . . . The real fight will be on the debt ceiling.”
House budget chairman Paul Ryan also urged colleagues to wage the more serious fight over the debt ceiling. “We have to stay on the right side of public opinion,” he told his colleagues. “Shutting down the government puts us on the wrong side. The fight is on the debt limit.”
In exchange for a debt-ceiling increase, Cantor told colleagues, the GOP will issue a litany of demands, including a one-year delay of Obamacare, construction of the Keystone pipeline, an anti-regulatory bill called the REINS Act, and other spending reforms. The exact combination will be negotiated with President Obama and Reid.
Justice Department lawyer Bradley Heard was in court today trying to stop Kansas from ensuring that only citizens register to vote. Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach, relying on a United States Supreme Court opinion of last year, asked the federal Election Assistance Commission to permit him to ensure that only citizens were registering to vote.
The Election Assistance Commission said no, so Kris Kobach went to federal court. Enter Eric Holder’s Justice Department, as usual, opposing election integrity measures.
Despite harping about resource concerns (which apparently means that the DOJ can do nothing about corrupted voter rolls), Holder found the time and money to send Bradley Heard to a hearing in Kansas to argue against Kobach’s election integrity measures.
Things didn’t go well for Bradley Heard before Judge Eric Melgren today. The Wichita Eagle:
Judge Eric Melgren repeatedly pressed Department of Justice lawyer Bradley Heard to explain how a Supreme Court decision last year on Arizona’s proof-of-citizenship law allows the federal Election Assistance Commission to reject requests from Arizona and Kansas to add state-law requirements to the instructions for filling out the voting form.
“The single pivotal question in this case is who gets to decide … what’s necessary” to establish citizenship for voting, Melgren said.
Heard said that decision lies with the EAC under the federal National Voter Registration Act, also known as the motor-voter law. He said the law empowers the commission to decide what questions and proofs are necessary to include in the federal registration form.
Take note, Heard argued both that Kobach can’t take steps to prevent foreigners to register to vote, and, that federal government power over state elections is supreme.
So who is Bradley Heard?
Hans von Spakovsky wrote about Heard’s background in the PJ Media Every Single One Series installment on the DOJ Voting Section:
Before joining the Voting Section, Mr. Heard worked for a number of years at the Advancement Project, a radical left-wing voting organization. The Advancement Project has worked closely with the ACLU, NAACP LDF, Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights, and other liberal advocates to oppose voter ID statutes, felon disenfranchisement laws, and citizenship verification regulations, and to take myriad other militant positions on state and federal voting rights laws. Mr. Heard fit right in at the Advancement Project, having previously founded the Georgia Voter Empowerment Project, which describes its mission as increasing the “civic participation levels of progressive-minded Georgians.”
Amusingly, before moving to Washington, Mr. Heard had a nasty breakup with his plaintiff’s civil rights firm in Atlanta. He commenced litigation against his partners, who in turn claimed he was engaging in misconduct. Heard then sought criminal arrest warrants against his former partners, charging that they had engaged in false voter registration and voting by an unqualified elector, both felonies. The court declined to issue the warrants.
When Bradley Heard isn’t suing his law partners or trying to make it easier for non-citizens to register to vote, he runs this “activist” blog called Prince George’s Urbanist. There, Heard rails about various left wing causes like changing the name of the Redskins and urging family unfriendly government mandates on development. His Twitter feed (@BradleyHeard) calls himself a “Voting Rights Gladiator. . . Outside Agitator.”
Governor Bob McDonnell was indicted yesterday for giving favors to a man who loaned him a Ferrari, Rolexes, cash, and jets. Anyone tempted to give the disgraced governor the benefit of the doubt should read this wrecking ball piece on the indictment from the eminent Bryon York. McDonnell appeared on MSNBC today and defended himself in a press conference. These unconventional appearances after an indictment have the trappings of a defendant who will have to draw an inside straight to avoid federal prison. But to beat the wrap, he’ll need cash, lots of it.
Enter the Bob McDonnell “Restoration Fund.” This email went out to this morning to donors to his campaign:
Earlier today former Governor Bob McDonnell released a statement regarding the false indictment built upon discredited witnesses that was filed today in federal court.
Please take time to read below
The Restoration Fund
A MESSAGE FROM FORMER GOVERNOR ROBERT F. MCDONNELL
“My fellow Virginians, earlier today federal prosecutors notified my attorneys that they have filed criminal charges against me and my wife Maureen, alleging that we violated federal law by accepting gifts and loans from Jonnie Williams, the former CEO of Star Scientific. I deeply regret accepting legal gifts and loans from Mr. Williams, all of which have been repaid with interest, and I have apologized for my poor judgment for which I take full responsibility. However, I repeat emphatically that I did nothing illegal for Mr. Williams in exchange for what I believed was his personal generosity and friendship. I never promised – and Mr. Williams and his company never received – any government benefit of any kind from me or my Administration. We did not violate the law, and I will use every available resource and advocate I have for as long as it takes to fight these false allegations, and to prevail against this unjust overreach of the federal government.”
Robert F. McDonnell
Former Governor of Virginia
This looks like a soon-to-be pitch for cash from a legal defense fund. The irony is rich. A government official who finds himself facing federal prison because of cash handouts may be asking for more cash handouts. When will it end?
It won’t end before we are all treated to a photograph of Bob McDonnell driving a Ferrari delivered to him for vacation use from the sugar daddy. The indictment describes Maureen McDonnell emailing the photograph to the sugar daddy, presumably as a thank you for the favor.
It is worth noting that the whole McDonnell mess started to unravel when they treated a chef poorly. The governor and his spokesmen were quick to throw the chef to the wolves and smear the chef’s reputation. They reminded reporters that the chef was facing charges for fleecing the governor’s mansion of some food. How delicious in hindsight — a few hams vs. a Ferrari.
Former Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell has been indicted by a federal grand jury for corruption. So has his wife. McDonnell allegedly took gifts in exchange for favors and special treatment by the Commonwealth of Virginia. He also allegedly used taxpayer dollars for personal purposes. PJ Media has covered McDonnell’s rush to allow felons to vote. Perhaps now it makes sense. The Washington Post:
In exchange, authorities alleged that the McDonnells worked in concert to lend the prestige of the governorship to Williams’s struggling company, a small former cigarette manufacturer that now sells dietary supplements.
The two were charged with 14 felony counts, including wire fraud, conspiracy to commit wire fraud, obtaining property under color of their official office and conspiring to the do the same.
They were also charged with making false statements to a federal credit union.
McDonnell was also charged with making a false statement to a financial institution, and Maureen McDonnell was charged with obstructing the investigation.
Motive? From paragraph 16 of the indictment:
Then, the First Lady called the donor to see if the Ferrari was available for Bob McDonnell to use:
Wisconsin Republican Jim Sensenbrenner has teamed up with the ACLU and introduced a bill which would radically expand federal power over state elections. It would give Attorney General Eric Holder expansive new federal powers over state elections, including the ability to barge into polling places to monitor the use of foreign language election materials. It would also give Holder the power to block election integrity measures like Voter ID and citizenship verification.
More details to follow. But Roger Clegg has this piece at National Review.
And, indeed, for better or worse the Justice Department and civil-rights groups are now using those other provisions to try to advance their agendas, which amount to a war on voter-ID requirements and ensuring the continued racial gerrymandering and segregation of voting districts. There’s no evidence that the Left needs more weapons in its arsenal; all that’s different in the post–Shelby County world is that now its lawyers have to prove racial discrimination before they can get court relief, which is the way that every other civil-rights law works.
The second point: Much in the draft bill has nothing to do with Shelby County at all. Rather, the Court’s decision is being used as an excuse to enact the Left’s wish-list in voting policy. In particular, the Left wants to promote its plaintiffs’ lawyers to the status of the attorney general in making civil-rights enforcement decisions. All this is a standard demand for the civil-rights groups whenever they (deservedly) lose a case and run to Congress.
The tragic part for Mr. Sensenbrenner, that in the twilight of his career, has gone all-in with the arch enemies of the Constitution. He had vowed to “fix” Section 4 of the Voting Rights Act which the Supreme Court struck down last June. Instead, he has tinkered with a dozen other issues, making it Christmas time for the far left and satisfying their long wish list to expand federal power over elections. Promising to “fix” Section 4 was an honorable choice. But his bill does far more.
Sensenbrenner’s new friends aren’t satisfied. The far left Leadership Conference on Civil Rights issued a statement saying the bill is just a first step. “But this bill is only the first step in the legislative process. As introduced, this bill does not go far enough in protecting language minorities or voters living in states with restrictive voter ID laws.” Comforting.
What is good for the goose isn’t good for the gander. Helena Andrews at the Washington Post has this reckless column about Andrew Breitbart and Shirley Sherrod.
In it, Andrews falsely states that Breitbart “published a doctored video” of Sherrod’s racist confession at an NAACP convention. In fact, Breitbart published all that had been given to him, including the portion of the video where Sherrod is redeemed by confessing that she should not have been making decisions on the basis of race. Breitbart also published the portion where Sherrod admits making adverse decisions toward a white farmer because of his race.
No matter to Andrews. Instead she presents a narrative as if Breitbart cut and pasted and deleted words such as “not” from a video. Claiming the video is “doctored” is patently false. But Breitbart isn’t around to sue Andrews and the Washington Post. The defamation lawsuits only go one way, with Sherrod as a plaintiff trying to enrich herself at the expense of Andrew Breitbart’s widow and children.
Eric Holder’s Justice Department is seeking to hire a Kinyarwanda cultural advisor at a salary up to $115,742 per year. From and email quoting the USA Jobs Posting:
Department of Justice (DOJ) is looking for a Cultural and Linguistic Advisor. This position is located in the Human Rights and Special Prosecutions (HRSP) Section of the Criminal Division.
We discussed the position with a DOJ HR officer but the position was just posted on USA this week so we’ll summarize the position and provide you a direct link.
What you will do:
• Support case development and conduct research in multiple languages.
• Identify potential perpetrators of human rights violations present in the United States, and identify potential victims and witnesses.
• Draft memoranda that identify leads and other relevant information, review foreign language documents, and summarize relevant events.
• Review and catalogue reports on human rights violations and mass atrocities abroad.
• Generate in-house reports on human rights-related accomplishments of HRSP.
• Process internship applications and assign/oversee work of undergraduate interns.
• Conduct outreach events, especially to African diaspora groups and providers of services to refugees and torture survivors in the Washington, D.C. area.
The background/qualifications they are looking for:
• To be found fully qualified for this position, applicants must state, in the body of their resume that they are fluent in the Kinyarwanda language, in both spoken and written form. Applicants not addressing this Selective Placement Factor will be determined not to be qualified for the position and will not receive further consideration.
• Education: you need to have a behavioral or social science degree; or related disciplines appropriate to the position.
• Combination of education and experience that provided the applicant with knowledge of one or more of the behavioral or social sciences equivalent to a major in the field.
• Four years of appropriate experience that demonstrated that the applicant has acquired knowledge of one or more of the behavioral or social sciences equivalent to a major in the field.
AND (in addition to the above)
Specialized Experience: Applicants must possess one year of specialized experience at, or equivalent to, the GS-12 Federal grade level. Examples of specialized experience inlcude:
• Translating records written in Kinyarwanda into English.
• Interpreting from Kinyarwanda into English in real time, in interviews between Kinyarwanda speakers and U.S. government employees lacking fluency in Kinyarwanda.
• Monitoring interpretation quality of paid contract interpreters in U.S. or other courtrooms in which Kinyarwanda is interpreted into English during criminal trials or immigration proceedings.
• Reviewing documents written in Kinyarwanda to summarize content and to compare descriptions of significant human rights violations with other descriptions of these events
Those who call themselves reporters are supposed to report facts, not present half truths. MSNBC apparently has different standards for the people they call reporters.
Take Zachary Roth. Yesterday, PJ Media reported on the settlement between the state of Ohio and True the Vote and Judicial Watch in case seeking to have clean voting rolls in Ohio. At MSNBC, Roth objected to the agreement doing what federal law allows: mailing notices to inactive voters to attempt to discover whether they still live where they once did and if they want to reactivate their registration. It isn’t surprising that Roth would object to list maintenance best practices.
Nor is it surprising that Roth would give readers a false impression about the interstate cross check program included in the settlement. Interstate cross check is a pact between a number of states to compare voter rolls to see if people are registered in multiple states. Roth paints this practice as a nefarious partisan program managed by Republicans. Roth writes:
In the deal announced Monday, Ohio agreed to participate in the Interstate Voter Registration Cross-Check program, known as Cross-Check, run by Kansas’ Republican Secretary of State Kris Kobach, which aims to identify voters registered in more than one state. Ohio had been sued in federal court by two conservative groups—True the Vote, the Tea Party-linked group that stokes concern over voter fraud, and Judicial Watch—seeking to force the state to clean up its voter rolls. . . .
But voting-rights advocates say Cross-Check makes it too easy to wrongly remove voters from the rolls. Speaking to msnbc last month, Keesha Gaskins, at the time a senior counsel at the Brennan Center, called Kobach’s program “more of a purge mechanism.”
Unfortunately for Roth, the cross state program was as plan hatched by Republicans and Democrats. An election official emails PJ Media:
The Kansas project was started by a bipartisan group of 4 secretaries of state in that region, including a Republican and Democrat Secretary of State. The Democrat SOS was Robin Callahan, very much a liberal. The Republican SOS in Kansas was Ron Thornburg. When Kobach walked in, it already existed.
Roth leaves out these inconvenient bipartisan facts because it would impair his effort to stoke paranoia among MSNBC viewers.
Notice also the extremism of the Brennan Center’s Keesha Gaskins. The Brennan Center is notorious for objecting to every single smart election integrity proposal. Whether Voter ID or citizenship verification, the Brennan Center can be counted on to keep vulnerabilities in our electoral system wide open. They don’t support a single measure to improve the integrity of American elections. And when you have “reporters” in the media willing to play along, why change?
PJ Media has obtained an email sent by Sherrilyn Ifill just before she was scheduled to appear on The Kelly File last week to discuss the nomination of Debo Adegbile, the lawyer who helped defend the cop killer Mumia Abu Jamal. Ifill is the head of the NAACP Legal Defense Fund, the organization once headed by Adegbile.
In the email, Ifill begs for prayers before she “put[s] the full armor on” to go on Fox News. Notice she asks for “fervent prayers,” and finds a link between her appearance the same day at a commemoration for To Kill a Mockingbird and talking about the Mumia Abu Jamal matter. “I have to believe the 2 are somehow related.”
In To Kill a Mocking Bird, Atticus Finch defends an innocent man, Tom Robinson, from charges of rape. Mumia Abu Jamal was found guilty of killing Philadelphia police officer Danny Faulkner. Numerous appeals courts have affirmed the verdict.
Ifill ended up not appearing on the Kelly File to defend the NAACP’s role in the Mumia matter.
>>> Sherrilyn Ifill 1/10/2014 12:45 PM >>>
It appears that I will be on FOX tonight (Megyn Kelly’s show) talking about the mounting right-wing campaign against the confirmation of a former LDF lawyer Debo Adegbile, who’s been nominated to serve as Asst. Atty General for Civil Rights.
The criticism is based on our representation of Mr. Mumia Abu-Jamal (while Mr. Adegbile was our litigation director). Mr. Abu-Jamal was convicted and sentenced to death of killing a police officer in Philadelphia in 1981. We did not represent Mr. Mumia at trial, but represented him 25 years later in a challenge to the process by which he was sentenced to death.
Attached is the statement we released today that explains LDF’s involvement in this case and our commitment to ensuring that race plays no role in the criminal justice system. The statement really explains our position and I encourage you to read it and circulate it.
I really do need your prayers tonight. I am going up into the camp and I need to put on the full armor! I plan to come out with more than I go in with, but I need you to surround me with your fervent prayers. The show will be at 9pm tonight.
Prior to the show I will be speaking at the NY Historical Society tonight introducing a showing of To Kill a Mockingbird. I have to believe the 2 are somehow related.
President & Director-Counsel
NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc.
40 Rector Street, 5th Fl.
New York, NY 10006
Hans von Spakovsky has the inside scoop of the new omnibus spending bill. Most notably, the new bill funds the government jobs of dozens Department of Justice employees who no longer have any work to do after the Supreme Court struck down Section 4 of the Voting Rights Act. Von Spakovsky writes:
Of course, the other thing needed with the Civil Rights Division is a cutback in its budget, which has grown considerably, and gives Eric Holder the resources to file numerous suits challenging common sense voter ID, immigration, and other state laws he does not like. There are also at least two dozen lawyers and support staff in the Voting Section of the Civil Rights Division who have seemingly had nothing to do since the U.S. Supreme Court declared the coverage formula for Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act unconstitutional in June 2013. These DOJ personnel who worked on Section 5 matters are now on a permanent, extended coffee break – yet not a single one of them has been laid off. This is an enormous waste of taxpayer funds that should have been eliminated by Congress.
Permanent extended coffee break? Indeed.
Inside the Justice Department Civil Rights Division Voting Section, almost three dozen federal jobs were rendered irrelevant after the Supreme Court’s decision in Shelby v. Holder. Sources report that after the decision, the employees have done next to nothing, or taken “extended coffee breaks” as von Spakovsky reports. Here are the federal employees von Spakovsky is referring to, and salaries from public records searches provided to PJ Media.
Berman, Robert; Deputy Chief, Section 5, $155,500
Bashir-Boulghassoul, Lema; Trial Attorney, Section 5, $136,134
Falwell, Marie; Equal Opportunity Assistant, Section 5, $56,791
Greene, Judybeth; Trial Attorney, Section 5, $155,500
Grigsby, Kevin; Civil Rights Analyst, Section 5, $64,548
Gyamfi, Stephanie, Lead Civil Rights Analyst, Section 5, $97,936
Hamilton-Hill, Sandra, Civil Rights Analyst, Section 5, $81,204
Harrison, Martin; Legal Technician (File Librarian), Section 5, $54,534
Hyatt, Joi; Civil Rights Analyst, Section 5, $70,794
Johnson, Phyllis; Case Management Specialist, Section 5, $65,343
Jones, Nadine; Legal Technician (Classifier), Section 5, $68,230
Kim, Elizabeth, Civil Rights Analyst, Section 5, $64,548
King, Ryan, Civil Rights Analyst, Section 5, $62,467
Le, Tran-Chau, Civil Rights Analyst, Section 5, $70,794
Lowell, Robert; Attorney Reviewer, Section 5, $155,500
Murray, Joseph, Lead Civil Rights Attorney (Trainer), Section 5, $97,936
Payne, Autumn; Lead Civil Rights Attorney, Section 5, $94,969
Powers, John; Civil Rights Analyst, Section 5, $79,864
Reed, Judith; Trial Attorney, Section 5, $155,500
Rich, James Eric; Trial Attorney, Section 5, $152,635
Riggins, Jesmond; Civil Rights Analyst, Section 5, $62,467
Riordan, Maureen; Trial Attorney, Section 5, $155,500
Robinson, Pamela; Secretary, Section 5, $52,061
Schaffer, Tracy; Lead Civil Rights Analyst, Section 5, $94,969
Soo-Tim, Tiffani; Secretary, Section 5, $ 43,616
Stafford, Suzanne; Civil Rights Analyst, Section 5, (mostly works on FOIA), $92,341
Stephens, Jennifer; Civil Rights Analyst, Section 5, $62,467
Thorpe, Nicole; Supervisory Civil Rights Analyst, Section 5, $119,238
Travett, Rosita; Legal Technician, Section 5, $60,765
Wake, Brittany; Civil Rights Analyst, Section 5, $62,467
Update: an amendment to the Omnibus spending bill has been introduced to eliminate these positions. A floor speech on the House Floor is expected around 7:30 p.m.
True the Vote and Judicial Watch have reached a “historic” settlement with Ohio to ensure clean voter rolls in that state. The settlement is historic because it marks the first case brought by a private party under Section 8 of Motor Voter against a state to require the clean up of corrupted state voter rolls. Last fall, the American Civil Rights Union reached settlements with two Mississippi counties under the same voter roll clean up law.
As PJ Media has reported for years, private parties have been forced to bring these cases because Eric Holder’s Justice Department has lawlessly shut down enforcement of Section 8 of Motor Voter, allowing millions of dead and ineligible voters to clog the rolls.
The Judicial Watch press release:
Judicial Watch, True the Vote Reach Historic Settlement with State of Ohio in Lawsuit over Clean Voter Rolls
(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch and True the Vote announced today that they have reached a settlement in an August 30, 2012, lawsuit against election officials in the State of Ohio, resulting in an agreement by Ohio Secretary of State Jon Husted to take a series of actions to further ensure that the state is in compliance with the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA). The Judicial Watch/True the Vote lawsuit charged Ohio election officials with failing to take reasonable steps to maintain clean voter registration lists as required by Section 8 of the NVRA.
Under the terms of the settlement, which extend through November 2018, the State of Ohio specifically agreed to take the following nine actions relating to voter roll list maintenance and NVRA compliance:
a. To participate in the State and Territorial Exchange of Vital Events (STEVE) to obtain out-of-state death information.
b. To participate in the Interstate Voter Registration Cross-Check program administered by the Kansas Secretary of State to identify registered voters who have moved out-of-state.
c. To use Ohio Bureau of Motor Vehicles data to identify registered voters who move within Ohio, with frequent updates being sent to local officials.
d. To use an online voter registration change of address website to encourage voters to keep their registration information current.
e. To conduct a special, monthly, duplicate registration elimination program, within defined technical thresholds, for all Ohio County boards of election voter lists.
f. To keep online, and available for public access, a current voter registration list.
g. To require the county boards of election to send accurate survey information to the Secretary of State’s Office, to be compiled and forwarded to the Election Assistance commission for its NVRA-related surveys.
h. To use reasonable efforts to promote the expanded use by recent college graduates of Ohio’s online voter registration change of address system, including education to remind college graduates to keep their voter registration addresses and information current and to request necessary updates; and to endeavor to coordinate these activities in conjunction with Ohio’s colleges and universities.
i. To direct boards of election to send confirmation notices annually to voters who may be inactive; and to query boards of election on a regular basis as to whether this direction is being followed.
The legal action against the State of Ohio began in February 2012 when Judicial Watch sent a letter to Husted notifying him that the state was in violation of Section 8 of the NVRA. Judicial Watch subsequently filed its lawsuit in partnership with True the Vote on August 12.
“This settlement marks a milestone in the fight to make certain that voter rolls are being properly maintained across the state; helping to assure the public that the most basic principles of federal election law are being upheld; and helping to restore Ohioans’ faith in the integrity of our voting system,” said True the Vote President Catherine Engelbrecht.
“Election officials in the State of Ohio are to be commended for shouldering their responsibility to maintain clean voter registration lists. This is a historic settlement, the first of its kind in the history of the National Voter Registration Act. Dirty election rolls can lead to voter and election fraud. Under the terms of this groundbreaking settlement, the people of Ohio can now rest easier that their elections will be cleaner, beginning with the 2014 elections. The problem of dirty rolls is a nationwide problem, and Ohio’s good faith steps to address it can serve as a model for other states,” stated Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton.
As part of its Election Integrity Project, Judicial Watch found that voter rolls in a number of states contained a great number of registrations for individuals who were ineligible to vote. Judicial Watch notified a dozen states that they must clean up their voter registration lists or face lawsuits. Judicial Watch and True the Vote subsequently filed lawsuits against election officials in Indiana and Ohio, and prompted the state of Florida and other states, without litigation, to remove thousands of ineligible voters from state registration lists. According to independent research published by Pew Charitable Trusts in February 2012, approximately 24 million active voter registrations throughout the United States – or one out of every eight registrations – are either no longer valid or are significantly inaccurate.
Judicial Watch is partnering with True the Vote and the Election Law Center’s J. Christian Adams, who previously served in the voting rights section of the Department of Justice, on a nationwide campaign to ensure the integrity of elections. The groups are represented in Ohio by the law firm Langdon Law LLC.
As the release notes, I also served as counsel on the case. True the Vote’s statement can be read here (with links to a PDF of the settlement agreement).
Katie Pavlich over at Town Hall scores this video find. It shows NAACP Legal Defense Fund lawyer Christina Swarms addressing a venomous rally for cop killer Mumia Abu Jamal in Philadelphia. In the video, she says how proud the NAACP is to represent Mumia Abu Jamal.
Black Panther Mumia Abu Jamal killed police officer Danny Faulkner before becoming a celebrity among leftists. I appeared on The Kelly File last night along with Danny Faulker’s widow to talk about Debo Adegbile’s advocacy on behalf of the murderer.
President Obama nominated Adegbile to head up the Justice Department Civil Rights Division. His nomination is currently before the Senate Judiciary Committee.
In the video, the NAACP lawyers make it clear the NAACP is in the game because of race. That is important because yesterday before the United States Senate, Debo Adegbile testified under oath that the NAACP’s decision to represent the convicted cop killer had nothing to do with race. Katie Pavlich’s money quote:
“It is absolutely my honor to represent Mumia Abu-Jamal. It is my pleasure, it is my honor to have that opportunity and there is no question in my mind, there is no question in the mind of anyone at the Legal Defense Fund that the justice system has completely and utterly failed Mumia Abu-Jamal and in our view, that has everything to do with race and that is why the legal defense fund is in this case,” attorney Christina Swarms said during the event. “We are acutely aware that the injustices of the criminal justice system are inextricably bound up in race.”
Yesterday during testimony on Capitol Hill, Adegbile denied the NAACP Legal Defense Fund involvement in the Abu-Jamal case had anything to do with race, but instead argued his organization got involved on a strictly legal basis.
Swarms basks in the pro-Mumia applause from the radical activists. ”This is something I have to take in,” she swoons.
“We stand on the shoulder of giants, and the giants in this case are in this room.” She thanks the pro-Mumia activists: “I want to extend my thanks from my legal team and the [NAACP] Legal Defense Fund.”
Fifty years ago, the NAACP was about treating every human being with individual dignity and breaking down racial segregation. Today, the NAACP is proud to represent cop killers.
The United States Department of Labor has made a $5,000,000 grant of U.S. taxpayer dollars to Morocco.
From the Department of Labor press release:
The project aims to reduce child labor in the Marrakesh-Tensift-Al-Haouz region of Morocco by promoting children’s participation in educational programs and delivering vocational training focused on sectors, such as farming and ecotourism. Additionally, it will offer support to youth of legal working age to secure quality employment opportunities.
The press release further states U.S. taxpayer dollars will be used in Morocco ”to promote access to social services for families and help them improve their livelihoods by providing access to microlending and savings programs and other activities to increase household resilience.”
Her name is Pam Karlan. She has described herself as a “snarky, bisexual, Jewish woman.” She is a radical progressive. She is currently a law professor at Stanford, and a dishonest one at that. She will be joining Eric Holder’s Justice Department to oversee the enforcement of federal election laws during the 2014 midterm elections.
PJ Media readers already know Pam Karlan as the professor who published dishonest scholarship about the Bush Justice Department’s voting rights enforcement. From PJ Media’s “The Dangerous Dishonesty of Possible Supreme Court Nominee Pam Karlan“:
Karlan’s dishonesty goes beyond womyn’s issues, and extends to the election system. She falsely attacked the Bush administration’s Justice Department for not protecting racial minorities. This is a favorite and well-worn tactic; it’s what old segregationists like Coley Blease and Woodrow Wilson used to do — stoke racial division by lying about opponents. Unfortunately, Karlan’s lies were published with an air of respectability in the Duke Journal of Law and Public Policy (4 Duke J. Const. L. & Pub. Pol’y 17, 2009). She writes:
“For five of the eight years of the Bush Administration, [they] brought no Voting Rights Act cases of its own except for one case protecting white voters.”
This is demonstrably false; any visit to the DOJ website demonstrates this. Karlan says the Voting Section brought no cases to protect minorities under the Voting Rights Act in five of eight years — let’s look at the record.
My article then traces out in detail the lies that Karlan published in a Duke Law scholarly publication.
I contacted the editors of the Duke Journal of Constitutional Law in September 2013 to see if Karlan ever submitted a correction for her false scholarship. She hadn’t.
The faculty advisor apologized and told me: “We are always concerned when an article published in our journal contains misstatements. . . the Constitutional Law and Public Policy Journal – not to mention Duke itself – does not endorse a disputed factual claim like Professor Karlan’s in the way that the [Washington] Times would endorse the claims in an investigative piece published in its newspaper.”
Ed Whelan over at National Review also has this piece on Karlan’s dishonesty in another venue.
Apparently Karlan’s record of dishonesty wasn’t enough to deter Eric Holder. After all, dishonesty is all the rage in his Justice Department. Just this month, DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz sent Holder a memo, covered here at PJ Media, cautioning Holder about the perception that various DOJ officials have a troubled relationship with the truth. Some have committed perjury and are still employed at DOJ.
Horowitz also warned Holder about the perception that the Justice Department is enforcing election laws in a way that is perceived as partisan.
With Karlan, Holder gets a two-fer: dishonesty and partisanship.
That seems to be what leftist legal analysts like Jeffrey Toobin like so much about Karlan moving to DOJ. Toobin doesn’t mention her history of false scholarship. Her hackish friends in academia never mention it either, ever.
Instead, to Toobin, this radical fibber is a “sharp progressive.” None of Karlan’s defenders dare mention her false scholarship. Dishonesty by “sharp progressives” is always forgiven by not-as-sharp progressives. Holder naming this dishonest radical to oversee federal election law enforcement demonstrates, once again, that the truth is optional at his Justice Department.
When Obama political appointees at the Justice Department interfered in the voter intimidation case against the New Black Panther Party, the Washington Post couldn’t be bothered. But when political appointees overrule career prosecutors and delay the indictment of Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell for corruption, that’s a front page above-the-fold story.
The Washington Post reports today that Deputy Attorney General James Cole overruled the recommendations to seek indictments of McDonnell by both career prosecutors in the United States Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Virginia, as well as the recommendation of United States Attorney Dana Boente.
This same DOJ unit in Virginia was also responsible for the successful prosecution of Congressman William “Frozen Cash” Jefferson (D-LA).
McDonnell is under criminal investigation for a variety of actions related to his relationship with the head of a nutritional supplement company that makes a product based on tobacco. Jonnie R. Williams Sr. gave McDonnell, and his wife Maureen, a variety of gifts and perks such as dresses, loans, rounds of golf, trips and a Rolex watch.
Career prosecutors have been methodically building a criminal case against McDonnell for over a year. Typically, the Justice Department waits until after an election to indict the accused so that the indictment will not have an effect on the election. With the election over weeks ago, indictments of McDonnell were expected. That’s when the political leadership at Justice intervened. The Washington Post:
The plan to seek the felony charges this week changed, however, after attorneys for the state’s first couple met with Deputy Attorney General James M. Cole on Dec. 12. . . . On Friday, the day after the meeting, McDonnell’s attorneys were told that the decision would be put on hold, the people said. A final decision about whether to press charges is now not expected before Jan. 2 and could come as late as February, they said.
James Cole is the #2 man at DOJ. He has been knee-deep in a cornucopia of bad behavior at the Justice Department including Fast and Furious, meddling in the drafting of reports by independent DOJ lawyers appointed by a federal judge in a case infested with DOJ misconduct, and the secret monitoring of reporter’s emails such as James Rosen at Fox.
Some might ask, well isn’t Cole working for a Democrat and McDonnell is a Republican? Sure, but the favors delivered by James Cole to Governor McDonnell aren’t about party. They are all about insiders and connections.
Few Americans facing criminal charges brought by the DOJ would enjoy an audience with the number two man at the Justice Department before those charges are pursued. Few Americans facing criminal charges would enjoy any favors from DOJ.
Consider the case of several New Orleans police officers facing prosecution from Cole’s Civil Rights Division. No favors came from Cole in their case. Instead, Cole dished out a swarm of edits on an internal report about DOJ misconduct demanded by a federal judge. The edits were designed to downplay prosecutorial misconduct by DOJ prosecutors. Cole wasn’t successful in concealing the scope of the misconduct as the federal judge eventually threw out multiple convictions because of Cole’s behavior and the behavior of his subordinate lawyers.
In Washington D.C. these days, the connected get favors. Those without connections feel the full fury of the DOJ, with brazen dishonesty to a federal court thrown in for good measure.
Governor McDonnell, by executive policy, made it a priority of his office to give thousands of felons the ability to vote in the 2013 general election, an election that GOP Attorney General Candidate Mark Obenshain lost by a few hundred votes.
Virginia Republican Frank Wolf has announced he won’t seek re-election. His statement is below in full. Wolf has been instrumental in holding Eric Holder’s Justice Department accountable and was a leading voice for answers regarding the New Black Panther voter intimidation case dismissal, misconduct by FBI and DOJ officials and a variety of other important matters.
“I have decided not to seek re-election to the U.S. Congress in 2014. It has been an honor to serve the people of northern Virginia and the Shenandoah Valley. I thank my constituents for giving me the privilege of representing them in Congress for 34 years.
“As a follower of Jesus, I am called to work for justice and reconciliation, and to be an advocate for those who cannot speak for themselves. I plan to focus my future work on human rights and religious freedom – both domestic and international – as well as matters of the culture and the American family. My passion for these issues has been influenced by the examples of President Ronald Reagan, former Congressmen Jack Kemp and Tony Hall, Chuck Colson, and the life of 10th century Member of Parliament William Wilberforce.
“I want to thank the many excellent former and current members of my staff who have helped me serve the people of the 10th District. I am also grateful to my wife, Carolyn, and my family, who have faithfully stood by me all these many years.”
President Obama has appointed Debo Adegbile to replace Tom Perez as Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights. Perez was confirmed to be Secretary of Labor without a single Republican vote. Adegbile hails from the NAACP Legal Defense Fund, an organization that has pushed a radical racial agenda including attacks on election integrity measures, opposition to criminal background checks for hiring, and racial hiring quotas for state and local governments.
Here is a brief Adegbile filed on behalf of the “Black Student Alliance” arguing that a white applicant was properly denied admission to the University of Texas Law School because she was white.
While overseeing the NAACP LDF, the organization offered legal representation to Mumia Abu-Jamal, the murderer of Philadelphia police officer Danny Faulkner. (See video of LDF lawyers addressing a pro-Mumia crowd and discussing LDF’s legal representation of Mumia.)
If you thought Tom Perez was a radical, Adegbile’s background promises to bring even more racially radicalized policies to the Justice Department.
Adegbile’s name was mentioned as a possible nominee to the federal bench. Because of his advocacy for racialist policies, such a nomination would face serious confirmation difficulties. But in Eric Holder’s Justice Department, nakedly racialist policies are standard fare, and Adegbile will fit right in.
This is an an-your-face nomination. This is the White House sending a message to Republicans and conservatives that the radical racial policies of the Justice Department will continue full speed ahead. (I documented many of those pre-2011 actions in Injustice). Any thought that Obama would moderate as a lame duck with collapsing poll numbers vanishes with the Adegbile nomination.
As expected, the reaction from the civil rights industry has been glowing. A press release:
Adegbile is one of the nation’s leading civil rights attorneys. In addition to a lengthy resume of public service, he has argued two of the most important civil rights cases of the 21st century when he twice defended the Voting Rights Act in the Supreme Court.
One of those two cases related to Section 4 of the Voting Rights Act, the provision which gave the federal government the power to oversee elections in 15 states, a power it abused, and a power the Supreme Court terminated in June 2013. DOJ is currently trying to place Texas and North Carolina back under federal control.
Incidentally, Adegbile lost both of the Voting Rights Act cases he argued in the Supreme Court. Although he suffered only a partial defeat in NAMUDNO — where the Court empowered the petitioner the right to seek a bailout that Adegbile and the NAACP insisted was unavailable to entities like NAMUDNO — he ultimately experienced a devastating loss in Shelby County when the Court invalidated the coverage formula under Section 5 of the VRA as unconstitutional.
But in the Obama Justice Department, the law is not as important as the cause. And with Adegbile, the cause is racialist.
Right now, Republican Mark Obenshain is facing a dwindling lead in the race for attorney general in Virginia. Today, most counties processed provisional votes and submitted totals. Obenshain’s lead is down to just a few dozen out of over two million votes cast. (See my PJ Media piece, “Obenshain, a Reason to Vote in Virginia Tuesday.) The review isn’t over, with Fairfax County waiting until Tuesday to complete the process.
PJ Media spent 2013 reporting how Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell teamed up with the Soros-funded Advancement Project to ram through administrative changes to ensure thousands of felons would be automatically allowed to vote in this election. Senator Obenshain led GOP opposition in the Virginia Senate to the legislative change, and McDonnell’s proposal thankfully died in the Virginia House.
That didn’t stop Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell. Taking a page from President Obama’s executive-order playbook, McDonnell rammed through, by edict, what the legislature would not give the governor power to do: automatically approve felons to participate in the 2013 election. The Virginia governor even put out a press release quoting the notoriously leftist Advancement Project and praising himself for teaming with the left to rush through felon voting by executive decision. Seriously.
Why would he do this? As I wrote at the Washington Times:
Republican elected officials must realize that when it comes to election process issues such as felon voting and voter photo identification laws, they are regularly outsmarted by the organized left. Republicans who support their opponents’ election law agenda will gain no friends, at least not friends they should want.
Some Republicans think they can gain love from the left. They don’t realize the left is out to destroy conservatives and the GOP, not make friends. And some Republicans start acting strangely when they are facing possible federal indictments for corruption. Remember Illinois Governor George Ryan?
Matt Vespa has this piece at PJ Tatler praising the virtues of the New Model RNC Army campaign, now being deployed in Virginia.
“They gave him a communications plan, along with ways to execute outreach into the black, Latino, and Asian communities. . . . We are in communities we’ve never been in before . . . we have conducted both mainstream and ethnic media training efforts . . . The RNC has a total of seven paid staffers dedicated to engaging minority communities and have attended numerous events on behalf of the Republican Party. The RNC has also done significant paid print, radio, and TV advertising in ethnic media outlets.”
The plan seems heavy on racial identity politics. What it lacks, perhaps, is getting Republicans and conservatives activated.
True, an anecdote does not a trend make, but here are some troubling facts.
I have voted in numerous Republican primaries in Virginia.
Number of pieces of direct mail, emails, telephone calls or door knocks I received from either the RNC, Republican Party of Virginia or the Cuccinelli campaign: Zero.
Perhaps they were too busy with ethnic media outlets.
Now, to be fair, I moved in early 2013 and thereafter changed my voter registration.
But that didn’t stop Democrats from hitting me with lots of literature and campaign contacts at my new address. In fact, I received literature and calls from the Virginia Democratic Party, the McAuliffe campaign, and various lefty groups.
All they had to do is buy an updated voter list.
One side did it. The other side apparently didn’t.
Remember that on Tuesday night if the results go badly for the GOP.
Outreach to people who never voted for a Republican won’t do much good when people who often do vote Republican are forgotten.
Let’s compare the failure to execute the run-up-the middle and simply get an updated list to contact me with what the Democrats have at their disposal.
A local election official told me that the Democrat party rejected a poll worker this fall as an insufficiently loyal democrat because the voter five years ago said in a telephone poll that they did not support the Democrat U.S. Senate nominee.
Think about that. One side doesn’t mail a current voter list, while the other side has a database so powerful they are rejecting poll officials for subversive thoughts during the Bush administration.
It’s like Terry McAuliffe has the NSA on staff. (By the way, the name of the databank is Catalist.)
Meanwhile, Republican consultants are too busy tripping over their bank accounts to play nice and cooperate to build a conservative response.
Let’s see how the Democrat-lite, ignore-the-base, watered down racial identity politics works on Tuesday for Virginia Republicans. If the GOP wins despite a 1990′s style ground game, I’ll gladly eat crow, and gladly accept campaign junk mail next year.
The Washington Post is comfortable in the role of crusader. Usually the crusade manifests itself against local Republican candidates. Now the crusade as turned against the Washington Redskins.
Not content to write about balls and strikes, wins and losses, the sportswriters at the Post now fancy themselves cultural observers and political pundits.
Chief among the crusaders are sports columnists Mike Wise and Sally Jenkins.
The pair have done the impossible. They’ve made Redskins owner Daniel Snyder look sympathetic.
Wise and Jenkins have teamed up with the familiar gang of race hustlers and identity activists to turn the Post sports section into a regular anti-Redskins crusade. They must not be familiar with the term – unsubscribe (which one can do at 202-334-6100).
Today Wise waxes on about Roger Goodell being on the “wrong side of history,” as if he is Theodore Bilbo or George Wallace.
It’s the same familiar formula: 1) Small numeric minority shakes down powerful interest in the name of race; 2) Pavlovian response from lefty media follows.
Never mind the fact that most American Indians like the name Redskins. Never mind the fact that almost 80 percent of Americans, including blacks and Hispanics, are just fine with the name.
Sally Jenkins isn’t much better. She wrote this admittedly funny but totally intellectually dishonest satire about Snyder’s effort to explain to the Redskins fan base why the name is here to stay.
Jenkins and Wise are symptomatic of what else is wrong with Washington. A small number of people who think they know better, and who possess power, seek to impose their views on the rest of the nation. They are convinced they are more enlightened than the rest of us. Their perch at the paper gives them asymmetrical leverage over the American people.
But most folks don’t think they are enlightened. Most folks think they are nuts.
Mark Levin was right when he said the only offensive part of “Washington Redskins,” is Washington.
So Hail to the Redskins from this Steelers fan. Wise and Jenkins have done the impossible. In making the Redskins the victim of yet another race hustling campaign, they’ve made them a team to cheer.
Bryan Preston has this piece about Nasty Obama People threatening CNN reporters. Bryan notes:
Carol Costello hosted a segment on the senior White House aide recently fired for — not making this up — inappropriate tweets, she admitted that the Obama administration has no problem getting “nasty” with reporters who dare to report any negative story about Obama. . . . Costello agreed with panelist Jason Johnson that the Obama administration can be thin-skinned, and said that “President Obama’s people can be quite nasty. . . . This may explain a lot about the past several years, and especially the last year. How many reporters who may have wanted to report on Fast and Furious, Benghazi and any number of stories that cast Obama in a bad light have been intimidated and threatened out of pursuing those stories?
PJ Media has been covering the nastiness of the Obama press spokespeople for years. The nastiest of the nasty is former Justice Department press flunkie Tracy Schmaler.
Schmaler developed a reputation for screaming at journalists who asked any tough questions. These included Pete Williams at NBC, Quinn Hillyer at the American Spectator and Matt Boyle at Breitbart. PJ Media covered the nastiness of Obama press flunkies here (“DOJ Shrieker in Chief”) and here and here and here. These are government employees for whom civility is not a priority, even if the President claims that it is.
Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell is doing all he can to make sure Virginia Republicans lose statewide election next month. If it’s not free Rolexes, free rounds of golf or having the taxpayers pay for dry cleaning for his adult children, it’s making sure felons get to vote.
The mess surrounding McDonnell is dragging down the Republican ticket where Democrat nominee Terry McAuliffe now leads Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli in most polls. The sleaze in Richmond must run awfully deep for someone like McAuliffe to be leading.
This week, Bob McDonnell followed through in making sure that thousands of felons are automatically allowed to vote in November’s election. I covered McDonnell’s folly in the Washington Times, Virginia Democrats Get New Demographic: the Felon Vote:
Prohibiting felons from voting is also a moral imperative. Those who have shown contempt for criminal laws should have no voice in the process of writing them. Giving felons a say in the legislative process means laws will naturally skew more toward the criminal, to the detriment of the law-abiding citizen.
McDonnell defied the will of the Virginia House, and by executive policy, implemented a policy in 2013 that legislature specifically rejected.
Sounds like Barack Obama.
Under McDonnell’s decree, some felons have their voting rights automatically restored instead of having to undergo an individualized examination of their remorse and their conscience.
Every social science study ever produced shows that felons vote for Democrats at a rate of around 9:1. McDonnell has reinstated nearly 7,000.
Had felons been permitted to vote in every state, Republicans would have lost 3 Presidential elections they won, and control of the Senate would not have been in GOP hands for many years. That’s why Democrats are so interested in the issue.
So why would McDonnell do this?
There are a couple of reasons. First, according to many people close to McDonnell, he is obsessed with being liked, even more than being right.
But the second, and biggest, reason is that McDonnell fully misunderstands the radical racialist left. Like Republicans from decades ago, he thinks he can buy peace through concessions. He almost vetoed the Virginia voter ID law in 2012. It took a heavy lobbying effort, including from other GOP Governors, to talk McDonnell down off the ledge from a voter ID veto. He feared what the NAACP might do to him. But, as I wrote at the Times:
The NAACP and ACLU have lost the moral high ground they had a half-century ago. These “civil rights” groups have become mere cogs in the partisan electoral machine of the organized left. They support felon voting because it helps elect Democrats, not for any other reason.
These groups also have a tendency to cast aside any short-term Republican allies they can trick. Friendship, praise and higher office cannot be gained by capitulation to their agenda. Hopefully, Virginia Republicans will realize there is only peril in supporting the cause of criminals and the Democratic Party.
The Governor’s office issued a press release this week trumpeting McDonnell’s efforts to open up voting for felons. The release actually gives space for quotes from the radical Soros-funded Advancement Project. Priorities, I suppose. Yet praise elsewhere among the left for McDonnell is almost non-existent, with some saying he has not gone far enough. It’s that old familiar one-way ratchet, always seeking more from Republicans quick to cave.
According to the press release, McDonnell has even added staff to speed up the process of getting felons processed, just in time for November’s election. Again, priorities. The press release actually crows about this:
The restoration of rights division now employs six staffers, four of whom were just hired in July to implement the new system. The Secretary of the Commonwealth’s office has worked diligently with the Clerks of Court, the Supreme Court, the State Police, the State Board of Elections, the Department of Corrections and many other stakeholder groups to streamline and automate the system.
Under the old system, each felon had to make an individualized application to show they were worthy of reinstatement. Automatic redemption has no place, either in any theology, or as government policy. An individualized examination of conscience was the Commonwealth’s policy for almost a century.
If the GOP experiences a wipeout in November, especially a close one, they might thank Governor Bob McDonnell. Too many Rolexes, catered weddings, golf clubs – and ultimately – felons at the polls, may bring bad news for the Virginia GOP.
Main Justice is a barely read blog that serves as a private mouthpiece for Eric Holder’s operation. I covered their intellectually dishonest coverage of racialist policies at the Justice Department here at PJ Media.
I have just learned from James O’Keefe that he has sued Main Justice for defamation, and that they have been served.
Main Justice has covered O’Keefe’s battle with disgraced U.S. Attorney Jim Letten in New Orleans. (So has PJ Media here). O’Keefe confronted Letten about his prosecution of O’Keefe. Letten is now a dean at Tulane Law school. The federal court in New Orleans eviscerated the conduct of Justice Department lawyers under his supervision in a 129-page opinion dismissing criminal convictions against 5 New Orleans police officers.
O’Keefe is suing Main Justice for claiming he tampered with phone lines inside a U.S. Senate office. O’Keefe takes special care to release full length videos.
O’Keefe asked for a retraction for the story, but only received snark in return from Main Justice publisher Mary Jacoby.
Mary Jacoby at Main Justice doesn’t think much of the conservative media. She wrote to O’Keefe’s staff this email about O’Keefe’s efforts:
Hello Daniel –
As bone fide journalists, we strive for accuracy and will add a clarification at your request. However, please spare me the indignation – no serious person would pull this kind of stunt.
No large Washington D.C. lawfirm has lined up to represent O’Keefe, yet. That’s a benefit reserved for liberal defamation plaintiffs.
Yesterday, I asked: “Is Kirkland and Ellis Pursuing Breitbart’s Widow Pro Bono?”
Today, thanks to the work of Aaron Worthing, we learn the disgraceful answer: “Yes, and then some.”
(Read the first story: “Vampires, Shirley Sherrod Lawyers Seek to Sue Andrew Breitbart’s Widow.” We also learned yesterday that Kirkland and Ellis is attacking North Carolina Voter ID for free.)
Aaron Worthing did what no reporter appears to have done in the last couple of years — simply ask Kirkland and Ellis who is paying for the lawsuit against Andrew Breitbart, Larry O’Connor, and now Andrew’s widow, Susie.
Here’s what Worthing found:
So in the response to my letter, still on background, a person speaking for the firm stated that, yes, this was a pro-bono case. Which I have to tell you, is really odd. Ordinarily pro bono cases are about poor people, or otherwise people who have trouble standing up for themselves, or rarely people who shouldn’t have to hire lawyers — like people seeking to end discrimination.
Sherrod, despite her husband receiving $13,000,000 as part of a Pigford settlement, is getting free legal representation from Kirkland and Ellis. That Kirkland and Ellis takes on lawsuits against Breitbart’s widow and North Carolina over voter ID pro bono tells you a great deal about the firm.
Nearly 80% of America supports voter ID, including the Supreme Court. And nearly 100% of America opposes harassing widows in court.
The firm apparently thought the standing it would gain among clients and the public would be greater than the grief it would get by taking the two controversial cases. Perhaps that calculation was wrong.
Notice how a source at Kirkland and Ellis tells Worthing that the lawsuit isn’t aimed at Brietbart’s widow, but rather his estate. Aaron Worthing dispenses with that B.S. nicely by noting:
But that estate is what she and Andrew’s four children are going to live off of. You can’t pretend they aren’t endangering those children’s future.
Further, the statement that Kirkland and Ellis isn’t directing the lawsuit against the widow is an outright lie. Read the pleading that Kirkland filed, which plainly states:
Plaintiff Shirley Sherrod respectfully moves to substitute “Susannah Breitbart, as successor to Andrew Breitbart, Deceased” in place of now-deceased Defendant Andrew Breitbart.
Anyone see the word “estate” in that sentence?
And, as Worthing rightly notes, even if it did appear it wouldn’t matter. The “estate” is how Susie will feed and educate her children. Chalk up the too-clever response to Worthing by Kirkland as an example of how lawyers can become so convinced of the correctness of their position that the realities of life cannot penetrate the misconception. The same could be said of much of the culture inside the Beltway. The realities of life outside the Beltway seem to have no effect on the culture of entitlement, plenty and arrogance within.
PJ Media Rule of Law: Vampires, Shirley Sherrod Lawyers Seek to Sue Widow of Andrew Breitbart.
It turns out that the clients of Kirkland and Ellis are also indirectly supporting the attack on North Carolina’s new Voter Identification law. From the Winston Salem Journal:
Additionally within one hour of the voter suppression bill being signed earlier this year, the NC NAACP filed a suit. The Advancement Project, the Kirkland and Ellis law firm acting pro bono, Adam Stein of Chapel Hill, the former partner of the late Julius Chambers, Atty. Irv Joyner, and assisted by Atty Jamie Phillips and Atty. Al McSurley represent the NC NAACP in its suit.
How can a law firm afford to donate attorney time to an attack on election integrity laws like North Carolina voter ID?
Simple: Keep the rates of paying clients high enough so that the paying clients end up subsidizing the salaries of the attorneys working for free for the North Carolina NAACP’s attack on voter ID. Here is the complaint naming the Kirkland and Ellis lawyers attacking North Carolina voter ID.
What do we discover in the complaint? Thomas Yannucci, the same lawyer representing Shirley Sherrod in her efforts to sue Breitbart’s widow, is the same lawyer attacking North Carolina voter ID.
The pages for the other Kirkland and Ellis lawyers are here: Daniel Donovan, Susan Davies, Winn Allen, Uzoma Nkwonta, Kim Knudson, Anne Dechter and the lawyer who multitasks between attacking Breitbart and North Carolina, Thomas Yannucci.
We learn from these firm pages that the paying clients of the lawyers working pro bono include: Wyndham, Honeywell, AOL, Bayer, BP, Coca-Cola, Raytheon, Chiquita, HBO, Hershey Foods, Verizon and General Motors.
So next time you buy that Coke or Buick, remember where you money might be going.
I have this post over at Rule of Law how the wicked Shirley Sherrod is now pursuing Andrew Breitbart’s lovely widow Susie Breitbart in court. Her lawyers at Kirkland and Ellis have filed this pleading, seeking to drag Susie into the lawsuit Sherrod filed in 2011.
But Sherrod’s lawyers at Kirkland & Ellis filed this pleading seeking to drag Susie into the lawsuit. They are trying to bore into her own personal estate, the estate which will be used to raise her four fatherless children. The pleading coldly notes:
Plaintiff’s lawsuit against Mr. Breitbart was timely filed, survives his death, and may be continued against his successor. See D.C. Code § 12-101; . . . .(“Except as provided in Sections 11446, 13552, 13553, and 13554, upon the death of a married person, the surviving spouse is personally liable for the debts of the deceased spouse chargeable against the property described in Section 13551 to the extent provided in Section 13551.
So who’s paying Sherrod’s legal bills for the litigation against Susie Brietbart? Wouldn’t the media have asked by now? Curiosity about funding is not an equal opportunity question.
There are three-and-a-half possibilities for who is paying Sherrod’s bills.
The first, and most unlikely, possibility is that Shirley Sherrod is paying her own bills. You can count on two things at big law firms like Kirkland and Ellis, expensive art on the walls, and big bills. The combination of the two has led to a wipeout of once-lucrative careers at Big Law, and the wipeout or merger of many struggling Big Law firms. Like most everything else in the economy over the last decade, clients are seeking smaller, lower cost solutions with comparable effectiveness. It is highly unlikely Shirley Sherrod is paying the exceedingly large hourly rates that Kirkland still charges.
The second possibility is that Sherrod has a Sugar Daddy (definition 2). There are plenty of leftist Sugar Daddies who would relish harassing Andrew Breitbart. Some of them are wicked enough even to harass his widow. They probably haven’t read Deuteronomy’s command to not take the garment of the widow, or the call to protect the widow throughout Scripture. More likely, the wickedness of the act doesn’t trouble them. It’s Breitbart we’re talking about, and mention of his name sends them into a froth. If a Sugar Daddy is funding Sherrod’s case, then Sherrod ought to say so. She ought to confess that the lawsuit is a crusade funded by outsiders, and not about justice.
The third (and a half) possibility is that Kirkland and Ellis is funding the lawsuit against Breitbart. They might take the matter on a contingency fee. When you are finished laughing, consider the other means they can fund the lawsuit. Big Law has become notorious for helping left wing causes for free. They use the money from paying clients, like AOL, Boeing, Walgreens, Avis and others in other matters to subsidize left wing litigation. That’s how the attacks on voter ID by Kirkland and Ellis are funded. That’s how GITMO terrorists got free representation at Covington and Burling.
But don’t right wing causes also enjoy a similar subsidy?
Mark Levin threw down the gauntlet tonight on his show.
Addressing the National Park Service and Obama administration, he said:
“You lay one hand on any of these World War II vets trying to visit the World War II memorial, one hand, and I’ll have half a million people there at that memorial.”
Levin went on to talk about members of his family that fought at Iwo Jima and Guam.
Any other day, these five parking places pictured below are available for use on the George Washington Parkway near Washington D.C. The GW Parkway is a national park. There is no fee to park in them. There are no National Park Service employees who do anything at all with them. But not today. Shutdown Theatre is playing nationwide, and the barricades are props.
Today the barricades went up. Unlike any other day, today National Park Service employees had to go to these parking places and erect barricades. More time, energy and money was spent erecting barricades to create phony drama surrounding the shutdown than is spent on a normal day. Without such theatre, most Americans might not even notice that the federal government has shut down.
RNC Chairman Reince Preibus says at Breitbart:
Today Republicans won a major victory against the mainstream media.
When NBC and CNN announced their plans for pro-Hillary productions, the RNC voted to ban them from presidential primary debates. Conservatives united in calling out their blatant liberal bias and support for Hillary Clinton’s all-but-announced candidacy. Even liberal commentators’ eyes were opened to the network’s partisan actions.
After all that pressure and bad publicity, both CNN and NBC announced they were canceling their productions today.
So CNN dropped a Hillary documentary under a threat that CNN wouldn’t be allowed to participate in primary debates. Point RNC.
But there is a far bigger issue about presidential debates, and one that will continue to destroy Republican nominees in the fall of 2016 if it isn’t resolved.
Republicans on the Commission for Presidential Debates must stop agreeing to allow left wing journalists conduct the fall debates.
Consider 2012. The four debates had four moderators in total. All four were hard left leaning journalists: Jim Lehrer, Martha Raddatz, Bob Shieffer and Candy Crowley. Crowley was especially poorly behaved. Her factually inaccurate attack on Mitt Romney helped swing the debate, and the election to Obama by making Romney gun shy to talk about Benghazi – both in the debate and afterwards.
So how do four leftists get picked to moderate Presidential debates? Why not fight to include balance, or, pull out of the process.
Republicans on the Commission on Presidential Debates agreed to the four in 2012. That’s right – Obama attended Raddatz’s wedding, and then she was picked to moderate a debate. Crowley is so far in the tank for the left that Google can’t even disguise her teamwork with Team DNC.
The Republican member later had regrets that Crowley was allowed to serve as moderator, but the damage was already done.
So where is Britt Hume or Megyn Kelly when it comes to the fall Presidential debates?
I appeared on a panel with Breitbart’s Joel Pollack at last years CPAC. Joel gave some advice Republicans should heed – stop worrying about what the so-called mainstream media does. Stop giving interviews only to the New York Times. Utilize the vast emerging new media to push your message, don’t attack or shun it. Go on conservative talk radio.
Otherwise 2012 will repeat.
It’s nice that CNN is no longer going to run a documentary on Hillary that nobody would have seen anyway. But people will be watching the Presidential debates in 2016. Republicans simply cannot allow a repeat of the same debate catastrophes of the past. They have to fight where the action is. The Commission on Presidential Debates cannot be permitted to stack the deck with Martha Raddataz, and her ilk in 2016. Who moderates the fall debates has more to do with who becomes President than a Hillary documentary airing on CNN.