Get PJ Media on your Apple

The PJ Tatler

The Real Reason Why Liberals Are Scared of Women with Guns

Confronting the disinformation campaign in the War on Women.

by
Susan L.M. Goldberg

Bio

July 9, 2014 - 4:08 am
Page 1 of 2  Next ->   View as Single Page

hollyhobbylobby

Between girls hunting big game to feed starving children in Africa to mothers bearing arms and Bibles on social media, America either needs another birth control issue or an exorcist to stop the head spinning of the most illiberal liberals among us.

Conservatives are quick to distinguish a Christian supporter of the Second Amendment (in this case, Holly Hobby Lobby) from a jihadist:

…[this] “dangerous strand of Christian fundamentalism” is so extraordinarily “dangerous” that it has not only failed to engender any “real violence” but it can’t even bring itself to threaten harm?

And we excel at drawing attention to the moral ineptitude of the pro-abortion community’s outrage at the site of tranquilized or hunted game:

Many of the liberal blogs having a meltdown over Kendall Jones are the same ones that spent a week hailing Emily Letts, who filmed her own abortion. ‘What kind of monster smiles after killing something?’ they say about the woman posing with a tranquilized rhino, but not about the woman giggling while an abortionist executes her baby.

But what we fail to clearly answer is why independent women pose such an inherent threat to the Left. After all, isn’t this the group whose messiah bows to Valerie Jarrett, goddess-in-chief?

Comments are closed.

Top Rated Comments   
Funny, I have no difficulty telling the difference between the pictures of the two women.

The one on the left is holding up her rifle of choice, holding the Holy Book of her choice, wearing the clothes of her choice... and, I am sure, getting photographed by choice. HER choice.

The one on the right must wear what she is told, has no choice whatsoever about which religion to follow, is no doubt under orders to hold up the rifle she was handed before she goes out to kill the people she was ordered to kill... and is, perhaps, being permitted to venture out without a male guardian for the first time in her adult life.

The woman on the left is holding a rifle because she wants to -- and she probably owns it, and paid for it with her own money. The one on the right was almost certainly not given a choice in anything.

America remains the Land of Opportunity -- which means CHOICE.
15 weeks ago
15 weeks ago Link To Comment
That "magnificent animal". Oh, please. That lion would kill you in a minute. You sound like the idiots sympathizing with the terrible plight of the polar bears, one of the most terrifying predators on the planet.

And for those who don't know, many of those big game hunters donate the meat to locals to eat. You probably don't think of that, because you don't think of lions as food, because you don't know what it is like to actually be starving. I do. I used to go days without food as a kid. I have eaten horsemeat. Best beef ever. I have eaten rattler. Best chicken ever. I would have no qualms about eating cat or dog or lion or polar bear, because I know what it is to starve. Those big-game hunters feed starving people.
15 weeks ago
15 weeks ago Link To Comment
I don't suppose you draw this conclusion when it comes to a son emulating his father.
15 weeks ago
15 weeks ago Link To Comment
All Comments   (72)
All Comments   (72)
Sort: Newest Oldest Top Rated
It is so much simpler than this article postulates.

Regressives do not like women with guns - because they can turn the word "No" into a complete sentence by adding punctuation.

(True, with some loads, they might have to utter as many as three complete sentences to clarify their communication.)
15 weeks ago
15 weeks ago Link To Comment
:D

15 weeks ago
15 weeks ago Link To Comment
Nothing illustrates the "Kindergarten of Eden" better than the Leftards on these photos. He should change the cover of the 2nd edition of his book to these two photos.
15 weeks ago
15 weeks ago Link To Comment
The woman on the left is an ally in the present fight against mandatory contraception coverage. (I don't think I would agree with the political opinions of her great-grandparents.)

The woman on the right is the great-grandmother of people who will fight to keep circumcision legal. (I don't think I would agree with her political opinions.)

The difference is time.
15 weeks ago
15 weeks ago Link To Comment
“Wild animals don't mess with you if you don't mess with them”

Sure, tell that to the hundreds of people killed every year by Wild Tigers in places like India.

The truth is, in EVERY SINGLE PLACE that humankind has ever settled, predatory animals have been a constant danger. Life was never safe until they were hunted off into extinction or isolation. Hunting isn’t exclusively about food.

The whole REASON places like Africa and India openly invite legal “trophy hunters” to kill large (usually predatory) animals is to make life SAFER for the local Human Population, AND to help preserve whats left of the remaining “wild” environment . Too many Big Cats one area may decimate prey species like antelope and gazelle. Too many Rhinos and Zebras in another may be overly taxing the remaining trees and grass lands. Using it to generate revenue (and we all want third world countries to have more MONEY right?) just makes good environmental AND economic sense.

Oh, but we don’t like “Trophy Hunters” now , some sort of moral issue with that? News Flash Skippy, the whole idea of “Trophy Hunting”, that is to say, the specific targeting the larger more dominant Alpha Males is THE BEST THING for the remaining herd, whether its Lions or Tigers or Bears (oh my!)

Because the Super-Dominant Alpha Males tend to prevent ANY OTHER males from ever mating…and taking some of them out of the equation from time to time actually INCREASES the genetic diversity of the remaining “herd”. Get that? Diversity. Arent we all for DIVERSITY!?

The problem is, your Typical Suburban American Yuppie who gets “outraged” by these sorts of things generally doesn’t understand the difference between “maul” and “mall”. These are The Ignorant People, full of Ignorant Concepts of how the world actually works…the ones who never lived without power windows and air conditioning, and who need to be told (in writing, on the f*cking cup!) that their Starbucks Coffee is : “Caution: hot!”

Unfortunately for the rest of us, the Taming of the Wild has removed the “natural selection process” that would have otherwise eliminated them from being the annoying, self-important whiners that they are…postulating their foolish ideas about cute little animals and evil gun-toting villians

15 weeks ago
15 weeks ago Link To Comment
"...the whole idea of “Trophy Hunting”, that is to say, the specific targeting the larger more dominant Alpha Males is THE BEST THING for the remaining herd, whether its Lions or Tigers or Bears (oh my!)...actually INCREASES the genetic diversity of the remaining “herd”."

A pretty convoluted human calculation there.

Why doesn't the intrepid Trophy Hunter use a knife or a spear instead of firing a high powered rifle from a mile away to "take down" the unsuspecting animal ?

Level the playing field, so to speak.
15 weeks ago
15 weeks ago Link To Comment
“Wild animals don't mess with you if you don't mess with them”

That's my experience, Root. (see below)

I'm not going on a solo hike, however, and calculating my chances of survival if I meet a Mama bear and her cubs on the trail, especially if I inadvertently got between her and them.

Who decides how many is "too many" Big Cats or Rhinos or Zebras or whatever in a given area?

Some dumb human who proceeds to devise a program of wildlife management which, in turn, has consequences all up and down the food chain that said dumb human did not and cannot calculate ?
15 weeks ago
15 weeks ago Link To Comment
We don't like trophy hunting unless it is an indigenous rite of passage for the GLORIOUS NOBLE SAVAGES. Because, you know, white people.
15 weeks ago
15 weeks ago Link To Comment
Funny, I have no difficulty telling the difference between the pictures of the two women.

The one on the left is holding up her rifle of choice, holding the Holy Book of her choice, wearing the clothes of her choice... and, I am sure, getting photographed by choice. HER choice.

The one on the right must wear what she is told, has no choice whatsoever about which religion to follow, is no doubt under orders to hold up the rifle she was handed before she goes out to kill the people she was ordered to kill... and is, perhaps, being permitted to venture out without a male guardian for the first time in her adult life.

The woman on the left is holding a rifle because she wants to -- and she probably owns it, and paid for it with her own money. The one on the right was almost certainly not given a choice in anything.

America remains the Land of Opportunity -- which means CHOICE.
15 weeks ago
15 weeks ago Link To Comment
Nothing illustrates the "Kindergarten of Eden" better than the Leftards on these photos. He should change the cover of the 2nd edition of his book to these two photos.
15 weeks ago
15 weeks ago Link To Comment
I know several guys who have gone over to Africa to hunt big game. They were after trophies, since you can't very well bring the meat back here, but the meat was not wasted. The great thing that this kind of hunting does is to create and sustain an industry which gives the hunted animals economic value in desperately poor countries. It gives all concerned a good reason to prevent poaching. Unlike poaching, legal hunting can be done in a controlled way that sustains the population. It is the same thing over here. Nobody cares more about keeping good game populations going than hunters, and their license dollars encourage state governments to care about them, too.
15 weeks ago
15 weeks ago Link To Comment
Wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong wrong.

Women with guns don't *have* to rely on politicians and police. They don't need an all-powerful, all knowing state. They can take care of themselves. In other words, the Left's worst nightmare.
15 weeks ago
15 weeks ago Link To Comment
But they have nothing against the women jihadis, even admire them.
15 weeks ago
15 weeks ago Link To Comment
Female jihadis who are sucked into the Islamist ideology & individuals like Palestinian mothers who want all their little toddlers to grow up to kill Jews (and blow themselves to smithereens in the process) are among the dumbest & most venal broads on the planet.
15 weeks ago
15 weeks ago Link To Comment
"Jarrett is the archetype liberal goddess exemplifying exactly what liberals expect of women: complete and total self-sacrifice to the State. She may hold incredible “mind meld”-ing powers over Obama, but in the end Valerie Jarrett is as much a servant as he is to the socialist cause."

Chicago slumlady Valerie is a shallow, bossy twit, and the narcissist-in-chief relies on her worship. (it may be pretend worship but narcissists don't care)

How did such uniformly slimy people come to head up the United States government ?

"Instead of calling out the disinformation at face value, our logical and moral arguments get caught in the spin cycle and hung out to dry. Facts are wonderful things, which is why a climate of disinformation intends to render the truth virtually impossible to comprehend."

That's true, taking the Left's talking points seriously and writing millions of words parsing and/or refuting them keeps you inside their game.

Which is exactly where they want you.
15 weeks ago
15 weeks ago Link To Comment
Don't read to much into Lefty thought. If they hate America for any reason, that is enough. No further thought required. Thought requires value judgements.
15 weeks ago
15 weeks ago Link To Comment
Don't forget Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership jpfo.org. I don't think they're all conservative.
15 weeks ago
15 weeks ago Link To Comment
1 2 Next View All

3 Trackbacks to “The Real Reason Why Liberals Are Scared of Women with Guns”