Get PJ Media on your Apple

The PJ Tatler

by
Bryan Preston

Bio

April 4, 2014 - 11:27 am

This is outrageous. In my old job with the Texas GOP I met with Univision executives and anchors a few times. Univision claims that it wants to be a fair broker to both political parties, but it is increasingly revealing that it’s completely in the tank for the Democrats — even more than the English-language mainstream media.

This email screen shot speaks for itself, and also says quite a lot. It’s a reply from someone who works in Univision. That person received a press release from the RNC’s Communications/Research department. And rejected it out of hand “because I am a Democrat and do not need to read your viewpoints.”

You couldn’t even forward the email to someone who is more open and tolerant?

univision-intolerant

The email says “entravision,” which may be confusing. Entravision ”is the largest affiliate group of both the top-ranked Univision television network and Univision’s UniMas network, with television stations in 19 of the nation’s top 50 Latino markets. The company owns and/or operates 56 primary television stations and also operates one of the nation’s largest groups of primarily Spanish-language radio stations, consisting of 49 owned and operated radio stations. Additionally, Entravision has a variety of cross-platform digital content and sales offerings designed to capitalize on the company’s leadership position within the Latino broadcasting community.”

So this is a Univision person. The question is, is this Univision policy?

Bryan Preston has been a leading conservative blogger and opinionator since founding his first blog in 2001. Bryan is a military veteran, worked for NASA, was a founding blogger and producer at Hot Air, was producer of the Laura Ingraham Show and, most recently before joining PJM, was Communications Director of the Republican Party of Texas.

Comments are closed.

Top Rated Comments   
Given that the Hispanic media is so proudly in the tank for the Democrats they refuse to even receive an email from Republicans, explain to me how amnesty is necessary for the GOP to thrive?
16 weeks ago
16 weeks ago Link To Comment
Why are you covering up the sender's name? Why are you not shaming him into a forced resignation or forcing Univision to fire him/her? We're in a war! They canned Mozilla's CEO. The least we can do is get a low-level employee from Univision canned, and perhaps more if we keep on this story.
16 weeks ago
16 weeks ago Link To Comment
So Univision is only interested in a univiewpoint.
16 weeks ago
16 weeks ago Link To Comment
All Comments   (28)
All Comments   (28)
Sort: Newest Oldest Top Rated
And you wonder why millions of Americans want them deported?? And want the immigrant demographic to change? Parasites, leeches, and ignorant peasants. Let's all celebrate our "diversity".
16 weeks ago
16 weeks ago Link To Comment
I'm tired of tolerating the totalitarians. Enough is enough.
16 weeks ago
16 weeks ago Link To Comment
This is good. Very, very good.

And it should have been sent via scram-jet straight to the Federal Elections Committee. Univision is now a documented Democratic Asset. Everything they do is subject to FEC review.

However...we still have the Stupid Party. Nothing will be done.
16 weeks ago
16 weeks ago Link To Comment
I like this New Transparency.
16 weeks ago
16 weeks ago Link To Comment
I'd burn him/her in a heart beat. They're relying on you to play fair and shield them. That way they can titter to each other and say "me chingue ha los gabachos!" It's not like were going to get anything out of this.
Do it! Bryan, no seas pendejo!
16 weeks ago
16 weeks ago Link To Comment
I concur. Reveal the employee's name.... and sic Anonymous on 'em.
16 weeks ago
16 weeks ago Link To Comment
Onevision and that is marxist.
16 weeks ago
16 weeks ago Link To Comment
Why wouldn't supremacists who have no interest in a thing like the Constitution prefer the Dems who advance their cause for them? As is usual in an Orwellian Kafkatrap, the only people who are racists are the ones who aren't.
16 weeks ago
16 weeks ago Link To Comment
With blacks, it's all black uber alles and hate the other, and with "Latinos", it's "Latino" uber alles, and hate the other, so ... ... ...

It was not part of their blood,
It came to them very late,
With long arrears to make good,
When the Saxon began to hate.

They were not easily moved,
They were icy -- willing to wait
Till every count should be proved,
Ere the Saxon began to hate.

Their voices were even and low.
Their eyes were level and straight.
There was neither sign nor show
When the Saxon began to hate.

It was not preached to the crowd.
It was not taught by the state.
No man spoke it aloud
When the Saxon began to hate.

It was not suddenly bred.
It will not swiftly abate.
Through the chilled years ahead,
When Time shall count from the date
That the Saxon began to hate.
(Rudyard Kipling)
16 weeks ago
16 weeks ago Link To Comment
. . . the English began to hate.

The name of that poem is "The Beginnings".
It refers to World War I.
And it is "the English", not "the Saxons".

From a simple search, it seems white supremacist groups like to replace "English" with "Saxons" for their usual purposes, and it is that alterered version that I see quoted around the internet much more than Kipling's actual verse.
16 weeks ago
16 weeks ago Link To Comment
Given that the Hispanic media is so proudly in the tank for the Democrats they refuse to even receive an email from Republicans, explain to me how amnesty is necessary for the GOP to thrive?
16 weeks ago
16 weeks ago Link To Comment
1 2 Next View All