Margaret Sanger Was a Racist Monster. So Why Did Nancy Pelosi Accept an Award Named After Sanger?
March 28, 2014 - 12:58 pm
Democrat Rep. Nancy Pelosi just might be a racist monster who wants to murder live children for the sake of eliminating “undesirables.” Why would I say such an outrageous thing? Because Pelosi has accepted an award named for Margaret Sanger. And Margaret Sanger was definitely a racist monster who advocated murdering live children for the sake of eliminating “undesirables.”
The most merciful thing that the large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it.
That’s advocating child murder. It’s not racist, but we’re not done.
Sanger considered racial minorities to be “human weeds.” In context, Sanger’s “weeds” quote carries a whiff of the Third Reich.
If plants, and live stock as well, require space and air, sunlight and love, children need them even more. The only real wealth of our country lies in the men and women of the next generation. A farmer would rather produce a thousand thoroughbreds than a million runts.
How are we to breed a race of human thoroughbreds unless we follow the same plan? We must make this country into a garden of children instead of a disorderly back lot overrun with human weeds.
These “human weeds” were, in Sanger’s mind, working-class people, and racial minorities.
Sanger had a plan for weeding out the human race. First, forced sterilization and racial segregation. From Sanger’s Women and the New Race:
[We should] apply a stern and rigid policy of sterilization and segregation to that grade of population whose progeny is tainted, or whose inheritance is such that objectionable traits may be transmitted to offspring.
Sanger also advocated instituting government control over who can and cannot be allowed to have children. From Sanger’s Plan for Peace:
Article 1. The purpose of the American Baby Code shall be to provide for a better distribution of babies… and to protect society against the propagation and increase of the unfit.
Article 4. No woman shall have the legal right to bear a child, and no man shall have the right to become a father, without a permit…
Article 6. No permit for parenthood shall be valid for more than one birth.
Hey, Sanger was “pro-choice,” in a way, as you’ll see on the next page. From Birth Control Review, April 1932:
Give dysgenic groups [people with "bad genes"] in our population their choice of segregation or [compulsory] sterilization.
Was Sanger an advocate of genocide against black people? Sure sounds like it. From Woman, Morality and Birth Control, 1922:
We should hire three or four colored ministers, preferably with social-service backgrounds, and with engaging personalities. The most successful educational approach to the Negro is through a religious appeal. We don’t want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.
Congratulations, Revs. Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton. You have jobs for life.
That’s how Planned Parenthood, which Sanger founded, would sell its plan to plant abortion clinics in and around black neighborhoods, a practice that continues to this day. Despite its claims to the contrary, Planned Parenthood’s business model depends on its abortion business.
So, why is Nancy Pelosi accepting an award named for that monster? And why is no one in the media asking Pelosi if she agrees with everything that Sanger said and did?