Get PJ Media on your Apple

The PJ Tatler

by
Bryan Preston

Bio

October 16, 2013 - 9:22 am
Page 1 of 2  Next ->   View as Single Page

Supposing that the federal government eventually gets Healthcare.gov to work, many Democrats believe that Obamacare will eventually become popular. While some Americans will come to depend on Obamacare and its subsidies, driving up dependence on government and solidifying more Democrat votes, their signature law will always be a divisive, controversial law.

obama-reid-pelosi1. No Republicans or independents voted for it or had any input into it. Obamacare is a Democrat law designed to impose Democrat goals. Republicans and independents have no stake in seeing it succeed, and Democrats respond to their objections with insults — you’re racist for opposing it, or you love X more than you love America for opposing it. That won’t win anyone over. Because Obamacare imposes offensive, wrongheaded and damaging policies, millions of Americans have a stake in seeing it fail. Democrats tend to respond by noting that the conservative Heritage Foundation once supported something similar to Obamacare, and Republican Gov. Mitt Romney enacted something similar to it in Massachusetts. Fair enough, but the Heritage Foundation is an idea factory and has since repudiated its support for Obamacare-style mandates. Romney governed a blue state and got the best deal he could get from its overwhelmingly Democratic legislature. What’s enacted in Massachusetts is not necessarily right for Oklahoma or Florida or Texas. Democrats’ response: It’s the law now, so deal with it. They don’t apply that logic to the Second Amendment, and no one is under any obligation to simply accept Obamacare just because it’s currently the law. Laws are changed and repealed all the time. That’s why we send representatives to Washington and to our state capitals.

secret2. Democrats crafted it in secret and bought the votes they needed to get it through Congress. Barack Obama promised to deliver the most transparent administration in American history, but on his signature law, he not only failed, he practically demanded that the law was built in secret. The “Louisiana Purchase” of Sen. Mary Landrieu’s vote and the “Cornhusker Kickback” to buy Sen. Ben Nelson’s vote will forever tarnish Obamacare as a corrupt bargain.

 

 

 

3. It doesn’t actually help Americans buy insurance by making it more affordable. It just orders us to buy insurance or face the IRS. It orders employers to provide coverage for their employees or face the IRS. The IRS is the most feared, and one of the least trusted, government agencies, and Obamacare jams it into our most personal decisions. Obamacare’s implementation has also been fundamentally unfair: Democrat allies got exemptions that the rest of us couldn’t get. The math just doesn’t work for Obamacare to make insurance cheaper. By forcing companies to take on new risk and not allowing them to charge more for assuming that risk, Obamacare forces them to charge more — a lot more — to everyone. Many individuals and families will find their work hours cut so their employer can avoid Obamacare’s mandates, while their insurance prices will go up. Less income plus higher costs will condemn many Americans to a poorer standard of living. The government’s answer is to subsidize some of them, but that money has to come from somewhere. Some Americans’ taxes will increase to pay for other Americans’ subsidies. This will drag and distort the economy in ways not even fully understood yet.

fetus_development_in_fifth_month_hffpn4. Abortion is controversial. Obamacare makes Americans who oppose abortion pay for abortions. Millions of abortions. Obamacare sidesteps the Hyde Amendment and subsidizes about 115,000 abortions per year according to some estimates. Forcing Americans who object to abortion to pay for abortion will never stop being controversial. Ever. It just won’t. As a pro-life American myself, I hate Obamacare as much for its social policy as for its economic policy and for its robbing us of our rights. It’s the trifecta of awful policy.

 

 

 

5. The majority of Americans objected to Obamacare when the Democrats passed it, but they passed it anyway. Democrats’ response: Call people names and pass the bill to spite them. They now defend the law partly out of spite, using lines like “if you don’t like Obamacare you must want people to die!” The law is now a talisman on the left and a grave offense in the center and on the right.

Comments are closed.

Top Rated Comments   
"What’s enacted in Massachusetts is not necessarily right for Oklahoma or Florida or Texas." Historically, what's enacted in Taxachussetts for sixty years now isn't even right for Taxachussetts.
All of your points are valid. Even "pro-choice" people like me, those who want to keep abortion out of legislation, may well be opposed to forcing anyone to facilitate abortion. And the loss of liberty is far more important than any other element of DemBamaCare.
26 weeks ago
26 weeks ago Link To Comment
All Comments   (13)
All Comments   (13)
Sort: Newest Oldest Top Rated
my buddy's step-sister makes $67 an hour on the internet. She has been laid off for nine months but last month her payment was $19148 just working on the internet for a few hours. her comment is here....... WWW.Rush64.COM
26 weeks ago
26 weeks ago Link To Comment
Let me get this straight....

We're going to be "gifted" with a health care plan we are forced to purchase and fined if we don't, which purportedly covers at least 10 million more people, without adding a single new doctor, but provides for 16,000 new IRS agents, who have recently demonstrated their objective and professional integrity; written by a committee whose chairman says he doesn't understand it, passed by a Congress that didn't read it but exempted themselves from it, and signed by a President who smokes, with funding administered by a treasury chief who didn't pay his taxes, for which we'll be taxed for four years before any benefits take effect, by a government which has already bankrupted Social Security and Medicare, Fannie Mae and Freddy Mac, and the Post Office all to be overseen by a surgeon general who is obese, and financed by a country that's broke!!!!!

'What could possibly go wrong?'
26 weeks ago
26 weeks ago Link To Comment
my roomate's sister-in-law makes $75 every hour on the laptop. She has been out of work for 6 months but last month her paycheck was $20467 just working on the laptop for a few hours. >>>>>>>> WWW.JOBS60.ℂOM
26 weeks ago
26 weeks ago Link To Comment
"Taxachusettes" is being forced to raise taxes to pay for Romneycare. Remember "Economics 101': raising demand without increasing supply results in higher prices. In order to meet these higher prices, taxes must be raised to compensate. Plus we still haven't solved the supposed "shortage" of primary care doctors on which both Romneycare and Obamacare depend. The result is Canadian level waiting times to see a doctor. The fact that you now have "insurance" doesn't mean that you will be able to get health care. Not if there is no doctor available to provide it.
26 weeks ago
26 weeks ago Link To Comment
A solution that costs not one cent is to repeal the laws and regulations that make US health care so expensive. For example, without prescription laws people would be able to take care of their basic health care needs without visiting a doctor. Back in 1938 before the passage of prescription laws they could do exactly this! The costy of controlling blood pressure, high cholesterol, non-insulin dependent high blood sugar can all be controlled by medicinies sold at Walmart for $10 for a 90 day supply. A daily full strength coated aspirin tabel will "keep the doctor away" better than anything else. Unlike Democrats and unfortunately Republicans, Libertarians do not worship "big government". For more information see my blog at "muskegonlibertarian.wordpress.com";.
26 weeks ago
26 weeks ago Link To Comment
You missed one! No person signing up and seeking a subsidy will EVER be dropped for non-payment of premium.
Who would dare drop a black, Mexican, union member or tinkerbell just because he/she/it couldn't pay another premium? And, that, of course, is where the destructive cost of this ill conceived program will come from.
26 weeks ago
26 weeks ago Link To Comment
Again with that "single payer" boogeyman! Prior to the Great Meltdown of 2008, the OECD released a report stating that various countries with national health services (the UK, France, a few others) were going to have to cut services to the bone AND massively raise taxes, just to stay afloat. Not either/or, BOTH-cut services while still raising taxes.

This country is worse than broke, it is rapidly reaching the point it will not even be able to pay the interest on the national debt, AND it's likely the USD will lose world reserve currency status...And yet, WE'RE going to get single payer, when apparently neither the UK nor France can do so in a manner that is sustainable?

The whole point of the ACA was 1. Establish that we're all state property and can be commanded to purchase goods at bureaucrat behest at the point of a gun and 2.Reparations. SOME Americans will work two or more under 30 hours a week jobs, none of which will offer insurance , *IF* they can find these jobs, AND they will make too much to be subsidized for under $100 a month obamacare...But they will be taxed enough to pay to subsidize OTHER Americans. Still others (the ones with better paying careers rather than jobs) will pay $700-800-who knows how much for insurance that will be crappy compared to what they have know-and again, be taxed to pay for others' insurance. And the "lucky" ones with obamacare fully subsidized? They're expecting BC/BS level plans and will be lucky if they get VA level plans. The "lucky" ones will be disproportionally black and Hispanic; the unlucky ones white and Asian, and some "Uncle Toms/Tio Tacos" (to use the sensitive phrasing of the left) who deserve to suffer for 'acting white" and besides, 'you can't make an omelet' etc etc etc.

Basically, the Personal mandate creates such misery and so much bureaucratic power that why would anyone in power WANT to discontinue it in favor of single payer?
26 weeks ago
26 weeks ago Link To Comment
"Democrats tend to respond by noting that the conservative Heritage Foundation once supported something similar to Obamacare, and Republican Gov. Mitt Romney enacted something similar to it in Massachusetts. Fair enough, but the Heritage Foundation is an idea factory and has since repudiated its support for Obamacare-style mandates. Romney governed a blue state and got the best deal he could get from its overwhelmingly Democratic legislature. What’s enacted in Massachusetts is not necessarily right for Oklahoma or Florida or Texas."

The intellectual dishonesty here is just astonishing.

The Heritage Foundation promulgated something not "similar," but IDENTICAL to Obamacare in response to Hillary-Care in the early years of the Clinton Administration. The Heritage Foundation's plan, with the individual mandate its centerpiece, was supported by a solid majority of Congressional Republicans. Bob Dole supported it as one of his campaign planks in 1996. Mitt Romney signed it into law in Massachussets with absolutely no opposition from National Republicans (as governor, Romney could have vetoed it, but did not). Romney said not one single word in opposition to it during the debate about it. Obama was opposed to the idea of individual mandate and made speaches against it in the Illinois assembly.

Both sides merely switched sides in a craven display of intellectual dishonesty upon the election of Obama.

I am proud to say that in 2012 and 2008, that I did not watch one single political commercial, nor will I ever reconnect my cable TV. EVER!
26 weeks ago
26 weeks ago Link To Comment
That makes me sad. RIP Bonnie Doon Ice Cream, I knew you well.
26 weeks ago
26 weeks ago Link To Comment
And people wonder why in these conversations why some Texan always half-jokingly (only half-joking) brings up secession. It is because lots of crazy busybodies want to meddle.
26 weeks ago
26 weeks ago Link To Comment
I'm not joking, half- or otherwise. I am all for Texas telling the U.S. FedGov to sod off.

Rusty Bill
San Antonio
26 weeks ago
26 weeks ago Link To Comment
1 2 Next View All