Get PJ Media on your Apple

The PJ Tatler

by
Bridget Johnson

Bio

June 20, 2013 - 5:39 am

After “a great deal of thought” since visiting Guantanamo on June 7, Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) wrote Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel to urge him to put in place “the most humane policies possible” and stop feeding the prisoners.

“I write to express to you my concerns and opposition to the force-feeding of detainees, not for reasons of medical necessity but as a matter of policy that stands in conflict with international norms,” the chairwoman of the Senate Intelligence Committee wrote.

“During our visit, more than 60 percent of the 166 detainees held at Guantanamo Bay were categorized by the Department of Defense as ‘hunger strikers,’ with more than 40 of them being force-fed. Four detainees were in the facility’s hospital for problems related to their feeding or hunger strike,” she continued. “During our visit to the prison, we were briefed on the Department of Defense policies regarding force-feedings and I remain concerned that these policies are out of step with international norms, medical ethics and practices of the U.S. Bureau of Prisons.”

Feinstein noted the International Committee of the Red Cross, World Medical Association, Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, the United Nations Working Group on Arbitrary Detention, and three UN Special Rapporteurs have opposed the force-feeding of the Gitmo hunger strikers.

“The WMA recently stated that ‘[f]orcible feeding is never ethically acceptable,” and “that physicians should never be used to break hunger strikes through acts such as force-feeding.’ The American Medical Association has supported the WMA’s position on this matter,” she added.

“In addition to the allegation that the Department of Defense’s force-feeding practices are out of sync with international norms, they also appear to deviate significantly from U.S. Bureau of Prison practices. Based on a review by Intelligence Committee staff, the significant differences between force-feedings at Guantanamo Bay and within the U.S. Bureau of Prisons relate to the manner in which detainees are force-fed, how often detainees are force-fed, and the safeguards and oversight in place during force-feedings.”

Detainees on hunger strike are being fed twice a day. “The visual impression is one of restraint: of arms, legs, and body,” Feinstein said.

Unlike Bureau of Prisons procedures, she added, inmates aren’t assessed for individual needs or videotaped during force-feeding at Gitmo.

“Hunger strikes are a long known form of non-violent protest aimed at bringing attention to a cause, rather than an attempt of suicide. I believe that the current approach raises very important ethical questions and complicates the difficult situation regarding the continued indefinite detention at Guantanamo,” Feinstein concluded. “I urge you to reevaluate the force-feeding policies at Guantanamo Bay and to put in place the most humane policies possible.”

Bridget Johnson is a career journalist whose news articles and opinion columns have run in dozens of news outlets across the globe. Bridget first came to Washington to be online editor at The Hill, where she wrote The World from The Hill column on foreign policy. Previously she was an opinion writer and editorial board member at the Rocky Mountain News and nation/world news columnist at the Los Angeles Daily News. She has contributed to USA Today, The Wall Street Journal, National Review Online, Politico and more, and has myriad television and radio credits as a commentator. Bridget is Washington Editor for PJ Media.

Comments are closed.

All Comments   (9)
All Comments   (9)
Sort: Newest Oldest Top Rated
Forgive me, but for once, I agree with DiFi. If these men do not want to eat, that should be their decision. Let them starve themselves to death if that's what they want.

But I would make it clear to them that when they die, their bodies will be buried with pig carcasses; no virgins for them!
44 weeks ago
44 weeks ago Link To Comment
we have a duty to provide food to prisoners. we do not have a duty to feed them. let them starve if they choose.

btw, i'd feed 'em pork.
44 weeks ago
44 weeks ago Link To Comment
Lets examine the premise of feeding them pork. Moslems aren't allowed to eat pork, so it would follow that they've never tasted it. How exactly would they know if we feed them pork?
44 weeks ago
44 weeks ago Link To Comment
How about we tell them.
44 weeks ago
44 weeks ago Link To Comment
Gitmo is still open? I thought that the Prez said it would be closed within a year of the election. It was in all the papers. What happened?

44 weeks ago
44 weeks ago Link To Comment
He lied. He can do that. He's the Annointed One.
44 weeks ago
44 weeks ago Link To Comment
Never thought I'd agree with DiFi, but on this point she's right, let them starve. As with any form of protest, if it accomplishes nothing, people will stop using it as a method of protest.

If they want to starve to death, let them.
44 weeks ago
44 weeks ago Link To Comment
Yes, lets stop forcefedding them. Why keep these guys alive at all if you're never gonna let them go anyway.

Shoot them. March them to the back of the compound and put a bullet in the back of their heads. If you're squemish about it, call me. I know lots of guys - including me - who will do it.
44 weeks ago
44 weeks ago Link To Comment
Never thought I would agree with anything Feinstein said, but I do on this. Let the savages starve themselves to death. I will be one less murderous savage in the world. As Sarah Palin said. "Let Allah sort it out"!
44 weeks ago
44 weeks ago Link To Comment
View All