Get PJ Media on your Apple

The PJ Tatler

by
Rick Moran

Bio

April 7, 2013 - 7:33 am

Kim Jong-Un’s gambit to extract money to keep his dictatorship afloat is going to work. Despite it being pointed out many times since the crisis began that there was nothing much new in Kim’s creation of a crisis in order to force the big powers back to the negotiating table, the U.S. is eagerly looking to do exactly that.

The cancellation of a missile test here in the U.S. — ostensibly to prevent Kim from getting the wrong idea about U.S. intentions — might be considered prudent under the circumstances. Whether Kim is pretending to be crazy or actually is off his nut hardly matters when you’re looking at someone who might take anything as a provocation and respond militarily.

But the administration has all but announced its capitulation to Kim’s belligerence, as Secretary of State John Kerry heads to Asia next week.

CNN:

Meanwhile, U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry will visit Asia next week where he is expected to discuss potential diplomatic incentives for North Korea once it stops its threatening rhetoric, senior administration officials told CNN on condition of anonymity.

“Secretary Kerry agrees that we have to have a robust deterrent because we really don’t’ know what these guys will do,” said one senior official, who was not authorized to speak on the issue.

“But he also knows that the North Koreans need a diplomatic off-ramp and that they have to be able to see it.”

A “diplomatic off-ramp”? In other words, a bribe.

The Christian Science Monitor fleshes this concept out:

After sending nuclear-capable B-52s to the skies and antimissile ships to the waters around the Korean Peninsula, as well as missile-defense batteries to Alaska and Guam, the Obama administration is now moving to ratchet down the tensions.

The aim of Secretary Kerry’s Asia trip will be to reassure allies and partners that the US, after having taken necessary military precautions, is focused on finding the diplomatic steps – both short-term and further into the future – to address the nuclear-armed North’s belligerence.

“While recent US actions have shored up the concerns of our allies and moved to protect the US from potential attack, now is the time for reinforcing as well the diplomatic and economic measures that will stifle North Korean behavior and force a reset on their part,” says George Lopez, a former United Nations sanctions monitor on the North Korea case.

What would some of these “diplomatic and economic measures” be?

CNN Security Clearance blog:

Kerry left Saturday for the Middle East and then for London before traveling to Seoul, Bejing and Tokyo later next week.

The shape of a possible eventual deal, the sources said, is likely to take the form of previous attempts at satisfying what the United States sees as North Korea’s ultimate goal of survival, which could include security guarantees, a road map to a peace treaty and a lifting of sanctions.

North Korea wants all three of these elements as part of any potential agreement with the United States.

“It’s really old wine in a new bottle,” one official said. “We have 30 plus statements, offers and positions we have put on the table over the last several years.”

Earlier this week, the United States attempted to reduce friction with Pyongyang by emphasizing a return to diplomacy, recognizing that its announcements of American military deployments in response to belligerent statements by North Korea may have contributed to escalating tensions between the two countries.

“The U.S. is not matching their rhetoric,” notes Joe Cirincione, a former adviser to President Barack Obama on nuclear issues who now serves as president of the Ploughshares Fund, which works against the spread of nuclear weapons. “They are not pouring gasoline on the fire.”

Cirincione argues North Korean leader Kim Jong Un may be ready to calm the situation with the United States and South Korea, having achieved his goals of solidifying his position with the North Korean people and military and increasing his bargaining position with South Korea and the United States.

“You are starting to see this tamp down and I suspect after a decent interval you might be able to restart talks directly with the North,” he said.

Much more on the next page.
Like a two year old who has thrown a tantrum and got his exhausted parents to given in, Kim will reap the benefits of his brinksmanship. The cave-in by the U.S. could also embolden the young man to go even farther next time, testing the limits of American appeasement with even more bellicosity and outrageous behavior.

The metaphor of Charlie Brown, the football, and Lucy comes to mind. Lucy, while seemingly crazy for doing the same thing over and over, makes a rational choice to pull the football back while Charlie Brown holds out hope that this time will be different. Despite severe reservations on his part, Charlie Brown always talks himself into playing the game with Lucy.

Would that U.S. policy makers refuse to play Kim’s game next time.

Rick Moran is PJ Media's Chicago editor and Blog editor at The American Thinker. He is also host of the"RINO Hour of Power" on Blog Talk Radio. His own blog is Right Wing Nut House.

Comments are closed.

All Comments   (7)
All Comments   (7)
Sort: Newest Oldest Top Rated
To all appearances, our enemies are getting a real good idea of what our assets and methodologies are for protecting the US. Our North Korean 'friends' are simply surrogates for the Chinese (and, quite possibly, the Russians). They have their measure of Obama and his cohorts and they are beginning to sharpen their knives, so to speak.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
Stop cow towing to these little idiots in North Korea, for 60 years it has not worked, just how long does it take for us to get the message. They want war? I say give it to them with one big nuke that will end this madness. I know that sounds like crazy talk but after everything they have gone against, every agreement they sign, they cannot be trusted, eliminate them. We would be doing China a favor by doing so, they will do nothing if we did that.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
Does anyone really think ol' "I Chow Down" will launch a nuke? Besides, the Chinese are NOT his friend. I honestly believe they would just as soon see the fat bastard gone into exile or dead.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
I am so relieved that we canceled a missile test to avoid being provocative.

We wouldn't want to be provocative.

But you know, sometimes I want to play by THEIR rules.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
For forty years North Korea has conducted successful operations against the South, some resulting in deaths, that apparently most on here are unawre of. Six times They have outright denounced the Armistice.

To claim cowardice, incompetence, weakness, etc., of this administrations handling of the latest event is to make an 'equal' claim against all the preceeding administrations since the armistice agreement was finalized.

You can always tell who has never served in war by the comments they make and suggest that the solution is always to go to war. North Korea is not some isolated island far away from millions of people consolidated in a small space nor is it isolated from China. If you want to go to war, consider Iran where a great deal of geoploitical accomplishment could be gained.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
The only correct response to the Norks' behavior is to decapitate the regime. The U.S. won't do it -- even if we had an actual American in the White House, we're worn out by our Middle Eastern adventures -- and Russia won't do it -- their problems are about as intense as ours. Perhaps the Chinese will find it worth their while. But under no circumstances should we REWARD the saber-rattling of the world's most repressive regime.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
You get the behavior you reward.

Americans rewarded incompetence, weakness and fear...and we now have that as our leadership.

Our foreign policy toward North Korea rewards the biggest tantrum.

Post hoc ergo propter hoc is not ALWAYS a fallacy. It stops being one when the result obtained is the same each time.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
View All