Get PJ Media on your Apple

The PJ Tatler

Stephen Kruiser


February 26, 2013 - 12:10 am

Math is hard.

We should try to define austerity. In its latest budget document, the CBO notes in table 1-1 (look at outlays) that, assuming sequestration happens, there will be a slight dip from 2012 to 2013 in discretionary spending levels. Then discretionary spending rises every year through 2023. Total federal spending is projected to rise from $3.5 trillion in 2012 to $5.9 trillion in 2023. Good luck matching that sort of austerity in your salary gains over the next decade.

This is not unlike the old “But the Republicans want to CUT MEDICARE!” ruse that’s been going on for two decades. A “reduction in the rate of growth” becomes a “cut” to keep the GOP bogeyman story alive. It’s a pretty simple thing to explain, we just never seem to elect anyone capable of doing so.

Stephen Kruiser is a professional comedian and writer who has also been a conservative political activist for over two decades. A co-founder of the first Los Angeles Tea Party, Kruiser often speaks to grassroots groups around America and has had the great honor of traveling around the world entertaining U.S. troops.

Comments are closed.

All Comments   (1)
All Comments   (1)
Sort: Newest Oldest Top Rated
I like the new idea of a 2% cut in all federal employee salaries to pick up the slack of the sequestration. The federal employees would only reject it if they're GREEEEEEEE-DY.
2 years ago
2 years ago Link To Comment
View All

One Trackback to “About Those Sequestration ‘Cuts’ And ‘Austerity’…”