Americans aren’t safe in Egypt, but that’s no reason we shouldn’t shovel money their way, right?
Wait one. Representative Kay Granger (R-TX), chairwoman of the Appropriations subcommittee on foreign operations, has put her foot down and blocked $450 million in aid to the Egyptian government.
“This proposal comes to Congress at a point when the US-Egypt relationship has never been under more scrutiny, and rightly so,” the chairwoman of the Appropriations subcommittee on foreign operations Rep. Kay Granger, R-Texas, said in a statement. “I am not convinced of the urgent need for this assistance and I cannot support it at this time. … I have placed a hold on these funds.”
The relationship between the United States and Egypt has been rocky since the overthrow of US ally President Hosni Mubarak last year. The Egyptian government angered Washington when it cracked down on numerous democracy advocates and groups, including three US-funded nongovernmental organizations, earlier this year.
More recently, demonstrators breached the US Embassy in Cairo to protest an anti-Islam video, and some in Congress have called for cutting off aid. The United States provides Egypt with $1.55 billion annually — $250 million in economic aid and $1.3 billion in military aid.
The question that should concern Congress is does economic and military aid help keep the peace between Israel and Egypt? One might normally see the Egyptian military as a restraining influence on the Muslim Brotherhood government headed up by Mohammad Morsi. But Morsi has purged the Egyptian army of most of the pro-Western, anti-Islamist officers, leaving the US with a critical decision; do we continue to back a regime that has as it’s number one foreign policy goal the destruction of Israel?
PJ Media columnist David Goldman (AKA Spengler) “Egypt is an Adversary, Not a Neutral”:
The Obama administration has presided over a collapse of a system of alliances which sustained America’s position in the region for sixty years. And if you want to know what’s happening, ignore the self-consoling spin in the mainstream media, and listen to what our adversaries are saying. They have the ball.
The $450 million was intended to bail out the Egyptian economy, which, as Goldman points out, is a basket case. Is this wise? Would it be better for the Egyptian economy to collapse with the blame placed on the Muslim Brotherhood government?
This strategy would presuppose that the Brotherhood would allow free elections where there was a possibility that they would be voted out. Even if you believe that, we might get something worse. The Salafis are the second largest party in Egypt and have clashed with the Muslim Brotherhood on the issue of how fast to remake Egypt by implementing full Sharia law.
The block placed on the economic aid by Rep. Granger is probably temporary. The State Department is already negotiating with Congress to have the funds released. But last December, Congress made aid to Egypt conditional on whether the government “is supporting the transition to civilian government including holding free and fair elections; implementing policies to protect freedom of expression, association and religion and due process of law.”
Egypt may have a civilian government, but it certainly not implementing policies “to protect freedom of expression, association and religion and due process of law.” On that basis alone, Congress can and should deny Egypt the cash, even though it’s already been appropriated. Recent events demand that before any aid from the US is forthcoming, Egypt show by its actions that it is a partner for peace and not a deadly threat to Israel and US interests in the region.






Good on her. Part of the solution to defeating the leftists is makng them actually lay down markers when they want something. In the past they would have just have had the MSM portray Granger poorly and hope the intimidation factor served as a deterrant and caused a collapse in support.
You give into the implied threat of the MSM making you look bad you will lose in the long run, as you are defeated via a thousand small cuts. Stand firm when you have a good case to make. Maybe you win, maybe you lose–but make *them* lay down a marker. Don’t allow them easy scores any more. When everything goes to pot we cash in the markers. If it doesn’t go to pot, we have still sharpened ideas via rigorous debate (It is a democracy, after all). Win-win.
And who knows–there could be a preference cascade just waiting around for the right conditions in order to occur. Give it those conditions–part of which is saying the Emperor has no clothes when it is clear many will think he doesn’t.
bail out the Egyptian economy?………….what is the definition of insanity again?
Just as shoveling money at Greece’s economy, the now QE3 at the USA’s economy doesnt work……….but the left thinks it can kick the can down the road to the next admin with 450 now…..
….and we all know, all they will be really doing is funding the Muslim Brthd or maybe even Al Queda’ or Hama’s, take your pick
….Question: why is there only one in the GOP willing to stand up and block this?
Hooray for Kay Granger. This is fantastic. Why on earth do we keep giving non-allies money? That was the President’s description, “not an ally”.
I thought Hillary Clinton was smarter than to get caught up in Obama’s unusual view of America and America’s interests. Perhaps not. Take the checkbook away from both of these critters.
Think of it this way, Obama, how many “Obama phones” could you buy with $450 million? The election’s pretty close. (sarc off)
The $450 million was intended to bail out the Egyptian economy, which, as Goldman points out, is a basket case.
Why would anybody believe that the $450mm will help the Egyptian economy? Money sent to corrupt kleptocracies winds up in the hands of the kleptocrats, does it not? How much has been sent to the Palestinians, and what does their economy look like?
And since when is it the burden of the US taxpayer to subsidize backward third-world theocracies?