“Sources familiar with the matter” are telling the president’s secrets again. According to a Reuters story written by Mark Hosenball, some things that were supposed to be secret are no longer so.
Obama authorizes secret support for Syrian rebels
See?
(Reuters) – President Barack Obama has signed a secret order authorizing U.S. support for rebels seeking to depose Syrian President Bashar al-Assad and his government, sources familiar with the matter said.
Obama’s order, approved earlier this year and known as an intelligence “finding,” broadly permits the CIA and other U.S. agencies to provide support that could help the rebels oust Assad.
This and other developments signal a shift toward growing, albeit still circumscribed, support for Assad’s armed opponents – a shift that intensified following last month’s failure of the U.N. Security Council to agree on tougher sanctions against the Damascus government.
The White House is for now apparently stopping short of giving the rebels lethal weapons, even as some U.S. allies do just that.
Here are some more secrets that are no longer secret.
A U.S. government source acknowledged that under provisions of the presidential finding, the United States was collaborating with a secret command center operated by Turkey and its allies.
Last week, Reuters reported that, along with Saudi Arabia and Qatar, Turkey had established a secret base near the Syrian border to help direct vital military and communications support to Assad’s opponents.
This “nerve center” is in Adana, a city in southern Turkey about 60 miles from the Syrian border, which is also home to Incirlik, a U.S. air base where U.S. military and intelligence agencies maintain a substantial presence.
Turkey’s moderate Islamist government has been demanding Assad’s departure with growing vehemence. Turkish authorities are said by current and former U.S. government officials to be increasingly involved in providing Syrian rebels with training and possibly equipment.
A secret base, no longer secret, directing a secret war that is no longer secret.
But wait, there’s more! This stuff isn’t supposed to be secret, but could give US tech secrets to al Qaeda.
Separately from the president’s secret order, the Obama administration has stated publicly that it is providing some backing for Assad’s opponents.
The State Department said on Wednesday the U.S. government had set aside a total of $25 million for “non-lethal” assistance to the Syrian opposition. A U.S. official said that was mostly for communications equipment, including encrypted radios.
The State Department also says the United States has set aside $64 million in humanitarian assistance for the Syrian people, including contributions to the World Food Program, the International Committee of the Red Cross and other aid agencies.
Also on Wednesday, the U.S. Treasury confirmed it had granted authorization to the Syrian Support Group, Washington representative of one of the most active rebel factions, the Free Syrian Army, to conduct financial transactions on the rebel group’s behalf. The authorization was first reported on Friday by Al-Monitor, a Middle East news and commentary website.
Al Qaeda is becoming the spine of the Syrian opposition. Anything we give that opposition is bound to fall in al Qaeda’s hands. So by all means, lets give them our radios and our MANPAD weapons and other secret stuff. What can go wrong?






Not really a leak of anything top secret, we have known that the US is supporting the Syrian Islamist rebels despite the public silence for a while now. This is just more public confirmation that yes, radical Islam, you are supported by the government of the United States.
Thanks for not blowing smoke in our eyes and for mentioning this. Certain websites say a whole bunch of other stuff in order to intentionally obscure the obvious and most illuminating part of the story. Things that make you go hmmm. I haven’t figured out why, but I wonder if it relates to a previous popular analysis of an Obama E.O. power grab that not once mentioned the word Constitution or constitutional in the post? It was so odd that it stuck out as intentional avoidance. Imagine doing an analysis of a gun-grabbing move by politicians where you neglect to consider the whole Second Amendment argument. That wouldn’t be an actual analysis of the issue at all now, would it?
Just because our mystery naked emperor tries to grab illegitimate power, block our speech, neuter both our personal and national defenses while he arms both international terrorists and local terroristic drug gangs to fundamentally transform the governments of a few key nations doesn’t mean we have to notice and assign meaning to it all. If a tree falls in a forest, does anyone see it online? No, a “responsible blogger” can assume that trees are no longer falling in forests if the Obama Administration says he supports the trees and has addressed the false rumor wIth a truth squad.
Imagine a future post about Internet censorship and fairness doctrine where our freedom of speech or the replacement of it with government sharia isn’t even addressed. That will happen one day, so prepare to ask yourself why that is.