Christian Adams has reported on the ridiculous 18-year old witness presented on Wednesday by DOJ in the Texas voter ID trial who said her parents were too busy to take her to get an ID – but she had plenty of time to travel to the airport in San Antonio and then fly to Washington at taxpayer expense to testify in the trial. Rodriquez also said that she did not have a driver’s license because of the cost of auto insurance, apparently unaware that she can get a free, nondriver’s license photo ID from the Texas DMV.
But DOJ was also embarrassed on Wednesday when Texas Sen. Rodney Ellis was put up as a witness by the Justice Department to rail against the voter ID law. When he was cross-examined by Texas, he had to admit that both his wife and daughter, who were listed by DOJ’s “experts” as supposedly not having driver’s licenses, in fact, do have Texas driver’s licenses. And in a comment on how inaccurate DOJ’s racial data is, Ellis sounded offended that DOJ’s experts listed his wife and daughter as white. Ellis and his family are black Texans.
Just how exactly did Rodriquez get on a plain without showing government issued ID?
Good question. Since she’s 18, I was under the impression that a form of ID is required at that point.
Funny thing, the Constitution also gives me the right to keep and bear arms. Doesn’t that mean that it’s equally unreasonable to require me to present a photo id and submit a background check to legally purchase a firearm.
Isn’t it equally unconstitutional to restrict the purchase of ALL firearms in any way?
Obama is using his DOJ to support voter fraud in his attempt to get reelected. We have had voter ID in Ohio for decades without any problems.