Matthew Boyle at Daily Caller covers Eric Holder’s nutty explanation of why Fast and Furious is such a scandal – Holder says the controversy surrounding him is because of his skin color.
Holder has crossed a line that must have the political people at the White House climbing the walls. The only thing that could make the Fast and Furious scandal worse than it already is would be for Eric Holder to say he is so controversial because he is black. Of course none of this should surprise anyone who read my book Injustice. The book opens with rotted racialist views that Holder holds near and dear, very near. It describes a clipping Eric Holder carried in his wallet for decades – a clipping from Harlem preacher Samuel Proctor. From Injustice:
For much of his life, Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. carried around something peculiar. While most people keep cash, family photos, and credit cards in their wallets, Holder revealed to a reporter in 1996 that he keeps with him an old clipping of a quote from Harlem preacher Reverend Samuel D. Proctor. Holder put the clipping in his wallet in 1971, when he was studying history at Columbia University, and kept it in wallet after wallet over the ensuing decades.
What were Proctor’s words that Holder found so compelling?
“Blackness is another issue entirely apart from class in America. No matter how affluent, educated and mobile [a black person] becomes, his race defines him more particularly than anything else. Black people have a common cause that requires attending to, and this cause does not allow for the rigid class separation that is the luxury of American whites. There is a sense in which every black man is as far from liberation as the weakest one if his weakness is attributable to racial injustice.”
When asked to explain the passage, Holder replied, “It really says that … I am not the tall U.S. attorney, I am not the thin United States Attorney. I am the black United States attorney. And he was saying that no matter how successful you are, there’s a common cause that bonds the black United States attorney with the black criminal or the black doctor with the black homeless person.”
What is surprising that Charlie Savage even published Holder’s racialist gripe at the New York Times. Two possibilities. Savage is so in the tank for the administration, something the same article reveals on other points, that he simply did not recognize the volcanic nature of the complaint. Savage perhaps agrees with it. The second possibility is that Holder is performing his best Marc Antony act (the Roman, not the singer) and giving himself up as gone. Nothing stokes the base like a progressive who met his demise because of the perceived evil racial motivation of his enemies. The two possibilities are not mutually exclusive.