Get PJ Media on your Apple

Ron Radosh

Leave it to Salman Rushdie to bring back the Left’s favorite stratagem: moral equivalence. During the Cold War, leftists used to say the following: “Sure, the Soviets are doing bad things, but so is the United States.” Those a bit more to the left would advance the argument, and say: “The Soviets do terrible things, but the U.S. is responsible, since its leaders view them, as Reagan did, as ‘the evil empire.’ Since we won’t accommodate their just demands, they have to respond to us with hostility.” Those even further to the left would push the analogy even further, arguing: “The Soviets may do some bad things, but at least they stand on the side of progressive change. The U.S., on the other hand, oppresses Third World peoples and supports right-wing reactionary regimes all over the world.”

A good example of the old moral equivalence was to equate the Gulag in the Soviet Union, in which hundreds of thousands were imprisoned, starved to death and executed in massive frame-ups, with McCarthyism in the United States. During the so-called McCarthy era, relatively few were imprisoned or lost their livelihoods, and many actually guilty of being actual Soviet agents portrayed themselves as innocents accused because of their political views. Yet the Left in America argued both were the same.

Now Salman Rushdie has a lot to be wary of. After the Iranian revolution, the late Ayatollah Khomeini issued a fatwa along with a reward for anyone who murdered him. Because of his novel The Satanic Verses, Rushdie had to go into hiding in different safe houses for a number of years, while under the protection of the British government. Intellectuals and writers in the West rallied to his defense. Eventually, Rushdie came into the open, moved to the United States, and became a favorite in the celebrity world, as well as a best-selling novelist.

Comments are closed.

All Comments   (2)
All Comments   (2)
Sort: Newest Oldest Top Rated
As for the knee jerk need to find a moral equivalence between US and its enemies, Martin Amis wrote eloquently about it here:

""We are drowsily accustomed, by now, to the fetishization of "balance,"
the ground rule of "moral equivalence" in all conflicts between West and
East, the 100 percent and 360-degree inability to pass judgment on any
ethnicity other than our own (except in the case of Israel)."

Martin Amis,, The Second Plane, September 11: Terror and Boredom_ (2008)
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
The incident of the rock throwing professor did not take place on a " trip to the West Bank during the first intifada" but rather, on the Israeli-Lebanese border AFTER Israel withdrew from south Lebanon in 2000, in accordance with UN Security Council Resolution 425, passed in 1978.

Here is a relatively impartial account of the incident, including Said's craven justifications for what was symbolically if not practically, a violent act:

And here is an image of the elegant rock thrower in the act:
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
View All