I’m serious. I’d vote for him, if I could. Isn’t he a more vibrant leader than anybody running in our election? Let’s be honest. And now he has the cojones to suspend relations with Syria over the Baathist’s interference in the Lebanese election. Okay, even if we can’t elect Sarkozy, we should elect the person best able to work with him, because he is so much more creative and fearless than any of our politicians. Still skeptical? … There’s more… I ask you … who has better taste in women – Bill Clinton or Nicolas Sarkozy?
Can we have Sarkozy and let Bill Clinton be President of France? Clinton would probably make a pretty decenet French president, actually. He’s be a hell of a lot better than Chirac.
But I kinda like Sarkozy right where he is.
Why not trade Hillary for Sarkozy? She adopted New York rather easily, surely she can adapt to France. Her speeches in French can’t be any worse, any more shrill and listless, than her speeches in English. And Bill could assume the role of consort, at which he’d be splendid.
If we’re going to indulge in this sort of fantasy, why limit ourselves to the Clintons?
Wave the magic wand and send the whole lot of them to Belgium, capitol of the great and wonderful EU. Where they will fit in very well.
Obviously everyone that has posted has missed Roger’s point.
Yikes… I vote for Sarkozy over Bill…
You’re making us convert centimeters to inches for the vital statistics?
Too much work, but I’ll do it.