Roger’s Rules

By Roger Kimball

Bio

Get Updates From Roger Kimball

When it comes to the National Endowment for the Arts, it turns out that those are not mutually exclusive possibilities. Back in the 1980s, when the word “transgressive” finally entered the lexicon of critical assessment as a term of praise, the NEA was the subject of fierce criticism when it transpired that some of their money — that is, some of your money — was going to support such “transgressive artists” (that’s “perverted weirdos” in plain English) as Robert Mapplethorpe, Andreas Serrano, Karen Finley, and Annie Sprinkle.

When Dana Gioia became chairmen of the NEA, he endeavored mightily to change all that. Mapplethorpe was out, Shakespeare was in.

But Dana is gone now. His seat is hardly cold, but back come the weirdos. An editorial in The Washington Examiner (hat tip Andy McCarthy) has the news. The NEA is distributing “stimulus” funds to such dubious enterprises as CounterPULSE, which, The Examiner reports

received $25,000 in stimulus funds, and which may be best known for its “Perverts Put Out,” a “long-running pansexual performance series.” The group urges guests, “Join your fellow pervs for some explicit, twisted fun.”

Looking for a Great Moment in Sophistry? Here’s one courtesy Patrice Powell, the NEA’s acting chairman.

“The NEA did not use [stimulus] dollars to fund any of the projects. [The grants] can only be used to provide salary support for staff positions or fees for previously-engaged artists and/or contractual personnel that are critical to an organization’s artistic mission and in jeopardy of being eliminated as a result of the current economic climate.”

Oh, I see. How do you spell “disingenuous twaddle”? We heard that a lot from NEA spokesmen back when they were funding the Mapplethorpe/Serrano/Finley brigade. “We aren’t actually supporting this ‘challenging’ ‘work’ which you are too bourgeois to appreciate. We are merely providing institutional” blah, blah blah. As the editorialist for The Washington Examiner notes,

In other words, you’re not paying for “Perverts Put Out.” You’re paying to make sure that CounterPULSE has enough money to produce “Perverts Put Out.”

A distinction, that is to say, without a difference.

Back in 1990, the “post-porn feminist” Annie Sprinkle, who has performed in more than 150 X-rated films and was for several years a prostitute, came to The Kitchen, a “cutting-edge” New York performance space, to reprise such classics from her repertoire as “Pornstistics,” “Sex Toys for World Peace,” and “Annie’s Cervix.” The Kitchen, it (almost) goes without saying, was the recipient of public funds from numerous entities. Early on in her performance, Miss Sprinkle, lying almost naked on a bed, urged members of the audience to come up to the stage to photograph her in any pose they liked. “Usually I get a lot of money for this,” she explained. “But tonight it’s government funded.” Déjà-vu, that is to say, all over again.

PJ Media appreciates your comments that abide by the following guidelines:

1. Avoid profanities or foul language unless it is contained in a necessary quote or is relevant to the comment.

2. Stay on topic.

3. Disagree, but avoid ad hominem attacks.

4. Threats are treated seriously and reported to law enforcement.

5. Spam and advertising are not permitted in the comments area.

These guidelines are very general and cannot cover every possible situation. Please don't assume that PJ Media management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment. We reserve the right to filter or delete comments or to deny posting privileges entirely at our discretion. Please note that comments are reviewed by the editorial staff and may not be posted immediately. If you feel your comment was filtered inappropriately, please email us at story@pjmedia.com.

10 Comments, 10 Threads

  1. 1. Harris Tweed

    THERE ARE FAR TOO MANY “ARTISTS.”

    As everyone knows, the word “art” has virtually no meaning anymore. The narcissists to whom you refer are licensed by the NEA to do anything they please as long as they call their actions “art.”

    Were the NEA to be disbanded, most people wouldn’t even notice, much less care.

  2. 2. Mike

    Nice to see the libertines are back in control of the public purse.

  3. 3. Chavo

    forgive my naivete, but what exactly is a “pansexual”?

  4. 4. biblio44

    As Commissar Kimball well knows, the NEA is still funding Shakespeare and hundreds of worthy cultural events and institutions across the US, and even under Gioia exhibitions of such “weirdos” as Mapplethorpe were funded.

  5. 5. Harris Tweed

    Any artist (or “artist”) who needs Federal Funding to make his or her art shouldn’t be an artist, and probably isn’t an artist (or is an incompetent artist).

    Government has no business supporting the arts.

    The quality of art has declined dramatically since the NEA began to subsidize artists.

  6. 6. Gaffe Prices

    Well, no one could say its inappropriate: I mean, how fitting is it that the administrations art of choice is porn?

  7. 7. Gaffe Prices

    APORN anyone? –”You’re gonna watch this, or else!!!”

  8. 8. SodaJerk

    News Item
    ==========

    A pretty good newscast summary on YouTube of “Perverts Put Out” and other outrages at:

    http://sayfienews.vodspot.tv/watch/3078981-perverts-put-out

  9. 9. Paleo_Bomba

    As is the case with all feminists you forgot to mention that Anne Sprinkle is a shapeless mass of cellulite. As you once wrote in The New Criterion, “modesty and scruple are the basis of any healthy eroticism.” I have had occasion to think about that often, recently. Certainly womens social status has declined drastically since the mass rapes that occurred at Haight Ashbury, much celebrated in the Black Panther underground press of the late 1960’s, and the calculated subversion of deportment characteristic of the resentful slobs who now blight the corporate/academic/media complex.

  10. 10. Douglas Johnson

    According to Rocco Landesman, the NEA’s new chairman, there’s an explanation for Roger’s criticism and anyone else who would question having to subsidize Perverts Put Out:

    “In American politics generally, he added: ‘The arts are a little bit of a target. The subtext is that it is elitist, left wing, maybe even a little gay.’”

    Read about this and more in the New York Times, right hereeeeee:
    http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/08/arts/08rocco.html?_r=1&hpw=&pagewanted=all

Leave a Reply

Click here to subscribe to the Daily Digest, to stay up to date with the latest at PJ Media. (You will be sent an email asking you to verify your email address. If you have previously subscribed, no verification email will be sent.)