Get PJ Media on your Apple

PJM Lifestyle

Just Following Orders: The Science Of Authority And Obedience

What makes ordinary people commit extraordinary atrocities?

Chris Queen


March 26, 2014 - 9:00 am
Page 1 of 2  Next ->   View as Single Page


Since the unspeakable horrors of the Holocaust, researchers have struggled to figure out what factors drive ordinary people to commit acts like those in Nazi Germany. Were the Germans of that era inherently evil, or did they simply fall in line with the orders of charismatic leaders like Hitler? Did William Calley’s defense of “just following orders” absolve him of his responsibility for the My Lai Massacre? Psychologists have spent years trying to figure out what’s behind obedience to authority.

In the early 1960s, psychologist Stanley Milgram embarked on a series of controversial experiments in which he set out to discover what factors lead regular people to commit atrocities. Milgram’s experiments involved subjects administering electric shocks to participants who, unbeknownst to the subjects, were actors involved with the experiments. Though many believed his experiments skirted the boundaries of ethics, Milgram concluded that people in general would obey orders regardless of the harm those orders may cause.

Author Gina Perry’s excellent 2013 book Behind The Shock Machine (which I recently read) recounts the experiments, and Perry discounts Milgram’s findings. She concludes that Milgram manipulated his results and that the experiments were as much about the theatrics as they were about getting to the bottom of the issue.

Today’s researchers are still trying to figure out the real motivation behind atrocities. In a recent Pacific Standard article, Bettina Chang recounts a more recent finding:

Sophie Richardot, a social psychologist at Université de Picardie, France, sought to answer this question. She first became interested in the subject in relation to Milgram’s famed obedience experiment. Milgram showed the disturbing extent to which normal people are willing to inflict pain on people in the name of obeying authority. Richardot says that Milgram’s orders were not coercive, but they were explicit.

From what she knew about the Holocaust and other mass war crimes, however, the orders were more coded and ambiguous. So she set about categorizing the orders given to commit war crimes and looking for patterns.

Comments are closed.

All Comments   (3)
All Comments   (3)
Sort: Newest Oldest Top Rated
"Those at the top of the hierarchy can make no such excuses". mean Jarret, Hagel, Reid and Dear Leader?
49 weeks ago
49 weeks ago Link To Comment
There is no "science" here. Milgram's so called experiments were faked, yet this was touted as social behavioral "science" to generations, including mine.

Truth is that the horror of mass grave killings by Einsatzgruppen were committed mostly by volunteers, many from Eastern Europe, Estonia, Lithuania, Ukraine, who were more than willing. They loved their jobs.

This idea that the majority of Nazis were duped or forced by a handful of psychopaths is a load of garbage based on disproven junk psychology.

49 weeks ago
49 weeks ago Link To Comment
49 weeks ago
49 weeks ago Link To Comment
View All