How would you like to save time, prevent pointless arguments, and become a much better communicator? What if I tell you it is surprisingly easy to do this and that even better, you don’t need to learn any comebacks, put-downs, or clever sayings? What if all you have to do to master this extraordinary new communications skill is – drumroll, please: learn how to ignore comments.
Yes, really.
Of course, it may sound counter-intuitive or perhaps even a little submissive. You may be thinking, “Geez, so you’re saying I should let people walk all over me? That’s just not my style, man!”
I used to think like that, too, which was really tough for me when I got on the Internet. Believe it or not, I used to be a little introverted and disliked conflict. So, the vicious, rough and tumble style of commenting that’s the rule of thumb online was not something I easily adapted to at first. I’d get upset when I was insulted. I was one of those people who’d go back and forth with someone 7-8 times in a thread. I’d spend a lot of time responding to dumb comments from anonymous people.
Then, I started blogging and as my traffic grew, more people started responding to what I wrote and emailing me. That was when it occurred to me that it made more sense to write a post for my entire audience to see than to respond in a comment section where only a sliver of the eyeballs reading my blog would catch it. As the numbers picked up, I formulated some general rules to determine when I’d respond to a comment or blog post about myself.
1) Is the criticism on point and worth responding to because it raised a good point?
2) Is the criticism from someone with a bigger audience than mine? Would I be “punching up”?
3) Could I make fun of the person criticizing me and entertain my audience?
If the criticism didn’t meet one of those standards, I just let it go…and guess what? It worked out really well.
After all, what difference does it make if Kilgore734 thinks you’re a show-off and hopes you’re hit by a bus on the way home; what difference does it make in your life? If your father or your boss or your girlfriend thought those things about you, it would be a big deal. But, if some random tool whom you don’t know, respect, or care about feels that way — who cares?
Categories: PJ Lifestyle Columns
Tags: Ignoring
Am I the first to ignore this column by reading it?
Good advice, and highly recommended for bloggers. Ignore what I call “fishbait” comments. Just don’t bite.
Now and then, you can make a really sweet point of your own by taking on a commenter who’s dangling fishbait. Just make sure it’s YOUR point that’s driving your response.
The intelligent commenters always “get it.”: Take that to the bank. They know what’s going on, and think the better of you for not biting on every flaming thing that passes by. The watching world ultimately rewards good temper, selectiveness, and coherence. Responding to combative commenters on their terms ends up being like hard cases making bad law. Just makes everyone wish first for a do-over, and then that they could be somewhere else.
This article may be of value to those who missed kindergarten or first grade.
Thank you for the opportunity to put this column into practice.
Having my side of a personal conversatin ignored would only piss me off more. The guy would either directly address my comment or we would not be talking in the future. Actually, I don’t know any females who would let this type of handling go, especially if they were already pissed.
What was that? Sorry, I was’t listening.
…
Those are really nice shoes. Where did you get them?
As a divorced woman I often ignored my husband when he went “off.” Like you, he couldn’t let things lie and my ignoring him drove him truly insane. Hence the divorce.
I think the point is that the person you are ignoring is not someone you care about but someone you want to keep from getting in the way of people you care about.
A guy once called me a far-right, conservative, Tea Party loving, gun loving, Bush-loving Republican, before he just about spat on me.
Although I didn’t ignore him, I simply replied, “Well, what’s your point?”
I love seeing people turn purple in the face when they have nothing to say.
You missed a great opportunity, Liberty.
You should have simply smiled and said, “Thank you.”
This should be labeled A VERY IMPORTANT COLUMN. Ilearned this skill as a child, mainly to deal with my very verbal mother. I think I picked it up from my father who lasted through 50+ years of marriage. Many should cultivate it and not scoff at it.
I often respond to people too often, especially on the internet. I see a lot of myself in that cartoon about the guy who is upset because someone else is wrong. I’m aware it’s a problem, but I still catch myself falling into that trap sometimes when it’s better to just let it go and allow the other guy to expose himself an idiot.
So, thanks for the good read, Mr. Hawkins. I needed the reminder.
People interested in another point of view on this topic should consider reading
“The Gentle Art of Verbal Self-Defense”
by Suzette Haden Elgin
I actually like the article, except the advice about women. The message I got was that sometimes people act like they are seven years old and should be ignored. Sometimes women act like they’re seven years old, but it’s just their female emotions talking,and they should be placated.
Found myself reacting the same as you, Melissa.
You have beautiful eyes.
Yes, you. Beautiful eyes. You have them.
Melissa,
Your eyes shimmer like a diamond, you are so lucky to be soooo beautiful.
In the “Credit Where Due” department, the original comic was drawn by Randall Munroe. Here’s the link -
http://xkcd.com/386/
Disappointing that John Hawkins sees fit to omit attributions, but that’s just one MORE thing wrong with Professor Gore’s internet.
Great advice! I would hope that it gets out to many of the younger generation…as well as those who are stressed out most of the time; they always seem to be defensive, on edge, read things into what’s being said and quick with a smart aleck answer! Very difficult to have a balanced, productive conversation with anyone like that.
Replying or not, are not the only alternatives. There are 3 good ways and several bad ways to handle a negative comment.
The good ways are: ignore it; give a dispassionate, reasoned reply, with supporting evidence where needed; or write a *short*, subtly sarcastic, dismissive reply, meant to show that you disagree but can’t be bothered to explain why.
The 3 numbered rules given by the author should be sufficient for deciding which tactic to adopt. (I trust I don’t have to explain that the 3 questions do not map 1 to 1 to the 3 tactics.) Basically you want to give a dispassionate, reasoned reply only to someone who might be able to understand it.
Some bad ways of handling a negative comment are: giving an angry reply, giving a reply while angry, and using ad hominem arguments. (Though, in small doses, ad hominem could perhaps be used in sarcastic, dismissive replies.)
It also helps to remember that a single vote doesn’t make any difference: if you remember that, why would you waste time trying to win a single vote to your cause?
Another good rule is never to put 2 distinct ideas in a single comment, which is why I am writing the following in a separate comment.
The way Mr. Hawkins would handle a nagging girlfriend is counter-productive in the medium to long term. To compliment somebody who nags, means to reward the nagging behavior. By the Law of Effect, the nagging is going to increase.
That does not mean one should get into a fight: a fight can be rewarding too, via an adrenaline rush. Rather, I’d give a short, subtly sarcastic, dismissive reply, then ignore her*.
For more details, see Winning the Games People Play, by Nathan Miron.
* Obviously the Law of Effect holds irrespective of whether the annoying behavior comes from a woman, from a man, or even from non-human animals of either sex. I believe, however, that pick-up artists (PUAs) would be the first to see what’s wrong with John Hawkins’ suggestion.
BRAVO, John Hawkins. This is good advise – for love, work, or trolls.
Your advice does not work on women! They always see through it. And while a cleverly phrased question about dinner, or a movie, seems like it should work, it only stalls the inevitable. But I can report, letting your attention wander a few times while being questioned for jury duty, does pretty much guarantee you will not serve on a jury.