Ed Driscoll

By Ed Driscoll

Bio

Get Updates From Ed Driscoll

Boy, does Chris work for the right network, or what?

But before we get to Matthews, some background from British journalist James Delingpole of the London Telegraph. Delingpole visits New York; gets immediately exposed to Krauthammer’s Law, when he asks “why it is that liberal-lefties manage to be so utterly wrong about everything,” and a presumably American libertarian friend replies, “Because they’re stupid:”

Advertisement

“No really they’re stupid because they’re not interested in facts. They just want to construct their pretty little narrative about the world, regardless of whether or not it has any bearing on reality. And then they want to dump it on us. And ruin our lives. So not just stupid but evil too.”

Well, you know me: what a big-hearted, sensitive, caring, emollient kind of guy I am. I thought these words were harsh, really harsh. But that was before I saw this video.

It features Chris Matthews, one of America’s most popular liberal talk show hosts, talking to a liberal journalist from liberal blogsite Salon called Joan Walsh and another liberal journalist from liberal Rolling Stone magazine on the liberal politics programme Hardball. And guess what these liberals believe the problem with Climate Change is? Go on: think of the most stupid, reality-denying, fact-ignoring, evidence-torturing tosh anyone involved in the media could possibly have to say on the subject. (H/T  Climate Depot)

Yes, that’s right.

They think that the naughty yellow pixies who pull the special, magic Climat-O-Levers which control the weather have been paid by evil capitalists with fat cigars in their mouth and $ signs on their pinstripe suits to make the world’s climate all horrid so that poor, underprivileged and disabled people and endangered creatures suffer – and that the reason we don’t know about it is because the media is run by evil Conservatives who want to keep this truth a secret.

Well, almost. What these liberal opinion-formers actually think – and you’ve really got to hand it to them: not even a lobotomised amoeba could beat them in a competition for dumbest creature on the planet, these three are absolute champs, Matthews especially, make no mistake – is as follows.

They think the main reasons for the public’s growing scepticism on Climate Change are 1. The media has been far too balanced on the subject and is not pushing the eco-message hard enough. 2. Big business is funding Climate Denialism. 3. Evil Conservatives – led by Evil Talk Show Hosts Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck – are deliberately telling lies about Climate Change. 4. The Republican party is “anti-science”.

My favourite bit is the one where Chris Matthews, who I believe takes himself seriously as a journalist, declares: “I hate that even-handed, so-called objective journalism. You know, you can’t say something isn’t true if it’s true….”

This isn’t exactly a new discovery for Matthews of course; as a headline at legacy industry publication Editor & Publisher trumpeted in 2007, “Climate Change: Get Over Objectivity, Newspapers.”

Thus pretty much setting the stage for how the industry covered the presidential election the following year — to which Michelle Obama said thanks, earlier today.

Update: Tim Blair adds, “In fact, our souls are evil. That’s what gives us our supernatural powers, enabling us to transform mere unpleasant emails into full-on death threats.”

Speaking of which: death threats, you say?

PJ Media appreciates your comments that abide by the following guidelines:

1. Avoid profanities or foul language unless it is contained in a necessary quote or is relevant to the comment.

2. Stay on topic.

3. Disagree, but avoid ad hominem attacks.

4. Threats are treated seriously and reported to law enforcement.

5. Spam and advertising are not permitted in the comments area.

These guidelines are very general and cannot cover every possible situation. Please don't assume that PJ Media management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment. We reserve the right to filter or delete comments or to deny posting privileges entirely at our discretion. Please note that comments are reviewed by the editorial staff and may not be posted immediately. If you feel your comment was filtered inappropriately, please email us at story@pjmedia.com.

5 Comments, 4 Threads, 1 Trackbacks

  1. 1. Moira

    It’s always a laugh when the wingnuts assure each other that Conservatives “hate science” when these discussions about global warming/climate change/climate disruption or whatever they’re calling it now never actually include any scientific information. They start with the assumption that the “science is settled” (in their favor) and skip straight to the part where they bash everybody who doesn’t agree with them. So, as we know, reality plays no part in their discussions. Chris Matthews and Joan Walsh are particularly pathetic in this regard.

    Liars and fools, that’s all they are.

  2. 2. Buck O'Fama

    I guess Matthews and his ilk don’t realize that fewer and fewer folks actually give a sh*t what they think anymore. Go ahead guys, get more unbalanced. It’ll wow the two or three people that still watch you.

  3. 3. cfbleachers

    Far be it from me to inject any snark about someone’s speech impediment, but I have always had a hard time with Matthews attempts at serious critique of important issues, because his voice always sounds on the brink of morphing into full on …baby talk.

    Senior Anchor Baby Talk….discusses today on MSNBC’s Hardball…a)the lack of private sector jobs, the open flouting of the War Powers Act, peekaboo I see you and where’s your nose, I got your nose.

    Since he treats the truth the way a baby treats a diaper, I do now, however have a better explanation for what that tingle was he felt running down his leg.

  4. 4. Pablo panadero

    Gotta disagree about the snark on Michelle o. Her comment was about the media playing nice with her family, which I would expect out of left or right media.

One Trackback to “Chris Matthews: ‘I Hate Even-Handed, So-Called Objective Journalism’”