Ed Driscoll

By Ed Driscoll

Bio

Get Updates From Ed Driscoll

In a new post on the PJM homepage, Rand Simberg spots something I hadn’t noticed when I blearily linked to the Daily Caller item on the JournoList during the Fitzgerald hour of 3:00 AM last night:

For a long time, while the bias in the media has always been obvious, I’ve always assumed that it was something in the water around the media coolers — that these people all lived in a self-reinforcing cocoon, marinating in confirmation bias, in which the correct attitudes were subtly rewarded, and the incorrect ones not-so-subtly punished. If someone had told me that they actively conspired to drive the message, trumpet and even make up stories that served their narrative, and suppress those that didn’t, or undermined it, I would have said that it was both unnecessary, and that even they weren’t that stupid.

But now, even without Breitbart having to pay the hundred Gs, the contents of the JournoList are starting to dribble out, and it’s not a pretty picture.

Advertisement

During the campaign, it almost looked as though there were a media conspiracy to avoid discussion of Jeremiah Wright. Well, now we know why. Simply put, there literally was.

But the ugliest thing is this:

Spencer Ackerman of the Washington Independent urged his colleagues to deflect attention from Obama’s relationship with Wright by changing the subject. Pick one of Obama’s conservative critics, Ackerman wrote, “Fred Barnes, Karl Rove, who cares — and call them racists.”

Emphasis mine.

Which is remarkable — in an effort to smear everyone to the right of Obama as racist, Ackerman is apparently admitting that half the country all looks alike to him. (And ultimately, it really was anyone even marginally to Obama’s right who were smeared as racists that year, as Bill, Hillary, Geraldine Ferraro, and heck, the voters in Pennsylvania’s Democratic primary can all attest.)

At the Daily Caller, Jim Treacher rounds up some further reaction from people who all look like to the members of the JournoList.

Update: Heh.™

Update: “Notice that Ackerman doesn’t even bother to ask people to look for actual evidence of racism, but just suggests to pick a conservative name out of a hat…It certainly puts efforts by the Left to paint the Tea Party as racist in an entirely new light.”

Update: At the Daily Caller, “Conservatives Karl Rove and Fred Barnes respond to Journolist ‘racist’ post.”

PJ Media appreciates your comments that abide by the following guidelines:

1. Avoid profanities or foul language unless it is contained in a necessary quote or is relevant to the comment.

2. Stay on topic.

3. Disagree, but avoid ad hominem attacks.

4. Threats are treated seriously and reported to law enforcement.

5. Spam and advertising are not permitted in the comments area.

These guidelines are very general and cannot cover every possible situation. Please don't assume that PJ Media management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment. We reserve the right to filter or delete comments or to deny posting privileges entirely at our discretion. Please note that comments are reviewed by the editorial staff and may not be posted immediately. If you feel your comment was filtered inappropriately, please email us at story@pjmedia.com.

1 Comments, 1 Threads

  1. 1. Neo

    “Fred Barnes, Karl Rove, who cares — and call them racists.”

    InstaPundit & PajamasMedia asks …

    Is this quote from Spencer Ackerman evidence of actual malice? Could it be invoked in a future libel case against Ackerman or his employer to show a habit of recklessness?

    Ooooow ! Legal action .. what a bummer. Bet Ackerman didn’t talk to his lawyer before sending that e-mail.
    These Journolist clowns may think that they are just performing some sort of sophomoric prank, but there may be legal (civil not criminal) implications that could affect them and their employers that are yet to unfold.