Roger L Simon tells libertarians that it's time to put on their big boy pants:
But paradoxically, during this same time frame, it has become perhaps even more evident that one of the apparent tenets of libertarianism — a kind of neo-isolationism — is, well, to put it bluntly, insane. In the era of the Islamic State (not to mention a dozen other similar murderous, increasingly global organizations we could name or are being invented as I write), anyone who believes we can roll up the gangplanks to create the perfect libertarian state and everything will be just ducky is living in dreamland.
But a fair number of libertarians are. As an example, one of the leading spokesmen for the movement (I’ll be gracious by not naming him, because he’s probably embarrassed at this point) was quoted as likening the problem of Islamic terrorism to herpes — I guess he meant an annoyance you can live with if you find the right partner (who doesn’t behead you).
Do those same isolationist libertarians think that one Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, current leader of the Islamic State, was kidding when he said “See you in New York” when let out of detention camp in Iraq in 2009?
Read the whole thing.
I've been saying much the same -- although probably not as well -- since about 9/12/2001.
The idea that Islamists with global ambitions would leave us alone if we were only more libertarian... it's not just nuts, it's dangerously nuts.
Article printed from VodkaPundit: https://pjmedia.com/vodkapundit
URL to article: https://pjmedia.com/vodkapundit/2014/8/25/required-reading-517