Trump’s New Immigration Order Creates Database of Honor Killings
President Trump’s new executive order on immigration calls for the establishment of a public database of honor killings, which are defined as “gender-based violence against women … in the United States by foreign nationals.”
This is an extraordinary first step towards protecting Americans not just from jihad massacres, but from the cultural encroachments of a societal system that institutionalizes discrimination against women, non-Muslims, gays, and others.
Predictably, the Left hates it. They have steadfastly refused to notice anything about Sharia that is oppressive or destructive to the human spirit.
Jeva Lange writes in The Week:
Alleged “honor killings” are a major concern of opponents of the U.S. refugee programs, although supporters of refugee programs say the language demonizes Muslims and that there is insufficient evidence of such killings by refugees in the United States.
“Demonizes Muslims”? This is just more Leftist hysteria. In reality, the new version of the immigration ban maintains that the first version was “not motivated by animus toward any religion,” and doesn’t associate honor killings with Islam. Lange is concerned, however, about comments from Attorney General Jeff Sessions, the target of the Leftist establishment’s latest attempt to demonize and destroy members of the Trump team:
[Sessions] has expressed concern about honor killings in the past, such as in a 2016 discussion with a State Department official.
In that discussion, Sessions noted:
Twenty-seven people were killed in the United States for honor killings according to a DOJ report.
Obama State Department official Simon Henshaw replied:
I have no evidence that there were any honor killings among the refugee population resettled in the U.S., sir.
Well, it’s from the same cultural background, I would say.
Lange then quoted Farhana Khera of Muslim Advocates claiming that while Sessions was in the Senate, he was:
... one of the most, if not the most, anti-immigrant senator in the U.S. Senate. … He has a long record of demonizing non-white immigrants, especially Muslim and Latino immigrants.
While making these utterly baseless charges that Sessions is a racist, Khera was apparently silent about the reality of honor killing. (Lange doesn’t mention the fact that it was Khera who wrote to John Brennan in 2011 demanding that all mentions of Islam and jihad be removed from counterterror training materials. Brennan immediately complied.) Was Sessions correct when he noted that immigrants “from the same cultural background” as those who have committed honor killings in the U.S. might share a positive view of the practice, and even resort to it themselves in extreme circumstances?
To answer that question, it is useful to know that Muslims commit 91 percent of honor killings worldwide -- and they do so with justification for their actions in Islamic law.
A manual of Sharia which was certified as a reliable guide to Sunni orthodoxy by Al-Azhar University, the most respected authority in Sunni Islam, says that:
[R]etaliation is obligatory against anyone who kills a human being purely intentionally and without right.
[N]ot subject to retaliation [is] a father or mother (or their fathers or mothers) for killing their offspring, or offspring’s offspring. ( Reliance of the Traveller o1.1-2).
Someone who kills his or her child incurs no legal penalty under Islamic law. And this is not just some legal abstraction -- it is incorporated into present-day law in many Islamic countries:
-- The Palestinian Authority gives pardons or suspended sentences for honor murders.
-- Iraqi women have asked for tougher sentences for Islamic honor murderers, but there is no change yet.
-- Syria, in 2009, scrapped a law limiting sentences for honor killings. However:
“[T]he new law says a man can still benefit from extenuating circumstances in crimes of passion or honour ‘provided he serves a prison term of no less than two years in the case of killing.’”
-- In 2003, the Jordanian Parliament voted down, on Islamic grounds, a provision designed to stiffen penalties for honor killings. Al-Jazeera reported:
“Islamists and conservatives said the laws violated religious traditions and would destroy families and values.”
Until the encouragement Islamic law gives to honor killing is acknowledged and confronted, more women will suffer. The Palestinian Authority, Iraq, and Jordan are not named in the ban, but the countries that are named share this “cultural background.”
Trump is right to protect women from this scourge.
Will another Leftist court, acting in the name of “tolerance” and “multiculturalism,” find it somehow unconstitutional to protect women in this way?