05-14-2019 01:57:15 PM -0400
05-09-2019 05:01:30 PM -0400
05-09-2019 01:41:48 PM -0400
04-18-2019 10:46:35 AM -0400
04-18-2019 10:18:40 AM -0400
It looks like you've previously blocked notifications. If you'd like to receive them, please update your browser permissions.
Desktop Notifications are  | 
Get instant alerts on your desktop.
Turn on desktop notifications?
Remind me later.


Austin Petersen's Anti-Religion Stance Could Lose Him Some Key Supporters

Austin Peterson

I like Austin Petersen. I supported the would-be Libertarian Party presidential nominee in the earliest days of my Never Trump declaration, when I still held out hope that Petersen could beat Gary Johnson for the nomination.

Petersen is a different kind of face for the Libertarian Party. He's younger than I am, which (other than making me feel old) appeals to me as one who has advocated for Baby Boomer politicians to get out of the way. He espouses a pro-life position, and he has expressed support for religious liberty. In the coming years, if he can stay in the forefront of the debate over freedom, Austin Petersen can become a force in the liberty movement.

But over Labor Day weekend, Petersen managed to make some statements that could lose him some key supporters. On Sunday, he forwarded an article from his website, The Libertarian Republic, on his Facebook page. The article, entitled "Top 10 Reasons Mother Teresa Was a Fraud," managed to denigrate the venerated -- and newly sainted -- nun. The piece, which Petersen did not write, accuses Mother Teresa of supporting dictators, of "being out for herself," and of putting medical care second to reaching people with the gospel.

I'm not here to debate the veracity of the author's claims (and I'm personally weirded out a little by the whole Catholic sainthood thing myself), but it was clearly written from the perspective of a person without faith. And it was just the beginning.

Later on in the day, Petersen made a couple of posts that proceeded to lash out at religion and believers. The first one read:

To a non-believer, there is nothing sacred, and nothing holy. To the skeptic, no one is above Earthly examination and criticism. Humans are not inherently fallen, but neither are we infallible. Humanity has suffered precisely because of our blind deference to archons, saints, government officials, and "sages" wearing funny hats... or combovers.

Look, I get part of what he's saying here, that we shouldn't put blind trust in leaders. What Petersen doesn't understand is that faithful believers put their trust in God far above man.