Ed Driscoll



Take a look at Time magazine’s cover this week. It features an artist’s rendering of one of the photographs from Abu Ghraib with the line: “Iraq: How Did It Come to This?”

“It” didn’t come to “this.” “It” is a war to liberate 25 million people and rout Islamic extremists, terrorists and those who thirst for the mass murder of Americans. “This” was an aberrancy that was stopped almost five months ago, when the revelations at Abu Ghraib led to investigations, arrests and the wholesale reinvention of the Iraq prison system.

Time’s cover line is a vile and grotesque slander against every American in uniform in Iraq. It remains the case, more than two weeks after the public exposure of the Abu Ghraib photographs, that not a single digital photo showing mistreatment has emerged from another cellblock at that self-same prison, or from any of the other 24 prisons in Iraq.

Indeed, every photograph shown to U.S. senators yesterday is part of the same set of pictures featuring the same eight dirtbags.

The scandal isn’t widening. If anything, it’s contracting. The focus continues to zoom in on the actual people in the pictures and their disgusting conduct in them. And yet Teddy Kennedy, a man who once let a woman die, feels free to speak the following unspeakable words: “We now learn that Saddam’s torture chambers reopened under new management, U.S. management.”

The United States is, according to the man in whose car Mary Jo Kopechne drowned, no better than the regime of Saddam Hussein.

Teddy Kennedy isn’t just some outlier. Teddy Kennedy is the chief surrogate of the Democratic candidate for president of the United States and a lionized figure – so lionized that a worshipful profile of him published in Boston magazine won a major journalism award last year.

So let’s be clear what’s going on here. As we speak, 138,000 Americans are serving under dangerous conditions in Iraq. And our forces in Karbala are fighting against the goons and thugs of Muqtada al-Sadr with some success. They’re risking their lives for freedom and honor and duty and love of country.

And conventional liberal opinion wants them to lose.


Back in December, Charles Johnson wrote:

Am I the only one who thinks it’s more than a little weird that TIME Magazine names “The American Soldier” as their “Person of the Year,” only days after publishing a story by a TIME reporter who’s hangin’ out with the mujahideen trying to kill that same “Person of the Year?”

Linking to Johnson’s post, I wrote, “Pick a side boys, so the readers know where you stand”.

Looks like they have.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member