World Naked Bike Ride, San Francisco
[NOTE: This is the CENSORED version of this report, and is pretty much "safe for work" and family-friendly. If you want to see the UNCENSORED edition, which is most definitely NOT safe for work, click HERE. Aside from covering up the private parts, the reports are otherwise identical.]

Saturday, June 11 was “World Naked Bike Ride” day in San Francisco. As the title implies, it doesn’t happen only in San Francisco — it’s a global event, with rides in over 70 cities around the world.

Ex-Congressman Anthony Weiner is recently unemployed, so I got him a gig as the censor for today’s event. As an expert in penis-photographs, he definitely has the skills for the job! Throughout this censored version of the World Naked Bike Ride report, wherever you would have seen a wiener, you’ll see a Weiner instead!

Participants gathered in Justin Herman Plaza in San Francisco’s Embarcadero area. Anyone could join in — anyone who enjoys being naked in public, that is.

The main question gawkers ask is, “Why???” Well, in theory at least, there is a political dimension to the World Naked Bike Ride, which gives me an excuse to report on it. Luckily, the event’s main organizers have posted an FAQ page for the perplexed. The question “Why are you riding naked?” is answered with “To celebrate cycling and the human body. The ride demonstrates the vulnerability of cyclists on the road and is a protest against oil dependency.” In addition, the WNBR main page states, “We face automobile traffic with our naked bodies as the best way of defending our dignity and exposing the unique dangers faced by cyclists and pedestrians as well as the negative consequences we all face due to dependence on oil, and other forms of non-renewable energy.”
Hmmmm. Seems the message is a little muddled. Several justifications are given:
1. “To celebrate the human body.”
2. To bring attention to how dangerous it is for cyclists on city streets.
3. To protest oil dependency and the oil-based economy.
4. To promote bike-riding and make a stand against the car culture.
But, as the sarcastic commentary about nuclear energy in the picture above shows, nuclear power is also no longer kosher. Yet if you eliminate oil/coal/gas and nuclear…all other energy sources combined account for only 19% of current global needs, so it’s not clear exactly what kind of serious viable solution they’re proposing.

Even so, I suspect there’s only one real reason motivating the World Naked Bike Ride: exhibitionism, or the desire to be naked in public. The rest of the justifications are just a political veneer.

Here’s something you may not have known: If you’re young, skinny, female and half-naked, people will want to take your picture. Learn something new every day!

A guy in all-body tiger paint seemed to be one of the ride organizers.

He happily posed for souvenir photographs with passing tourists.

But when he bends over, watch out! Ass cracks are ass cracks, with or without body paint.

During the pre-ride preparations, one of the riders stood off to the side to make a cell phone call. He was approached by stunned out-of-towners who had summoned up the nerve to ask him what the heck was going on. He nonchalantly explained.
Side note: notice the kid sitting behind the naked guy. No attempt was made, on the part of the participants, police, or public, to keep kids at a safe distance from all the full-frontal nudity.

While a few of the participants were somewhat demure about their private parts being exposed, or were at most faux-nonchalant, most of the rest made a point of exposing themselves as vividly as possible.

Several “participants” did not even have bicycles: They just showed up for the hour-long pre-ride preparation period because it was an opportunity to have a “valid” excuse for being naked in public.

These two guys, for example, showed up, disrobed, stood around for ten minutes posing naked for all the photographers, then put their clothes back on and left! Bicycles had nothing to do with it.

In what I hereby deem as “Worst Public Relations Decision of the Week,” the Nesquik Bunny showed up to hand out free chocolate milk samples to the exhibitionists, and posed for pictures alongside various bizarre characters.

The rest of the Nesquik team joined the fun. And no matter what he was standing next to, the Bunny always kept the same goofy smile, which made the proceedings even more surreal, if that was possible.

The legendary parrots of Telegraph Hill looked down on all the human flesh. “Squawk! Those flightless giant pink birds have lost all their feathers! Squawk!”

Naked lunch.

Here’s an only-in-San-Francsisco moral dilemma: A pre-op transsexual showed up for the ride. He/she thankfully wore shorts, but was “topless.” Now, it was pretty obvious that he/she had not yet undergone gender reassignment surgery, so was technically still biologically “male,” as the muscular physique revealed. But he/she was also either starting hormone treatments, and/or had small implants, because a modest pair of breasts was beginning to emerge. Bay Area Political Correctness dictates that one must always acknowledge and respect whichever gender someone declares him- or herself to be. But wider U.S. social standards dictate that (in the censored version of this report) I cover up any naked boobs exposed in public. Yet censorship is frowned upon according to S.F. mores, while the wider U.S. social standards would not regard this person as yet a woman. So I’m damned if I do, and damned if I don’t!

To censor, or not to censor — that is the question! (In the end, as you can see, I decided to not censor; if you’re open-minded, you can take this to mean that I too am open-minded and oppose censorship; if you’re more old-fashioned, you can take this to mean that I think men are men, regardless of what they think they are. Whew! Wriggled my way out of that one.)

But I’m not safe for long: I’m immediately forced to confront another moral dilemma: How to document the fact that kids were present at this event and witnessing all the full-frontal nudity? Even though there would be “news value” in showing such pictures, there’s also a taboo against having kids and nudity in the same picture. So, to be prudent, I deleted almost all images that showed kids witnessing the goings-on, lest I set off alarms with the Internet Police. (I was also compelled to do this in all my previous “naked San Francisco” reports, of which there have been many.) As a compromise, I show here a guy who brought his months-old baby to the event. Fortunately, the kid seemed far too young to have any awareness of what was going on.

As one point, an unfortunate accidental photographic alignment seemed to show the kid grabbing the ding-dong of one of the riders; but it was all a foreshortening illusion — they were several yards apart.

Sunny day + no clothes = sunburn! So before departing, the participants lined up in a sunscreen elephant-train, lathering it on each other.

Almost time to go! The organizers handed out route maps to the riders: at noon they were all going to start biking around the entire city for several hours, shocking passersby and changing the world! (Notice the cigarillo the guy is smoking. Health!)

Time to pose for one last souvenir shot, to satisfy all the rubberneckers.

And we’re off! After a brief whirl around the plaza and through the craft booths, the riders made their way to the Embarcadero to start their ride along the waterfront.

Some old-school San Francisco natives encountered the lead bike with its sign and gestured at it in disgust. “C’mon, you bozos! You can’t be serious!”

Even this passing tourist cast a jaundiced eye on the proceedings.
As you can see, it was very male-centric at the San Francisco edition of the World Naked Bike Ride. But that’s not necessarily true at many of the other rides in other cities. The London World Naked Bike Ride, for example, is not only ten times the size of the S.F. ride, but is almost half female. And elsewhere in Europe and Australia you’ll find the event to be more gender-balanced.
Were any minds changed by this “protest”? Probably not. Were viable solutions proposed? Nope. Did people “make a statement”? Well, sure, but if your statement is little more than “Look at me, I’m naked!”, then it’s not very clear what you have achieved.






Those bicycle seats are going to need some serious disinfecting.
You may not have caught this, but there not only was an L.A. World Naked Bike Ride, but it made the news because some of the cyclists was assaulted by a maniac while they passed Echo Park:
http://www.theeastsiderla.com/2011/06/naked-bike-ride-rolls-into-trouble-in-echo-park/
I’m sorry they were attacked, and I’m glad it wasn’t worse. Not very competent attackers, evidently.
Are you sure a normal person didn’t assault a maniac?
Why do we even have R rated movies if guys can run around completely naked in broad daylight?
That means, at least theoretically, that there is someone in the U.S. who thinks this is wrong. Apparently that guy got out of his car.
I wish I had known, I would have gone.
I’m sorry to see that they were attacked, but personally I find public nudity obnoxious and even offensive. Not because I am a prude, but because I have a 5 year old daughter and I really don’t like the idea that I may be walking down the street with her and encounter a bunch of naked men with their Weiners hanging out. To be honest, I’m surprised they were only attacked ONCE. Echo Park is not San Francisco or West Hollywood, it’s a fairly rough, mostly Hispanic neighborhood. And the ride down Sunset from Silverlake (a hipster/gay neighborhood)to Downtown runs directly past a number of churches and elementary schools…and right through the center of Echo Park where there are often many children with out shopping with their parents. The very fact that you can obtain a city permit to engage in public nudity is preposterous – another sign of the decline of our culture.
Although, in defense of Los Angeles I might point out that our nude biker-riders are better looking than San Francisco’s…
http://www.laweekly.com/slideshow/world-naked-bike-ride-l-a-nsfw-30120632/3/
…and some Febreze®!
I need to bleach my eyes and grab a vomit bag.
The writing and captions for these photos was hilarious though.
The parrots look traumatized.
Who knew the NESQUIK® Bunny was a total pervo? Ewwwwww
Ewwwwwwwwwwww
EWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW
Much like nudist colonies…not a single body I’d ever want to see naked and there they all are, ingloriously bobbing up and down (or sagging) for all the world to see (and photo).
*barfs*
I’m especially alarmed over children actually being there.
Whiskey Tango Foxtrot?????
National Geographic never made me feel this skeevy.
Ugh. I feel like I need a Silkwood shower now.
Delia: “The writing and captions for these photos was hilarious though.”
Zombie always rocks the captions with scalpel-like wit and commentary.
I’d highly recommend a visit to her/his original blog zombietime. A 8+ year journey down memory lane…er, I mean memory gutter.
I totally concur. Zombie is hella funny and his/her zingers are legendary. I think I once visited Zombie’s other blog but didn’t have time to really scour it. Thank you for the link!
It was a nice subtle piece of humor to put minuscule Weiners over the cloacal vents of the watching parrots – even though parrots of either sex don’t actually have wieners!
There was an article about the Portland ride, too.
My question is always (especially for the women) how can you ride naked? The discomfort in some very delicate feminine bits makes me shudder.
I ride, and cannot imagine riding naked.
Hilarious and rather sad, like all too many things like this. Good job, zombie!
AGREED! Furthermore, how can guys ride naked on bikes without damaging something? They have more junk than us!
Not to mention, what if a flock of birds thought one of those things was a worm?
That reminds me of a joke.
A mother superior and five nuns are travelling around the countryside on a bicycle built for six. Every time they pass over a bumpy section, the nuns start giggling and squealing. Finally, the mother superior turns around and says “Sisters, you must learn to control yourselves or I’ll put the seats back on the bicycle!”
LOL! That’s kinda hot.
I was told that joke in mixed company by a good friend who happens to be female so I figured I could get away with it here. I’m glad you weren’t offended
What irritates me is it is just another example of how the law doesn’t apply to everyone.
It all depends on who you are.
They get a permit every year. What, exactly, it all means is a bit of a mystery, but they do this, and it’s always made me shake my head.
I think Alana’s point was interesting.
Would people for “God, Constitution & Country” be allowed a permit to march down SanFran? Highly unlikely.
When can we have a Counterjihad – Ban the Burqa – No Mosques march in SF?
Just askin’.
HA!!!
Dream on. lol That would be AWESOME if possible though.
Well, this article made me look up naked bike rides going on in other cities, and one of them mentioned there was a $100 ordinance against being naked in public, but they “did not enforce it” for this event.
(I forget which city it was.)
I just need to know one thing: was Inflated Scrotum Guy riding that day?
And why the HELL was Nesquik there?
Okay, that’s two questions, but still… shudder
Question to the other person who recommended this on facebook – does it show up on your wall? I ask because it’s not showing on mine.
Dear God. There are some bodies that just should not be celebrated! Unfortunately, those seem to be the ones who most love to bare all.
Seriously. I’m almost pro-burka for MEN after seeing this. j/k
I went for the uncensored first, thinking I could see scrotum man again but sad to say no. Then I came back for the censored. Thank you so much for the hearty laugh! I needed that this week.
Indeed. No one wants to see normal people naked. Swingers, nude beaches, nudists… they are all just awful. That’s why we have porn. Those are professional naked people.
If we could develop some sort of ESP or the ability to project emotions I’m sure this would all stop. If these people could instantly feel the disgust and humor others feel when looking at them they would never take off their clothes again.
So, once again to all the naked bike people, you are NOT cool, NOT progressive, NOT making a difference.
Those are considered ‘normal’ bodies to you? AYYYYYYYY #scared
My hubby and I look way better than those peeps and neither of us need porn. lol
We had the a Portland naked ride last week. Easy to ignore. At the most immeadiate level it strikes me as being similar to the introduction of dodge ball and kick ball as adult recreational sports in Portland parks: Kid stuff carried on in to a gummy middle-age. But, who can deny the right of adult children of adults their fun? A sour killjoy, of course.
However, here in Portland we have infrastructral problems (The Sellwood, a major Willamtte River bridge is literally falling in to the river). The problems range from serious to those not so much, potholes for example.
But, bicyclists and their advocates have received extraordninary resources and influence. Funds needed for basic maintenance programs are diverted to bike projects. Bicyclists here are a privileged class of citizen who do not use their machines on our damp, cold, and windy roads for 9 months of the year.
The bike crowd has obtained permanent and temporary street re-routing and material alterations that often put the driver at hazard, but assure the biker of his convenience. This coming week end the entry and exit from my neighborhood will be reminsicent of post-war Vienna as the city has designated it as the ride around Portland neighborhood. Think checkpoints everywhere.
It is no single thing but an accumulation of privileges, expenditures, and inconveniences that gather to make the fun bike people onerous.
I’ve had a good bike for over 50 years. Rode one in Portland for four years in the early 90s without owning a car. I’ve ridden the length of the Baja Peninsula as well as other touring journeys.
What is happening in Portland is juvenille waste. Moreover, most of these passionate young and vital creatives will vote on local issues,that’s for sure,
but then they’ll move home to mom and dad’s in California or where ever to attempt entry into adult life. I live with their legacy.
The whitest group of people since the last such set of pictures.
Spot on, while “other” ethnic groups are busy burglarizing their homes while the honkys are out making fools of themselves, ya think?
People should not go nude in public unless they are in shape. I like Boogeyman’s statement about “professional naked people.” Strippers, porn stars, actresses, etc…or at least people who [i]could[/i] be naked models. Not pudgy, fat, flabby, old, and flopping all over the place. As far as the vast majority of humanity goes, there is no beauty in the naked body. That’s why our ancestors invented clothes – to keep us from gouging our own eyes out.
And, no…I may be in shape, but I don’t look all that great naked myself. Then again, I’m not going on naked bike rides, either.
The City of San Francisco is synonymous with Sodom and Gomorrah. This naked bike ride is really nothing more than an excuse for a bunch of “naturalists” (didn’t they used to be called Nudists?) to expose themselves to the rest of the city.
Really, I have no problem if someone wants to do this sort of thing in a gated resort. But to do this on the street, in public –at what point can we call this indecent? What next? Public demonstrations of Gay Sex? (oh, wait… that’s been done already, hasn’t it?)
I just now noticed that Zombie photoshopped Weiner’s face on the parrot’s privates too.
You big goof! LMAO
What level of narcissism must you have as a middle age guy to think ANYONE would want to look at you naked?
The same old farts who fantasize about scoring young hotties on Roissy DC. Talk about delusional. lol
It is pretty realistic for reasonably fit sixty year old male to expect to score an OK looking thirty five year old female. It is somewhat realistic for a forty five year old female to hope for a quick anonymous bang by younger male. It is not realistic for a forty five year old women to expect to start a relationship with a forty five year old male, or even a fifty five year old male.
I never realized there were so many rules!
If people only went by what was “realistic,” there would be a lot of lonely people in this world.
I’m with Jerry Seinfeld. I think alcohol explains how some of these people get together.
Those dating rules suck, so don’t follow ‘em.
The only rule I ever obeyed on dating was: No married men.
Beyond that? Whatever works, and a whole lot does.
LMFAO!!!!!!!!!!!!
No words. No words.
JUST ROTFL!
In private, maybe.
In public, NO!
A few years ago the city of Brattleboro, Vermont legalized public nudity. What happened then was that ugly old men started walking around town naked. I think they repealed that law. If they weren’t so leftist they could have foreseen what would happen, but leftists are stupid and they can’t foresee anything.
Yeah, that didn’t see that the only ones who would want to run around nekkid are the old farts who usually wear raincoats and flash. lulz
Leftists never, ever, NEVER see far enough ahead for ‘unintended consequences’. Just like that stupid ‘phosphate’ ban. Now I add my own Trisodium Phosphate + Citric acid to my dishwasher detergent because the new crap without it almost wrecked my damned dishwasher! IDIOTS!
OK, pay attention. This is important: never, never, never buy a used bicycle in SF. This is an exception to the never say never rule.
Is that like the “Christine” Plymouth Fury that is possessed, only in this case, possessed by stank balls?
I have a solution to your moral dilemma about kids in photos. Cover the entire child with Elmo. (You’d need a couple of Elmos to show which way the kid was facing.) That way you could show how grotesque the adults are being, while offering the kids at least some of the protection nobody else was offering.
Elmo is a ‘brand’ that is copyrighted by PBS & CO…
But…the ‘Pedobear’ image is a free-for-all.
GAH! lol
Thank you for the opacity of the Weiners.
LOL! Zombie is way too polite to play with our heads with the opacity slider just to see if we were paying attention…
…I think…
Yeah. Zombie keeps the opacity at 100% for the fig-leaf/wiener coverage.
Genitalia is the new “black” I guess?
/sarc
I checked out the uncensored version and I have to say, you probably could have shrunk the Weiner heads a tad smaller on most of the guys in that crowd and still kept the article safe for work. At any rate, why don’t we count the ways in which this event is moronic, especially in San Francisco:
1) A pathetic pretext for riding in the buff so exhibitionists can do their thing.
2) Held in the summer when temperatures are highest
3) Held at NOON when the sun is the most bright and the most hot, thus elevating the chances of getting really bad sunburn ALL OVER THEIR BODIES
4) Nothing between a hot, sticky bicycle seat and one’s gonads (shudder)
5) THE MAJORITY OF THE PEOPLE AREN’T WEARING BICYCLE HELMETS
6) THE MAJORITY OF THE PEOPLE ARE OLDER AND MORE LIKELY TO GET HEAT STROKE
7) Children are exposed to the ugly people exposing themselves
8 ) Participants leave themselves exposed to criticism and ridicule by tourists and talented bloggers who use photos in their essays
Did I miss anything?
Fedora Guy
I checked out the uncensored version and I have to say, you probably could have shrunk the Weiner heads a tad smaller on most of the guys in that crowd and still kept the article safe for work.
*Spews coffee on monitor*
Bwahahahahaha!
Did I miss anything?
Not anything that others haven’t already mentioned, I think. That list is a good summation…just add in the traumatized parrots and the creepy pedobear/NESQUIK® Bunny and that about ‘covers it’ (or not). lol
The Naked Bike Ride is just pure stupid and nonsense! It’s a stupid, juvenile way to gain attention. It means nothing.
All that was missing was the cast of the View. Imagine Whoopi Goldberg?
Not a single one of them is actually good-looking. Not a single six-pack of abs.
Wrong – there were at least two guys in nice shape. The two girls were in reasonable condition and rather cute.
Stupid, but cute.
Exhibitionism & partying in the streets are central to the Leftoid soul.
Breasts not bombs and old men injecting their testicles to inflate them (“gonad inflation”) and then walking around showing off their giant balloons, could you imagine any bigger morons ?
The Bay Area has more than its fair share.
I guess there’s a positive side to this. There’s probably fewer bicycles stolen in San Fran on account.
That would be a great deterrent even if you didn’t ride your bike naked. Print/engrave it on your rear bike-plate: “I ride this seat naked on weekends and at SanFran events”…”touch at your own risk”
lulz
Nudies are mostly harmless folks. I have few issues with it so long as there are designated areas where people can be nekkid and not bother anyone else.
Just set aside an area where these folks can frolic in the buff and I think there will be no civil disturbance. Last thing most want is to be gawked at. These people are an exception.
A libertarian can undestand that if no harm then no crime.
Yep this is not for public square. A nice beach park out of town Is better.
You’re missing the point.
I’m all in favor of folks being nude on private land or in well-marked publicly-agreed-upon public areas (like isolated beaches, etc.) And these people have PLENTY of nude-only areas where they can congregate in the Bay Area (some in San Francisco itself, like Baker Beach, etc.).
But that’s not what they want. They don’t want to be sectioned off from society, only visible to other nudists.
What they want is for other non-nude people to look at them. Otherwise, they wouldn’t do events like this one.
They are exhibitionists. They may be “an exception,” but there seem to be a lot of them in the Bay Area — perhaps more than other places.
I have a theory about various forms of modern leftism being little more than “exhibitionism,” of which this is just the most blatant example — but that’s for a different essay.
I did not miss the point. I agree with it.
There is another dimension besides left right. Liberty and authority run on the x axis, if you will, with what we think of as liberal conservative on the y.
You live in a very unusual place in America. On one hand happy meals are banned, but nude bike rides through the center of town us ok. That is nuts.
And the ‘nuts’ insist on exhibiting their ‘nuts’ in a most unbecoming fashion. lol
I’m curious how is it the city of San Francisco allows public nudity. Mission Street fair is limited to a small strip on Mission, but this Bike Ride is going through the whole city. Are people too sheepish to complain?
And, oh, pre-op transsexuals were not the only men with breasts in this event.
Yeah, there were a lot of bitch-tits displayed there.
LMFAO
I loved the Weiners ob the budgies’ bottoms!
Zombie, will you marry me?
Complements to Gay Marriage and Gay Pride
It seems only appropriate to complement, not compliment, Friday’s passage of New York State’s deceptively-titled Marriage Equality Act and Sunday’s New York City’s Gay Pride Parade with some related news stories, one equally-bizarre.
For those unaware–and you really should try to keep up–New York’s Democrat Governor Andrew Cuomo late Friday eagerly affixed his signature to a law passed overwhelmingly by Democrat legislators, with aid, comfort, and votes furnished by four Republicans, which grants official approval for men to wed men, women to marry women, and God only knows what else in the Empire State.
The timing couldn’t have been better for homosexuals since passage of the law coincides with the annual Gay Pride Week culminating on Sunday with a parade which wrapped up in Greenwich Village where the gay liberation movement began.
As of this writing, news coverage on the parade is just coming in and what’s hit the MSM wires and local tv channels are the usual sanitized reports devoid of what goes on at such parades plus heaps of adulation poured on Cuomo for his coverage. The governor marched this year to much applause in preparation for his guaranteed run for the presidency in 2016 after locking up 2% of the electorate, the gay vote.
If the festivities were anything like previous gay parades and, after Democrats got their way and passed the Marriage Equality Act only days before, the parade probably surpassed homosexual excesses of the past.
Those excesses and what follows give added credibility to Archbishop Timothy Dolan’s dire analysis that the new law threatens “the cornerstones of civilization.”
See “Gays on Parade–Literally!” for some insight, including a video of a previous Gay Pride parade featuring, among other obscenities, Big Apple Dem politicians and a giant, green penis flailing onlookers, (http://bit.ly/l8RqxS)
One anticipated, intended consequence of passing the Marriage Equality Act was articulated by New York’s junior senator, Kirsten Gillibrand. She was “thrilled” with the new law but cautioned that, ”Our work is not done.” Having learned well her lessons from her mentor, New York’s senior senator Chuch Schumer, she indicated that congress will renew its efforts to repeal another bulwark of civilization, the Defense of Marriage Act, DOMA. . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=4901)
How come it’s mostly men at these events? I demand justice justice. We need to see more women.
[/sad juvenile demand]