Get PJ Media on your Apple

VodkaPundit

That’s Not What I Thought They Meant by Single Payer

January 2nd, 2013 - 1:21 pm

More on the Democrats’ War on Women:

The requirement for employers to provide health benefits to employees is a cornerstone of the new law, but the new rules proposed by the Internal Revenue Service said that employers’ obligation was to provide affordable insurance to cover their full-time employees. The rules offer no guarantee of affordable insurance for a worker’s children or spouse. To avoid a possible tax penalty, the government said, employers with 50 or more full-time employees must offer affordable coverage to those employees. But, it said, the meaning of “affordable” depends entirely on the cost of individual coverage for the employee, what the worker would pay for “self-only coverage.”

The new rules, to be published in the Federal Register, create a strong incentive for employers to put money into insurance for their employees rather than dependents.

Sandra Fluke will free birth control provided by the Catholic Church by mandate, but stay-at-home moms are going to be hit hard by ObamaCare.

Click here to view the 6 legacy comments

Comments are closed.