Your Wednesday Dose of Doom and Gloom
We most often hear about the alarming $15.96 trillion national debt (more than 100% of GDP), and the 2012 budget deficit of $1.1 trillion (6.97% of GDP). As dangerous as those numbers are, they do not begin to tell the story of the federal government’s true liabilities.
The actual liabilities of the federal government—including Social Security, Medicare, and federal employees’ future retirement benefits—already exceed $86.8 trillion, or 550% of GDP. For the year ending Dec. 31, 2011, the annual accrued expense of Medicare and Social Security was $7 trillion. Nothing like that figure is used in calculating the deficit. In reality, the reported budget deficit is less than one-fifth of the more accurate figure.
I’m not actually worried about it. Washington is going to hit the wall — fall off the cliff, set its hair on fire, whatever — long before those other bills come due.
Already it’s safe to say there’s no market for the amount of debt Washington is already issuing. Last year the Fed, the lender of last resort, bought up three-quarters of all of DC’s new debt. 77%. It will do about the same this year.
It used to be that when Congress wanted to borrow money, it went hat-in-hand to America’s savers. But Americans stopped saving enough for DC’s appetites, so Congress went to Japan to borrow, then to China. And since Japan and China had to do something with all those dollars they’d gotten from selling us cars and consumer electronics, why not?
These days Japan has troubles of its own, and China seems somewhat less interested in buying securities with a payout lower than the rate of inflation. Go figure.
But fear not! Congress need not go hat in hand to anyone, so long as Ben Bernanke is willing to run the printing presses and use his Make Believe Dollars to buy all the real debt Congress and the president can dream up. And inflation remains low (except for buyers of food and fuel and other exotic goods) because nobody in the private sector is doing much buying. They’re staying hunkered down, trying to avoid being beaten by ObamaCare and the EPA and reenergized union thugs.
It’s further down the line where things get really interesting.
As previously noted, there is not enough demand in the whole entire world for all the new debt we produce each year — but at least it’s cheaper than producing oil pipelines, right? Anyway. There also exists no politically feasible plan for getting our deficits very much under a trillion dollars a year, every year, for as far as the eye can see. Yes, unemployment checks aren’t going out with the same happy ferocity they were a couple of years ago, but entitlement spending is going nowhere but up. And eventually, Uncle Ben is going to have to stop conjuring up Make Believe Dollars.
Because eventually the economy will pick up some steam. It’s at that point that Uncle Ben has to start selling bonds, to hoover up all those Make Believe Dollars he’s been injecting into the economy. If he doesn’t, they’ll run around in their trillions, chasing the same number of goods. This is what we call “nasty inflation.”
But Congress will still want to sell its trillion dollars worth of debt each year, right up against Uncle Ben’s Crazy Treasury Fire Sale.
Let’s assume all this happens about four years from now. By then, we’ll already have outstanding debts of about $20 trillion. And most of that debt is in short term treasuries of two- or three-year maturities. Now, as that debt matures, we can do one of two things. We can roll it over into new debt (refinance), or we can pay it off and send folks home with oodles of cash money.
Stop laughing. We could so pay it off. In some other reality.
Last year we had to refi almost three trillion in existing debt, on top of the trillion in new debt Congress created. So when we get to this next part, I want you to remember that there is already no market big enough to gobble up four trillion dollars in US debt. It doesn’t exist.
When and if that recovery comes, we’ll have Congress still trying to scare up buyers for a trillion dollars in debt each year. We’ll have the Fed trying to unload some unspecified number of trillions — nobody other than The Bearded One is allowed to know that number — in fairly short order. And we’ll have the Treasury trying to refi three, four trillion or more dollars, each and every year.
In a global marketplace that could only buy (or re-fi) a little over three trillion dollars, we’ll have to find the wherewithal to soak up five or six trillion dollars.
Hey, buyer’s market! Think of it — the Treasury, the Fed, Congress, all trying to sell you trillions. They’ll really have to jack up interest rates, won’t they? treasuries you wouldn’t sniff at when they paid out 2% start looking pretty good at 4%, don’t they?
Oh, wait… that’s only for the new debt Congress issues, and for the old debt being re-financed. What about the trillions Ben needs to unload?
Well, kids, here’s where we need a very quick lesson on how bond markets work. A bond pays out a fixed interest rate, no matter who holds it. So let’s say I paid face value for a $100 treasury paying 2%. My $100 investment pays me $2 every year. (Actually, every 360 days — but that’s another lesson.) Now I want to sell that instrument, but interest rates have doubled to 4%. Who’s going to buy my old $100 at 2%, when they can buy a shiny new $100 bond at 4%? Well, nobody. Nobody would be willing to buy at face value.
Instead I offer to sell you my $100 bond for $50. The bond still pays the same $2 a year to you, even though you bought it at half price. And a $100 at 2% bond you bought on the secondary market for $50, gives you the same rate of return as a new $100 at 4% bought at face value.
Ben needs to sell old debt. Tim Geithner at Treasury needs to refi existing debt. Congress needs to issue new debt.
Congress will be the ones offering jacked up interest rates. Ben and Timmy will be the ones offering steep discounts. And this is where the whole system breaks down.
Ben’s problem is the discount he’ll have to offer. If rates really do double to 4% (which is historically still quite low) he won’t be able to take all of his Make Believe Dollars out of circulation. In fact, he’ll only be able to soak up about half of them. Say hello to my leetle fren, inflation.
Tim has a different problem. He’ll soak up some of the Make Believe Dollars that Ben missed. So we have that going for us, which is nice. But the new treasuries he issues in their place will have to offer the same 4% rate being offered on the new debt. And with inflation becoming a problem, that 4% rate won’t last for long — it will have to go up to 5% in short order, and we could see 10% or higher, if inflation really kicks in.
And this starts to do very nasty things to our national balance sheet. Last year, we spent about $225 billion financing our existing debt. That is, paying out those $2 to everybody holding a $100 bond. Over the next four years, that will rise to nearly $300 billion, even with interest rates staying the same. That’s about half of what we spend on defense.
As interest rates rise, so does the vig Congress has to come up with every year. At 5%, interest on the debt eclipses all of defense spending, and starts to equal Social Security. Or Medicare/Medicaid combined. It might even dwarf ObamaCare.
But we haven’t gotten to the worst part.
Yes, interest rates need to go up to stave off inflation. Interest on new debt issuance must also go up, to attract buyers.
“But,” you might ask, “didn’t we already discuss that fact that there already aren’t enough buyers?”
Yes, yes we did. But you can always find a buyer — at the right price. And that’s going to put additional downward pressure on the price Bernanke gets for his old debt. It’s also going to put additional upward pressure on the interest paid on new debt.
Bernanke might be selling for pennies on the dollars. Congress might have to pay 20%, and interest consumes ever-larger chunks of the budget. There comes a point where people simply stop buying, because they don’t believe that the debt at those prices can be honored.
Which brings us to massive inflation because Ben can’t sell, and national bankruptcy because Congress can’t borrow.
There’s a word for that situation: Greece.
And the only thing that has to happen for all of this to come true … is pretty much nothing. This is money already spent. These are programs already mandated. It’s baked in.
We can’t tax our way out of it, because there aren’t enough millionaires and billionaires. We can’t borrow out way out, because we ran out of lenders years ago. The best we can hope for is that the Fed manages to keep inflation relatively tame. That is, 10% for four years. And that rate for that duration cuts the value of the dollar by about half.
Yes, Bernanke will chop the top off of your savings. But he’ll also wrangle that $20 trillion in debt down to a more manageable $10 trillion, so that Congress can keep paying out the goodies to the voters who don’t possess any savings.
And those voters outnumber you and are more politically active than you — that was proven decisively three weeks ago. If you receive benefits, it doesn’t matter if a Big Mac costs $12, provided your benefits are indexed to inflation (and they are).
But you, you poor sap who set aside something for retirement or for a rainy day…
…it’s the destruction of your savings that will make it possible for some other guy to pay $12 for that Big Mac. Because it’s either that, or Greece. Or Zimbabwe. Or worse.
That’s the real fiscal cliff, and we’ve been puttering towards it now for a long time. The only question remaining is if we keep puttering, or if we hit the gas.






Congrats, Stephen, you win the Mark Steyn award of the day.
Thank you.
But I don’t want it!
And also thank you.
Actually, my best analysis is that it’s worse than you think, Stephen.
The “good” news is that, contra your analysis, we don’t have to worry about demand-led inflation due to economic growth for at least 10 years, when the demographics shift to favor household formation by young people over the Boomer retirements.
The bad news is that the Boomers can cause inflation all by themselves, even without GDP growth, as they retire.
Your debt/GDP calculations are too pessimistic. If those numbers were what mattered, we’d already be hosed. What matters is publicly held debt to GDP, since that’s what the Treasury pays taxes on. Currently, that’s at about 70%, not accounting for Fed-held debt.
What’s actually going to trip us up is that with new federal taxes and regulations in energy, healthcare and financial services starting to really bite, productivity is going to start to lag. That means fewer, more expensive goods and services. At the same time, you have massive numbers of new retirees. Now, those retirees will do two things: stop saving, and start spending their SS/Medicare benefits.
Currently, demand for savings is through the roof, but as retirees stop saving demand for dollars will go down. Because those benefits can only be paid by the Fed’s printing press, supply of dollars will go up.
You do the math.
My most optimistic guess is that we’ve got five years before a currency crisis takes hold (as Boomer retirements really kick in, after five years of zero economic growth in real terms). My pessimistic guess? One year, give or take two months–shortly after the publicly-held debt to GDP ratio goes north of 80% and interest rates begin their upward march.
Oh, and I wouldn’t expect inflation-indexed benefits to be worth a darn. The government calculates the CPI, after all.
This is where IPAB comes in to save the day, though. Social Security only pays out to living people; dead Boomers don’t collect.
Heh.
Most likely that was the entire point of “Obamacare” – stealth euthanasia of older people to get them out of the way.
Stephanie Pomboy in a July Barrons interview (subscribers only, sorry http://online.barrons.com/article/SB50001424053111904346504577531052271788084.html#articleTabs_article%3D0) predicted the end of fiat money will be coming probably within 5 years: “We are going back to hard money, rather than a fiat system where debtors can silently default by inflating their debts away.”
What would this mean for the entitlement state we have today? I dunno – the best case is that we will have a complete re-evaluation of what is actually necessary spending – no more green energy boondoggles and maybe even a Washington DC about 1/4 the size of today’s. At worst, well, Zimbabwe awaits.
The next big market crash will take gold and silver down as well. It would be prudent to have cash set aside to buy hard money during the short period it will be cheap. Junior miniig stocks will also be a bargain. We might have seen some growth with Romney, but we are all sliding down the rabbit hole behind Alice now. With luck, Jorma will bring his guitar, Jack, his bass. Maybe Grace will take requests.
Lead from behind!
If it comes to this bullet proof vests and fish hooks will be of greater value.
Ammo is useful, compact, stable for decades when stored properly, and (as anyone who has been watching prices for the last 20 years knows) holds it’s value very well.
Lead – its the new gold…
You all are more knowledgeable than I about the economy. Stephen’s explanation is very, very good. Remember what Reagan said – - – “Inflation is as violent as a mugger, as frightening as an armed robber and as deadly as a hit man.”
This is what inflation looks like in real life.
“We can’t tax our way out of it, because there aren’t enough millionaires and billionaires.”
Ahh, Stephen, Stephen, Stephen.
In our Greece, we will live a Spartan existence? Or, in other words, come back with your yield or upon it?
You clearly think too clearly.
There are not enough “filthy rich”, so the OWS crowd (One World Socialists) will begin to demand “world payoffs” for making ANY money or having ANY wealth.
The French took their finger out of the dike when they elected Hollande.
We, lost our collective marbles when we re-elected a guy who has us racing toward oblivion in his Big Wheel golf cart.
75% tax rates on the rich are no longer out of the conversation. And by WORLD standards…the definition of “rich” American is going to rival Joan Rivers and Heidi Montag for most atrocious makeovers. One World Socialists are going to take their carbon footprint and put it up our assets.
“…we re-elected a guy who has us racing toward oblivion in his Big Wheel golf cart.
Now that is funny right there! You made my day with that one. That is the funniest thing I have read on this blog site since the description of the environmental crowd as being the “Gang Green”.
I just wish these apt descriptions weren’t so close to the truth.
“We, lost our collective marbles when we re-elected a guy who has us racing toward oblivion in his Big Wheel golf cart.”
That was the funniest thing I have read since the election. Thanks!
Sheesh. PJM doesn’t post my comment for 20 minutes and then doesn’t post my second try for a comment and now I come back to this six hours later and both comments are posted. Sorry everyone had to read two posts when I only intended one. See ya.
That sucks. BTW, how’s Tammy Fay ?
Ah, are you getting the “slow down! You already posted three hours ago!” too?
It’s just a glitch. If you click “Submit Comment” again, it’ll work.
Since entitlements are indexed to inflation, and entitlements drive our deficit, doesn’t that mean our deficit is essentially indexed to inflation? Isn’t the benefit received by inflating $20 trillion of debt to $10 trillion largely offset by the deficit going from $1 trillion per year to $2 trillion?
Entitlements are indexed to the CPI. Guess who calculates the CPI?
If the CPI doesn’t match real inflation then the takers will feel some economic pain. They’ll push for an adjustment to maintain their standard of living. The Democrats run the risk of them sitting home on election day, or even looking into caring for themselves.
CPI-based cost-of-living adjustments will not keep up with inflation, but they will probably amount to something. Social Security recipients and retired government employees will correctly perceive that they are coming out way ahead of the children and grandchildren with stagnant wages, and vote to continue cannibalizing the economy.
In other words, they’ll just print enough money to cover the deficit plus some extra to cover the COLA. If you’re not first in line for the new money, you’re screwed.
Youre screwed either way, the new money will be the mark of the beast.
Well Steve, aren’t you just one big ‘ole ray of frickin sunshine.
This article is yet another big push for me to embrace my “spend my money now while it’s still worth something” plan.
I’m 48, so I’m not too upset for myself. I feel sorry for the kids who are going to inherit this clusterfrak.
I don’t feel sorry for them in the least. They put the jerk in office, let them suffer for it. Maybe they will learn something – God knows they won’t learn anything in government schools.
“F… it, Dude. Let’s go Bowling.”
“But you, you poor sap who set aside something for retirement or for a rainy day…”
Advice to same, good until the tumbrels roll…
T.I.P.S.
Then there is the manufacturing productivity problem. Tax policy penalizes money spent on capital goods, research, development, and hard goods inventory in the US. No possibility then to really grow the economy and increase tax revenue. I guess about every three generations the lesson that you can’t tax your way to wealth is the minimum amount of time to teach that lesson. Instead of the Laffer Curve it should be called the Laughter Curve, dark laughter, very dark. Something for Nothing will always find those who will sell their souls for it.
So wait then; what’s the solution? Are there private buyers’ clubs or some secret organizations that one could join to weather the storm?
There isn’t a solution. That’s the point. You can’t even leave–the IRS will still come after you.
All we can do is hope that “Americans can always be counted on to do the right thing…after they have exhausted all other possibilities.”
While your money still has value, exchange it for wealth, in forms
easy to hide and/or difficult to confiscate, and move to a Red State.
This is the one part of this whole explanation where I’m still admittedly a little confused. I get that the real value of the debt will be $10 T in today’s dollars. But it’ll still be $20 T on the books, right? Are you saying that the actual amount of the Debt will only be $10 T? How will inflation have allowed Uncle Ben to pay off $10 T of that?
I’m self-taught in a lot of economics, and understand quite a bit. But every-once-in-a-while, I get lost in the weeds. If there’s a clear explanation for what you’re positing above, I’d love to see it.
Math allowed. Numbers don’t scare me. I just need to grasp the mechanics behind them.
The $20T remains. Its value in today’s dollars is cut in half.
K. That’s what I thought. Guess I was trying to read too much into what you were saying.
Sort of like owing someone $100 in hyperinflation pre-war Germany. Wait a day and pay them with a grain of rice.
Cigarettes were better than gold.
Okay, Stephen, assuming this plays out as you say, where is safety? What investments preserve asset value in this environment? This will be done by some, as you know: How?
I’m stocking up on ammo and food and long-shelflife batteries.
Heh. Well that’s a start, sure enough. But, I think Blankfine, Timmy and even the Beard will have a plan besides that…though I’d like to see the Beard decked out in a bandolier.
water filtration, trancievers, bicycles and motorbikes, and defensible position land improvements
Condoms and single malt scotch.
You forgot Hersey bars and nylons.
roflmao! Now we’ll all know who you really are on Bartering Days..
Two little words: mining and agriculture. Foreigners will trade off their rapidly depreciating reserve currency for agricultural and industrial commodities.
Asians are already investing in US real estate.
Too bad the Feds will not allow them to profit.
I recommend John T. Reed for the most intelligent analysis I have found on how to protect what you have. None of that bunker stuff. And he is not a gold bug — he makes several good arguments against it.
Here is one of his articles to get you started: http://www.johntreed.com/Inflationhedgecountries.html
There is a link there to his page about his Hyperinflation book. On that page if you scroll down you can find a list of articles about hyperinflation what you can do about it (Hint: foreign currencies). Don’t be put off by the poor web design — his writing and thinking are solid.
Thanks Randy.
This would be a good time to MOVE.
Might as well go before it’s too late.
Agriculture? Haven’t you hear about the drought? No water, no agriculture and if you have water then the states will take it from you and give it to the cities and power companies and your agriculture can suck the hind tit!
It is time to put a stop to the idiots who pretend to be economists and continue to print money. Hyper-inflation is the end result and where you put your money you still will take it in the shorts. Believe that the politician will not be hurt one little bit from this economic foolishness. Wake up America!
Well, I would have suggested buying bonds from the water utility but the bond market promises to be kinda sucky. You could also buy stock in a power company but they have to generate electricity by burning coal, oil or gas which are all…ahem, industrial commodities.
Maybe we could just load up on NoDoz and megaphones and run around hollering “Wake up America!”
I bought my first megaphone for use at Tea Party protests, a couple of years ago.
It hasnt been that effective yet. But I will continue as a foot soldier for liberty.
I salute your effort but will offer no suggestion as to how you may improve your success rate. Inflation is the opiate of the masses and you will never rouse them from their dogmatic slumber.
“Inflation is the opiate of the masses and you will never rouse them from their dogmatic slumber.”
And once the day arrives, we’ll find the imaginary flowers on our chains to have wilted away only to continue to bear the chains but without the fantasy or the consolation.
Agriculture, as in grow your own, and prepare to defend it.
Food will be currency in a collapsed economy.
Fruits/vegetables, meat (chicken, lamb etc), honey will be used to trade for other goods not available. Mechanic services, doctoring, clothing etc in exchange for food.
If you live in the country, get your farmstead going, if you live int he city, find a way to trade for food from the farmers.
The Big Squeeze. Be prepared.
The way this ends for the “red” states is through secession, after which the insane financial burdens of an out-of-control anti-Constitutional government are cast aside and left behind and a new Constitutional Republic of “red” states is established. The way it ends for the “blue” states is through societal collapse, anarchy and chaos, after which a Somalia-, Zimbabwe- and Rwanda-like bloodbath ensues. Justice will not be denied…
No, that sounds too optimistic, in my view.
Actually, there is an interesting point here. If the US “peacefully splits” (fat chance), how would the debt burden be split up?
Instant war, methinks.
That war wont just be the Red States and Blue States either.
There will not be a second Civil War because the Feds will find
that the US military is still loyal to the Constitution, not the
administration; One more reason Federalism is better than Secession.
The Red States can ensure that loyalty favors them by offering
help and a home to ex-military personnel – and their families -
abandoned by federal cost-cutters and stranded in failed Blue States.
Your comment actually makes more sense as a justification for secession, rather than federalism. If the military is assumed to remain loyal to the Constitution, then they would likely side with the “red” states that seek to reestablish the Constitutional Republic than with the “blue” states that have gone full-blown tyrannical communist and over to the dark side, just as you point out that the “red” states would become a haven for military personnel, both active and veterans. The “blue” states would quickly devolve into a paganistic jungle of Mad Max psychopaths that is fully in keeping with their anarchical and thuggish predilections, literally preying on their own. There is a risk, though, that as the “red” states repudiate the illegitimate debt burdens created by an out-of-control anti-Constitutional federal government that is left behind, the foreign countries that are owed the debt, like China, could come after it by attempting to invade what’s left of the old US to recover their lost investments. We’ll just have to make sure that the “red” states lay claim to their rightful military assets to protect themselves and use the “blue” states as a buffer zone and a killing field. Anyway, I can dream, can’t I? What else is left…
Blue states will buy China off by selling them a million women (I heard a little bit this year about how blue state women have vaginas, which are decidedly in short supply in China)
The problem of the debt burden resolution would pale by comparison with the problem of Blue State to Red State illegal immigration.
The difference about a second civil war would be that both sides would have nukes. Since the succeeding states would only have to play defense, they would have an inherent advantage here. They could just say: “We’re leaving, invade us and we’ll nuke your cities.” That would leave the feds in a pretty pickle because the ball would be in their court, it would be incumbent on them to pull the trigger. If a nuclear exchange ensued then the states they reconquered would be radioactive wastelands anyway, so they have no possibility of recapturing the assents they wish to, even if they “win”. Furthermore, if the threat were made public, how many citizens of New York, or DC, or LA etc would want to risk getting vaporized just to keep a bunch of people they hate anyway in the union? They’d probably rather just say good riddance.
Interesting.
Then we could sort out the populations with most black Americans and illegal Hispanics moving to Blue States and a lot of rural conservatives moving to Red States in the initial transfer.
Then seal the borders and let the Lefty’s suffer their own policies without interference from racist old white men and Christians.
Nukes, or any other kind of bomb, are a threat to densely populated areas more than rural. So the only places in red states that a nuke would kill large numbers of people, are the big cities. Which are essentially holding pens for blue-staters in red states anyway.
Secession again. You can’t secede from your own state, county, neighborhood. The red/blue line runs through states and families, not just between the left coast and the west, the north-east and the south. We work this out between ourselves, or fight it out. Nobody wins in a fight like that.
P.S. Government, at least the Feds, aren’t going to be much help.
“Debts which CANNOT be repaid, won’t be”.
“The problem with socialism is eventually you run out of other peoples money”.
“Change has come to America”.
“Democracy is the theory that the people get exactly what they voted for good and hard”.
Actually I’m predicting that the gov’mint will nationalize the IRA’s, 40lK’s and other private monies. After all, its not “fair” that you have them and poor people don’t. It where they can get a great, big pot of money to pay off the debt. And don’t think the Supremes will save you. They didn’t save the GM & Chrysler bond holders; I doubt they would save us.
And stock up on food, lead, and defense. For when the rabble runs out of potato chips, they’ll come looking for your stuff. Personally I’m ready to leave the country, but I can’t get my husband to go.
I am considering trading some of my 401K monies for property in Canada. Given that their housing market has been stable, while ours imploded, that means prices seem high. But, such might be a good move in addition to stockpiling food, etc.
The only problem with that is that there are some pretty strict gun laws in Canada. When the looters come streaming out of the cities, you’ll need those to stand a chance.
PattyMor – That is EXACTLY what will happen. After all Pelosi and Reid have mentioned this idea in the past when they are passing legislation they have not read.
In many ways the Obama administration is the re-incarnation of Juan Peron of Argentina fame. It is following the same playbook and is getting the same economic results as well.
Use whatever space you have to grow your own food. Not just a vegetable garden, but fruit trees and herbs. I bet most people could walk through my yard and have no idea what is actually edible. The champion for easy-to- grow and ridiculously productive is the sweet potato. You can even use the new leaves and tips like spinach, and of course save some for the next year’s planting. There are varieties that grow well in about every climate.
On savings: By purchasing what you know your family will need, whenever you can find a particularly good price, you come out better than if the money was sitting in a savings account. We did the math last year. If we had purchased the same items mere months after the actual purchase, we would have paid substantially more. Obviously, this is only a saving if it is items you are certain to buy anyway.
As for inflation, I believe they will merely find new tricks to show inflation is not as high as anyone who shops knows that it is. They cannot possibly adjust SS using honest inflation numbers.
This is the sort of thing Republicans and Romney types obsess about. That’s why they lost.
Now, WHERE’s MY IPAD??!!! Damnit. All the rich people have dozens of them. I want mine NOW.
Can you eat and get nourishment from an IPAD or use it to successfully defend yourself or your family, or warm your self on cold days or cool you self on hot days what good is it when you have no roof over your head and people are trying to take what stuff you have? It is just a worthless object and by the way there will be no internet to browse cause there will be no electricity or potable water unless you know how to make your own. You will not last very long in the coming disaster, it must suck to be you!
Looking a bit more closely at this situation, there are other actions Uncle Ben will more likely take first. Initially, he will yank back from the banks that trillion he lodged with them to scare off the fear of a run on the banks at the height of the banking crisis that started the Obama Years. And/or he will increase the special interest rate the Fed presently pays the banks to hold onto that money and NOT loan it out to resurging businesses (under the assumption of a sort-of recovery). The effective result will be to prevent that trillion from making it into the economy, and to tamp down the fire of the recovery by restricting loans to businesses that want to expand. But when that proves insufficient to tame the inflationary fires, as it will, the Fed has other tools to bring the economy to its knees. It can increase interest rates that are charged to the so-called private banks (though these days no bank is really private anymore) for extremely short term loans, which drives up costs and hence commercial interest rates for longer term loans… except that banks are making so much money on government handouts (like that interest paid to just hold onto the trillion they were given to bolster their liquidity, mentioned above) that raising those extremely short term rates won’t have as much impact is it used to, so the inflationary fires will not be as moderated as the Fed at first expects. And the surviving businesses are generally now cash-rich, having been prudent during the downturn by laying off workers before the last crunch really hit, so they can expand without bank loans, which will keep the inflationary fires fanned, at least for a short while at the start of the sort-of recovery.
If inflation rises significantly, Ben will be forced to “take action,” but the above acts will suffice as political cover in the short term. Ben may believe that he can stop inflation eventually by keeping a lid on the recovery without selling a tanker ship full of Treasury notes at reduced prices. He may be willing (for us) to suffer the initial bout of inflation, until the businesses run down their cash reserves. In the meanwhile, the regulatory arms of the Obama Administration may be silently unleashed to do what they can to slow the recovery, if their previous actions to that point have not proven sufficient. Never let a crisis go to waste. We may see the first of many new “capital controls” enacted to counter the “excesses of Wall Street” while deftly crafting back door exits for their cronies. Fear may be enough to keep the recovery within frog-on-a-hot-plate limits. All the while Obama will be exhorting business to rise to the challenge…
I simply cannot believe that Ben would blithely try to soak up excess liquidity by holding a “Fire Sale” on Treasury notes. The immediate consequences are too violent to the fragile economic balancing act he has supported lo these many years. The world has gone a bit nuts for the “safe haven” of US Gov’t Treasury Bonds, enough to buy 23% of the notes offered at auction (the flip side of that 77% figure). Ben wants that insanity to continue through the starting phase of the sort-of recovery, and beyond. It will be obvious to him that if he were to try to offer a bunch of Treasuries to transform cash into debt and thereby remove it from the marketplace and thus fight inflation, that 77% figure would have to rise dramatically, or the price of the bonds would have to drop significantly. Both are anathema to him.
Ben’s initial stratagems will ultimately fail. Bad inflation will occur, despite his best Keynesian efforts to control it with the normal levers. But I don’t see him taking desperate action until much later… in the endgame.
Ben wants out, and will be leaving shortly.
Perhaps he can write a expose on the Obama Administration economic policy.
“Perhaps he can write a expose on the Obama Administration economic policy.”
Unless he wants to suffer an untimely demise like Breitbart, he’ll avoid doing that, or at least avoid revealing too much of the likely truth.
Ben is a willing participant, he’s all in.
“[H]e will yank back from the banks that trillion he lodged with them to scare off the fear of a run on the banks at the height of the banking crisis that started the Obama Years.”
You have it backward. Banks got US Treasuries in exchange for the face value of their CDOs and MBS. (These are damaged assets and cannot be sold without the FED taking a massive haircut.) Banks took their TARP money and bond coupon payments and deposited them at the FED. Their reserve assets there are at an all-time high.
“[H]e will increase the special interest rate the Fed presently pays the banks to hold onto that money and NOT loan it out to resurging businesses.
The fee paid to banks for overnight loans is known as the “discount rate”. Any rise in the discount rate will push up long-term rates, as well. This would stall out any hope of a real estate recovery.
Also, rising interest rates have an opportunity cost. As entrepreneurs have to allocate more revenue to cover their capital costs, they have less remaining revenue to allocate to “land” and labor. When there are fewer bids for labor, wages stagnate, which will prolong the unemployment problem.
In response to persistent unemployment, wage and price controls may be implemented so that inflation can erode real wage rates. This will cripple those at the lower end of the financial spectrum who voted for a continuation of Obama’s policies. This will require more food stamps. Congress will be unable to cover the increased demand from their available tax receipts so the FED will oblige by printing more money.
This will end badly.
By my understanding, the assets that the banks keep with the Fed are called “excess reserves”, and they presently amount to over a trillion dollars. The Fed pays the banks for not loaning it out. That it sits with the Fed is immaterial, it’s all just digits anyways. That it came from troubled assets is secondary to its danger for inflation. If the banks want to create loans, it’s useful as collateral. It is intended as liquidity in case a run on the banks were to occur, and thus is available to the banks as they need it. This is separate from the overnight discount rate.
I now regret my decision to study economics under the superb tutelage of Professor Hans Sennholtz, one of only four men to be recognized with a PhD by Austrian economist Ludwig von Mises.
It would have been cheaper and easier for me to be schooled by you instead.
Yikes! It sounds like the best case scenario to erase debt is the end of the world scenario on Dec. 21st. Since the world is hooked up to the dollar, can we project a global economic meltdown with no predictable value for any given currency?
Electronic fiat money replaced gold and durable commodities. The election went dense metro against rural, so the joke is on them who went govt. dependent.
“it’s the destruction of your savings that will make it possible for some other guy to pay $12 for that Big Mac. Because it’s either that, or Greece. Or Zimbabwe. Or worse.”
People don’t really realize the pain that is waiting for us by 2016. And this is just the Federal debt. What happens when some of these big states like California, New York, and Illinois start going under and need help, and I mean serious help, from the Federal Government? We have states that are about to fall like dominos and no clue how to pay for it all. Just wait and see the civil unrest when California lets all its citizens know that it doesn’t have any more money to meet its payroll or that ALL of the pensions in California are going bust. You thought the Rodney King riots were bad in Los Angeles? Just you wait. And as society breaks down and civil unrest picks up, just wait and see what the mob does to whoever they think is “rich.” It may not end up as bad as the French Revolution, but anybody who lived through the Rodney King riots probably thought that it came darn close to it.
But, hey, Obama and Pelosi and Reid could care less. Just spend some more money. Go for what the liberals call “growth,” which is just another term for more government spending. Well, we tried that already with the “stimulus,” remember? And how did that work out for us? We lost almost $1 trillion.
No wonder gun sales are skyrocketing. People know what’s coming. Too bad Obama and his minions don’t. Well, maybe they do, they just don’t care.
I’d like to think California, NY, and Illinois will hit the wall hard but I think it is not going to happen. Even should a law be passed preventing Congress from bailing them out, they still will be bailed out. All that will happen is the Federal Reserve, on their own initiative, will buy the state bonds issued by these states, just like they buy National Bonds now from the Treasury. Presto – there is the bail out.
What happens when some of these big states like California, New York, and Illinois start going under and need help, and I mean serious help, from the Federal Government?
I’m thinking something along the lines of Thunderdome, featuring the Senators from those states.
The state with the winning delegation gets bailed out.
This scares me spitless. My grandparents have a farm (score!) and the hubby and I are learning how to plow and plant this spring. I fear for my children…
Dont forget that you are going to have to defend your crops as well. The Zombie Apocalypse. Youre gonna need quite a few hands to fend off the Zombies and grow your food.
Excellent life skills to learn! But…remember the kulaks, and pray they don’t come for the farmers too. Realize: having food when they don’t is “unfair”.
Yeah, we’re teaching the boys to shoot this weekend too.
That’s a fairly honest assessment, Mr. Green.
I’d hammer on the idea that neither party is going to try to fix it. In fact, at this point, it’s pretty much unfixable. One side won’t give up on welfare spending, while the other won’t give up military spending, just for one example. Both sides spend more money than we get…and neither one is willing to stop.
Truly, if we stopped doing everything wrong, right this instant, life, as we know it, would collapse, anyway. Everything, to coin a phrase, is keyed on Keynes. If we do what is necessary, that is, give up on Keynes right here and now, everything crashes and burns. (We didn’t get here, overnight.) If we don’t give up on Keynes, everything crashes and burns, anyway.
The only thing we can really do, at this point, is to wait and see how high the body count is, once the inevitable crash and burn is finished.
…In the long run we are all dead.
-John Maynard Keynes
America’s True National Debt: $87 Trillion Guy Benson Political Editor
http://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/2012/11/28/americas_true_national_debt_87_trillion
So what Obama must do is prevent any economic recovery for the next 4 years. Then the Democrats stay home in 2016 and a Republican gets elected. Then the Republicans get blamed again when it hits the fan.
Bingo!
Indeed, there is so much money with the banks now that any significant recovery will lead to instant hyper-inflation. That situation will be only worse in four years time – now the earliest possible date for a recovery.
I say we just print several more trillion bucks and spend it all on an insane military buildup of say 30 more carriers, 500 more ships, quadruple the size of the infantry, at least 2000 new aircraft and about 5000 new drones. That might do it. After we get that in full swing we just declare that there never really was any debt to pay and we don’t owe anyone anything. We could be sort of like the bully who stole everyone’s milk money on the school yard and got away with it most of the time. Who would try to come collecting from us? Okay, I am ashamed of myself. It was a bad idea, I’m sure.
A sobering analysis from the Vodkapundit.
Your concern for the future is justified. When the Feds don’t count food and fuel in the inflation rate, something bad is happening.
Anyway, I now curse daily those SOB politicians who have gotten us into this mess, especially FDR and LBJ and G W Bush. Social Security was supposed to be a fund. We’d give money to the Feds and they would save it for us. Now the money is gone, used to build bridges to nowhere, and to find out how dolphins communicate.
Due to inflation and paltry interest rates, my savings erode daily. If the stock market collapses and bond debtors start to default, I’ll be in some serious doo-doo. And right around that time, the government checks should stop rolling in. Done, over and out. See ya. (At least I’ll still have my home. Maybe.)
This morning’s above-the-fold WSJ headline is Fed Stimulus Likely in 2013. Reading further, I learn that While Fed officials have been encouraged by progress in the housing and banking recoveries, business uncertainty and hiring restraint are still holding back growth. Damn businesses.
Apparently they were easily spooked by the election, as I learn in Section B: Election Dampens Optimism, e.g. The results of the presidential election dampened the spirits of many small-business owners… A drop in optimism compared with the months leading up to the election… One business owner was “despondent” in the days following the election. It’s in the sixth paragraph, and the sixth paragraph only, that we get a mention that small-business owners are anticipating higher taxes under President Obama.
Back in section A of the WSJ, David Wessel’s CAPITAL column describes the Fed’s Bond-Buying Binge’s Hidden Benefit, which is, according to Fed Governor Jeremy Stein, a good thing from a financial-stability perspective.
Furthermore, the Economy Is Growing Modestly, Fed Finds.
So, Stephen Green, you are All Wet.
EAT MOR SPENDING!
Time to get out of debt, then acquire tools and technical skills. Prepare to live under the barter economy.
It’s interesting that Mr. Obama does not believe American can “drill our way out of it” relative to energy, but America can most definitely TAX its way out of this deficit.
You will not get far on the backs of the poor or even the rich if you took everything they owned! You might get a few days of funding, and thats it!
US Fiscal Cliff Talks Target the Working Class By Barry Grey Global Research, November 29, 2012
http://www.globalresearch.ca/us-fiscal-cliff-talks-target-the-working-class/5313501