You’d expect that to be an ad against a Democrat opponent, but it’s actually against Repub opponent Sean Bielat. (He seems to consider Elizabeth Childs a non-factor.)
Another thing. I might be confusing David Steinhof with another candidate, but I could swear this candidate’s statement on abortion has shifted slightly. If it’s the same guy I’m thinking of, he once presented the same position on abortion that he has on gay marriage — roughly, “against my religion but I wouldn’t outlaw it.” The wording on his site is now a little different. He now says he’s against the practice and he won’t vote to fund Planned Parenthood or other organizations that provide abortion on demand — which is arguably a money issue that pro-choice Tea Partiers would agree with. It makes me think some hard-core Party folks got to him.
Although he hides it on his web site, I eventually found a page that states that he is Republican.
But he seems to be ashamed of the fact.
For that reason, I have doubts about him.
Of course he’s hiding his party affiliation. He’s in the Volksrepublic of Massachusetts. The first thing a majority of voters check is party affiliation and then, it he’s a dem, his message. If he forces the message first maybe they’ll actually rub two brain cells together and think for a second.
Judging from the current state of affairs in MA-4 voters are checking A) party affiliation (Democrat) and then B) Last Name (Kennedy).
Joe Jr. Jr. is probably going to walk away with this seat despite having almost no experience doing anything besides being a grandson of Bobby and benefitting greatly from Joe Jr’s connections to Hugo Chavez.
great ad. hope he mean’s what he said.
Unlike our more recent representation this fellow actually sounds like he lives around these parts!
Which tribe does he identify with?
I still say the Biden ad is better. It had more LULZ.
Interesting.
You’d expect that to be an ad against a Democrat opponent, but it’s actually against Repub opponent Sean Bielat. (He seems to consider Elizabeth Childs a non-factor.)
Another thing. I might be confusing David Steinhof with another candidate, but I could swear this candidate’s statement on abortion has shifted slightly. If it’s the same guy I’m thinking of, he once presented the same position on abortion that he has on gay marriage — roughly, “against my religion but I wouldn’t outlaw it.” The wording on his site is now a little different. He now says he’s against the practice and he won’t vote to fund Planned Parenthood or other organizations that provide abortion on demand — which is arguably a money issue that pro-choice Tea Partiers would agree with. It makes me think some hard-core Party folks got to him.
The guy has a powerful ad focusing on the heartbreak wrought by the dirtsack economy and you want to talk about abortion and gay marraige?
What, is that all I talked about?
Pretty much. It was 80+% of the words in your comment.
david steinhof saying that he wants to “send david steinhof” to congress kinda freaks me out. why couldn’t he say “send ME” ?
Although he hides it on his web site, I eventually found a page that states that he is Republican.
But he seems to be ashamed of the fact.
For that reason, I have doubts about him.
Of course he’s hiding his party affiliation. He’s in the Volksrepublic of Massachusetts. The first thing a majority of voters check is party affiliation and then, it he’s a dem, his message. If he forces the message first maybe they’ll actually rub two brain cells together and think for a second.
Of course, he doesn’t stand a chance.
Judging from the current state of affairs in MA-4 voters are checking A) party affiliation (Democrat) and then B) Last Name (Kennedy).
Joe Jr. Jr. is probably going to walk away with this seat despite having almost no experience doing anything besides being a grandson of Bobby and benefitting greatly from Joe Jr’s connections to Hugo Chavez.