Get PJ Media on your Apple

The PJ Tatler

by
Bryan Preston

Bio

March 28, 2014 - 12:58 pm
Page 1 of 2  Next ->   View as Single Page

Democrat Rep. Nancy Pelosi just might be a racist monster who wants to murder live children for the sake of eliminating “undesirables.” Why would I say such an outrageous thing? Because Pelosi has accepted an award named for Margaret Sanger. And Margaret Sanger was definitely a racist monster who advocated murdering live children for the sake of eliminating “undesirables.”

Quote:

The most merciful thing that the large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it.

That’s advocating child murder. It’s not racist, but we’re not done.

Sanger considered racial minorities to be “human weeds.” In context, Sanger’s “weeds” quote carries a whiff of the Third Reich.

If plants, and live stock as well, require space and air, sunlight and love, children need them even more. The only real wealth of our country lies in the men and women of the next generation. A farmer would rather produce a thousand thoroughbreds than a million runts.

How are we to breed a race of human thoroughbreds unless we follow the same plan? We must make this country into a garden of children instead of a disorderly back lot overrun with human weeds.

These “human weeds” were, in Sanger’s mind, working-class people, and racial minorities.

Sanger had a plan for weeding out the human race. First, forced sterilization and racial segregation. From Sanger’s Women and the New Race:

[We should] apply a stern and rigid policy of sterilization and segregation to that grade of population whose progeny is tainted, or whose inheritance is such that objectionable traits may be transmitted to offspring.

Sanger also advocated instituting government control over who can and cannot be allowed to have children. From Sanger’s Plan for Peace:

Article 1. The purpose of the American Baby Code shall be to provide for a better distribution of babies… and to protect society against the propagation and increase of the unfit.
Article 4. No woman shall have the legal right to bear a child, and no man shall have the right to become a father, without a permit…
Article 6. No permit for parenthood shall be valid for more than one birth.

Hey, Sanger was “pro-choice,” in a way, as you’ll see on the next page.

Comments are closed.

Top Rated Comments   
"And why is no one in the media asking Pelosi if she agrees with everything that Sanger said and did?"

Because most of them have no idea what Sanger did, said or stood for beyond the availability of contraceptives and abortion. The Left likes it that way.
29 weeks ago
29 weeks ago Link To Comment
Ah yes, "bioethics."

Here's the proper definition of that term: "Giving ourselves permission to kill the inconvenient innocent."
29 weeks ago
29 weeks ago Link To Comment
She has to accept the award before she knows what's in it.
29 weeks ago
29 weeks ago Link To Comment
All Comments   (37)
All Comments   (37)
Sort: Newest Oldest Top Rated
" No woman shall have the legal right to bear a child, and no man shall have the right to become a father, without a permit…"

Sometimes I think this is a good idea. Would reduce a lot of welfare dependency.
29 weeks ago
29 weeks ago Link To Comment
Because deep inside all leftist are racist monsters. It's that simple.
29 weeks ago
29 weeks ago Link To Comment
Not all. There are the simple tools who really do believe CNN is unbiased truth, they are creating all this mess "for the children", and that if you disagree, you are racist or neanderthal. Nice people, but dumb as rocks.
29 weeks ago
29 weeks ago Link To Comment
Yep. The majority of Democrat voters are well-meaning people who are very badly mal-educated, and don't know it.

They also tend to be very poor at long range thinking, critical thinking, and logic. Basically, they run on emotion. This makes them easy to manipulate.

29 weeks ago
29 weeks ago Link To Comment
I am sure that Nancy Pelosi agrees with Margaret Sanger. After all, eugenics was "settled science" for many years, and everyone knows that we cannot question science. I wonder what Mrs. Pelosi thinks about phrenology...
29 weeks ago
29 weeks ago Link To Comment
Nancy obviously thinks there was also a good Margaret Sanger. Like Robert Byrd and Ted Kennedy.
29 weeks ago
29 weeks ago Link To Comment
To say Sanger was a racist is to be kind.

I prefer to formally call her a mass murdering psychotically deranged lunatic.

Which is right up the dim witted pelosi's alley.


29 weeks ago
29 weeks ago Link To Comment
"[We should] apply a stern and rigid policy of sterilization and segregation to that grade of population whose progeny is tainted, or whose inheritance is such that objectionable traits may be transmitted to offspring."

Applying Sanger's standards, Pelosi herself wouldn't have been born.

Applying Barack's standards (wouldn't want his daughters "punished with a baby"), Obama himself wouldn't have been born.

(sarcasm alert)
29 weeks ago
29 weeks ago Link To Comment
there is a happy thought!
29 weeks ago
29 weeks ago Link To Comment
Nasty Nancy did and does advocate something called health care legislation. That "something", passed in the wee hours after months of wrangling and nefarious dealing, has nothing to do with the advertised objectives but has everything to do with what Margaret Sanger envisioned.
29 weeks ago
29 weeks ago Link To Comment
Leftists are into eugenics, historically (e.g. people like Sanger and playwright George Bernard Shaw) and in real time. As the self-designated "elite", they gauge themselves so frickin' superior to run of the mill humans, that, from their perspective, determining who "gets" to live is a natural extension of their wonderfulness.

The chief Obamacare architect, Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel, is author of the Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALY) concept, where government bureaucrats determine the level and kind of medical care you're entitled to as a function of your "value" to society.

Around age 40 is good to go. After that, it's a downhill slide.
29 weeks ago
29 weeks ago Link To Comment
Pelosi celebrates Sanger because what she lacks in amorality she more than makes up for in stupidity.
29 weeks ago
29 weeks ago Link To Comment
Because Pelosi agrees with her. Colored folks are there to entrench Pelosi in power, and nothing else. If they were smart, they would have caught on. But they stay in Grandma Nan's plantation doing her biddings. Granma Nan despises them.
29 weeks ago
29 weeks ago Link To Comment
Pelosi feels justified thinking non-whites are mentally inferior because she finds it so easy to trick them with a few trinkets and lies into voting for her and her kind.

/facetiousness
29 weeks ago
29 weeks ago Link To Comment
Does anyone else notice that the White house is surrounded by mostly black neighborhoods with failing schools? That's Progressivism for you.
29 weeks ago
29 weeks ago Link To Comment
1 2 Next View All