Get PJ Media on your Apple

The PJ Tatler

by
Raymond Ibrahim

Bio

September 6, 2013 - 7:10 pm

Did the Syrian government, or did it not, use chemical weapons — that is the question that will apparently decide whether the U.S. will enter another messy war, one that may have many long-term consequences.

That is the question the media and its talking heads are abuzz with.

So concerned about “human rights” of Syrians?

And yet, that is also the question that — to any objective, independent thinker — is wholly irrelevant.

Why?  Because the fact is, from one end of the world to the other, outrageous human rights abuses — many much worse than the use of chemical weapons — are going on.

As Bruce Thornton recently put it in a FrontPage Magazine article:

[A]ll this rhetoric about “crimes against humanity” and the “responsibility to protect” reeks of hypocrisy and moral preening. The President said, “We cannot accept a world where women and children and innocent civilians are gassed on a terrible scale.” Who’s he kidding? We already have, in Hussein’s Iraq. Change “gassed” to “bombed,” “fire-bombed,” “hacked to death,” “machine-gunned,” and “starved” and you can cover the globe with the victims whose deaths on a “terrible scale” we have “accepted.” We have stood by and watched millions of women, children, and innocent civilians murdered in all sorts of ways equally as, or more gruesome and painful than, dying by poison gas.

In Rwanda anywhere from 500,000 to 1,000,000 men, women, and children were slaughtered in 1994, many by being hacked to death with machetes, not to mention the women raped, purposely infected with HIV, and sexually mutilated. We did nothing to stop the killing not because we militarily couldn’t, but because it was not in our national interests and security to do so. Hence we sent in a toothless U.N. to salve our consciences and deflect the charge of callous inactivity.

So all those calling for intervention in Syria or anywhere else to prevent “crimes against humanity” should be required to explain just how this unfortunately common slaughter is different from all those others we did not intervene to stop. The fact is, given that we cannot expend our citizens’ lives to protect all the millions of global victims of violence, we must make the decision based not on “international norms” but on the national interests and security of the United States, as these are determined by the citizens of the United States through their elected representatives. In the event, frequently pursuing those interests will end up punishing egregious violators like Saddam Hussein and the Taliban. But the definitive criterion must be how the action concretely protects our citizens and our interests.

Specifically answering that question––not appealing to delusional “international norms,” or assertions of deterring future malefactors on behalf of some imagined “global community”––should be the focus of the upcoming Congressional debate.

Concerning Syria, then, the real question is not whether Assad used chemical weapons or not, but rather why his doing so would warrant U.S. military intervention — when so many worse human rights abuses are happening all around the world, each one of which is as well-documented as the chemical accusation against Assad, which is still open to debate.

In short, if there is a legitimate case for invading Syria, U.S. leaders, beginning with Obama, need to start making it, and drop the hypocritical rhetoric about “human rights” concerns — which has become nothing short of insulting to one’s intelligence.

Raymond Ibrahim, a Middle East and Islam specialist, is author of Crucified Again: Exposing Islam’s New War on Christians (2013) and The Al Qaeda Reader (2007). His writings have appeared in a variety of media, including the Los Angeles Times, Washington Times, Jane’s Islamic Affairs Analyst, Middle East Quarterly, World Almanac of Islamism, and Chronicle of Higher Education; he has appeared on MSNBC, Fox News, C-SPAN, PBS, Reuters, Al-Jazeera, NPR, Blaze TV, and CBN. Ibrahim regularly speaks publicly, briefs governmental agencies, provides expert testimony for Islam-related lawsuits, and testifies before Congress. He is a Shillman Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center; Judith Friedman Rosen Writing Fellow, Middle East Forum; and a Media Fellow at the Hoover Institution, 2013. Ibrahim’s dual-background -- born and raised in the U.S. by Coptic Egyptian parents born and raised in the Middle East -- has provided him with unique advantages, from equal fluency in English and Arabic, to an equal understanding of the Western and Middle Eastern mindsets, positioning him to explain the latter to the former.

Comments are closed.

All Comments   (4)
All Comments   (4)
Sort: Newest Oldest Top Rated
I wish we could say that "action" photo was of Obama confronting Putin or Assad...but alas, it's more likely him lecturing Pennsylvania voters to stop clinging to their guns and their religion.
46 weeks ago
46 weeks ago Link To Comment
Let's take it a step further, shall we? The USA provided Hussein's Iraq intelligence and funding during the Iran-Iraq war. Hussein used chemical weapons extensively against the Iranians and the Kurds.

But now that someone in Syria has used sarin (probably), we gotta send in the Mariines?

"The demagogue is one who preaches doctrines he knows to be untrue to men he knows to be idiots." -- H. L. Mencken
46 weeks ago
46 weeks ago Link To Comment
If you go by motive, the "rebels" are the ones who had it, not Assad. If the "rebels" win, well there are around two million Christians in Syria and the blood thirsty "rebels" will figure "It's a start". If they take power the "rebels" will kill all of these two million Christians who are not able to flee Syria. This is apparently what Obama and McCain and those who support the "rebels" want.

BEIRUT September 6, 2013 (AP): "Syria Sends Reinforcements to Christian Village. The Syrian government sent reinforcements, including tanks and armored personnel carriers, to a predominantly Christian village north of Damascus where rebels have battled regime troops this week, a monitoring group said Friday.

Opposition fighters led by an al-Qaida-linked rebel faction attacked the ancient mountainside sanctuary of Maaloula on Wednesday, and briefly entered the village a day later before pulling out in the evening. The assault has spotlighted fears among Syria's religious minorities about the prominent role of Islamic extremists in the rebel ranks fighting to overthrow President Bashar Assad's regime.

The assault is being spearheaded by Jabhat al-Nusra, one of the most effective rebel factions and a group the U.S. has deemed a terrorist organization. The group includes Syrians as well as foreign fighters from across the Muslim world."
46 weeks ago
46 weeks ago Link To Comment
Rwanda shouldn't be different, but it is. I was horrified by the ability of France (Obama's new best friend, as it happens) to strike moral poses, while actually supporting the genocide in Rwanda. The French probably think they are terribly clever, to pull off a stunt like that.

In reality, the Frogs are very cynical, but pretty stupid.
46 weeks ago
46 weeks ago Link To Comment
View All