Get PJ Media on your Apple

The PJ Tatler

by
Stephen DeMaura

Bio

March 26, 2013 - 9:11 am
Recent polls suggest that Americans distrust the federal government and officials in Washington, D.C. The numbers aren’t particularly surprising: given the rampant waste, fraud and inefficiencies in the national bureaucracy, it’s no wonder this is the case.
Politicians and pundits alike agree that the federal government spends far too much, making promises it can’t fulfill and writing checks it simply can’t cash. It’s squarely in this dilemma that the Export-Import Bank finds itself.
The taxpayer-backed bank is a particularly egregious example of the federal government’s tendency toward wasteful overspending and unnecessary risk-taking. It’s an institution that damages our own economy by directing billions of taxpayer-backed dollars to the pockets of politically favored actors, costing us jobs.
Each year the Ex-Im Bank puts billions of government dollars into a wide array of investments. Some marginally succeed while others fall devastatingly short, like green energy boondoggles Solyndra and Abound Solar, both of which went bankrupt after receiving millions in funding from the Ex-Im Bank.
SolarWorld, another green energy firm on which various aspects of the federal government has shown great favor, offers a similar story: after receiving a loan guarantee of $61 million from the Ex-Im Bank in 2009, the company closed its U.S. manufacturing base and laid off 186 American employees.
These are just a few results achieved by your Ex-Im Bank. These green energy are particularly distressing, but the Bank’s greatest failings are central to the airline industry.
Ex-Im invests the vast majority of its annual budget in one company—Boeing–to facilitate the purchase of American-made aircrafts across the globe.  While a seemingly noble concept, these loans and guarantees directly benefit foreign competitors, necessarily penalizing American firms that cannot afford to compete with the generous terms offered by our own taxpayer-funded bank.
The Ex-Im Bank’s FY2012 budget is a perfect example of this backward policy. Of the $14.7 billion the bank spent, a staggering 84 percent was earmarked for Boeing.
Foreign airlines, benefitting from this access to U.S. funds, bought as many planes as they could to expand their routes to and from the United States, while increasing their profit margins.  As a result of the Ex-Im’s Bank’s manipulation of the international market, fair-playing domestic airlines lost passengers to their well-subsidized foreign rivals.
It is conservatively estimated that Ex-Im costs the U.S. airline industry up to 7,500 jobs and over $680 million per year.
In response to these statistics, Congress finally acted last summer to prevent the Ex-Im Bank from damaging American companies further. Congressional leaders later attempted to instill greater transparency and accountability into the organization, compelling it to consider the effect of its policies on the greater U.S. economy.
Specifically, the new laws called for the Ex-Im Bank to implement “economic impact procedures,” a practice that would require the bank to be open about its loan application and loan granting process. Congress also required Ex-Im to declare whether its financing of foreign airlines would go toward entities that compete with U.S. companies.
While these reforms were in no way onerous, the Ex-Im Bank has yet to abide by any of them.
Where the bank was supposed to limit financing to foreign-based competitors, it has continued to loan and guarantee billions.  Where it was supposed to be transparent in its application and awarding process, it has remained silent.
The waste and overspending practiced by the Ex-Im Bank has continued unabated.
Now, a new effort—led by Delta Airlines, Hawaiian Airlines and the Air Line Pilots Association International—is underway to reform Ex-Im more structurally. These organizations have filed a lawsuit against the Export-Import Bank for its role in damaging the U.S. economy. The suit alleges that the Ex-Im Bank is not adhering to the transparency procedures written into law when conducting economic analysis, and therefore acting illegally.
This lawsuit is the logical outcome of a scenario in which a government agency acts above the law in pursuit of an agenda that rewards well-connected businesses and lobbyists at the expense of other employers.
The Ex-Im Bank must be held accountable to the law and its shareholders—you, the taxpayer–and required to operate consistent with the law; otherwise, they will continue to threaten more American companies working to create jobs and compete in the marketplace.

Stephen DeMaura is the president of Americans for Job Security.

Comments are closed.

All Comments   (1)
All Comments   (1)
Sort: Newest Oldest Top Rated
SolarWorld did not receive financing from Ex-Im bank. We have understood that backers of at least one project for which we acted as a supplier may have applied for Ex-Im financing on the basis of using a U.S. supplier. As a supplier, however, we would not have required or received financing, and we would not know whether financing ultimately was provided to anyone involved in that project. In fact, we received no federal subsidy to offset the more than $600 million that we invested in purchasing, retooling and expanding our manufacturing operations in Hillsboro, Ore. It is unfortunate that this commentary has invoked factual misrepresentations to serve its logic.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
View All